Source talk:NetHack 1.4f/mon.c
Revision as of 01:13, 4 March 2008 by Kernigh bot (talk | contribs) (Talk:NetHack 1.4f/mon.c moved to Source talk:NetHack 1.4f/mon.c: Robot: moved page)
Why not just fix obvious corruptions, such as the one on line 264, rather than comment them? --ZeroOne 11:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well, OK...though this and the non-patching of invent.c seem to be the only ones. I otherwise get the same results when using the UUNet distribution. -- Ray Chason 16:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)