Forum:VR Interface - Revision history

Wikid: Turn-based life can still be internally consistent

2016-02-22T05:27:24Z

Turn-based life can still be internally consistent

Elronnd at 04:17, 22 February 2016

2016-02-22T04:17:12Z

Elronnd at 04:01, 22 February 2016

2016-02-22T04:01:51Z

70.193.108.252 at 02:17, 22 February 2016

2016-02-22T02:17:45Z

70.193.108.252 at 02:12, 22 February 2016

2016-02-22T02:12:36Z

Catullus at 02:04, 22 February 2016

2016-02-22T02:04:43Z

70.193.108.252: VR Interface

2016-02-22T01:18:42Z

VR Interface

New page

{{Forumheader|Watercooler}}


I use Vulture-Nethack and love it. With VR most likely picking up soon, how cool would a VR port be? I'm referring to lower dungeon levels as I am not good at this game.

John[[Special:Contributions/70.193.108.252|70.193.108.252]] 01:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:27, 22 February 2016
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:Just my two cents, but I'm not sure that VR is where NetHack is supposed to go. I mean, I'm biased because I use ASCII, but I've always felt like VR was supposed to be as lifelike as possible, and a turn-based game doesn't seem like it would make sense in such a context. <span style="background:green;border-radius:15px 0 0 8px">[[user:Elronnd\|Elronnd]]</span><span style="background: orange;border-radius:0 8px 15px 0">[[user_talk:Elronnd\|(talk)]]</span> 04:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)		:Just my two cents, but I'm not sure that VR is where NetHack is supposed to go. I mean, I'm biased because I use ASCII, but I've always felt like VR was supposed to be as lifelike as possible, and a turn-based game doesn't seem like it would make sense in such a context. <span style="background:green;border-radius:15px 0 0 8px">[[user:Elronnd\|Elronnd]]</span><span style="background: orange;border-radius:0 8px 15px 0">[[user_talk:Elronnd\|(talk)]]</span> 04:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	[http://www.erfworld.com/erf_stream/view Erfworld] is an example of a person being transported to a turn-based world. Admittedly the turns there are longer than a Nethack turn. But it shows that all the things that people do (converse, plan, hope), with the exception of certain key moves, can be constrained within a turn-based system. There are certain moves you just wouldn't be able to make until your opponent had their turn. [[User:Wikid\|Wikid]] ([[User talk:Wikid\|talk]]) 05:27, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:17, 22 February 2016
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Pretty cool that a 30 yr old ascii based game will live to see VR.		Pretty cool that a 30 yr old ascii based game will live to see VR.

−	:Just my two cents, but I'm not sure that VR is where NetHack is supposed to go. I mean, I'm biased because I'm ASCII, but I've always felt like VR was supposed to be as lifelike as possible, and a turn-based game doesn't seem like it would make sense in such a context. <span style="background:green;border-radius:15px 0 0 8px">[[user:Elronnd\|Elronnd]]</span><span style="background: orange;border-radius:0 8px 15px 0">[[user_talk:Elronnd\|(talk)]]</span> 04:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)	+	:Just my two cents, but I'm not sure that VR is where NetHack is supposed to go. I mean, I'm biased because I use ASCII, but I've always felt like VR was supposed to be as lifelike as possible, and a turn-based game doesn't seem like it would make sense in such a context. <span style="background:green;border-radius:15px 0 0 8px">[[user:Elronnd\|Elronnd]]</span><span style="background: orange;border-radius:0 8px 15px 0">[[user_talk:Elronnd\|(talk)]]</span> 04:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:01, 22 February 2016
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Pretty cool that a 30 yr old ascii based game will live to see VR.		Pretty cool that a 30 yr old ascii based game will live to see VR.
		+
		+	:Just my two cents, but I'm not sure that VR is where NetHack is supposed to go. I mean, I'm biased because I'm ASCII, but I've always felt like VR was supposed to be as lifelike as possible, and a turn-based game doesn't seem like it would make sense in such a context. <span style="background:green;border-radius:15px 0 0 8px">[[user:Elronnd\|Elronnd]]</span><span style="background: orange;border-radius:0 8px 15px 0">[[user_talk:Elronnd\|(talk)]]</span> 04:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 22 February 2016
Line 9:		Line 9:

	No idea and I am a computer guy. I envision nethack as a first person, so you would be able to look around as if you were really there. I think it will happen eventually. Hopefully in my lifetime. Today, Zuckerberg said VR is potentially the best social media and for once I must agree with him.		No idea and I am a computer guy. I envision nethack as a first person, so you would be able to look around as if you were really there. I think it will happen eventually. Hopefully in my lifetime. Today, Zuckerberg said VR is potentially the best social media and for once I must agree with him.
		+
		+	Pretty cool that a 30 yr old ascii based game will live to see VR.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:12, 22 February 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::How does VR work for 3rd person games? [[User:Catullus\|Catullus]] ([[User talk:Catullus\|talk]]) 02:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)		::How does VR work for 3rd person games? [[User:Catullus\|Catullus]] ([[User talk:Catullus\|talk]]) 02:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	No idea and I am a computer guy. I envision nethack as a first person, so you would be able to look around as if you were really there. I think it will happen eventually. Hopefully in my lifetime. Today, Zuckerberg said VR is potentially the best social media and for once I must agree with him.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 22 February 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:

	John[[Special:Contributions/70.193.108.252\|70.193.108.252]] 01:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)		John[[Special:Contributions/70.193.108.252\|70.193.108.252]] 01:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	::How does VR work for 3rd person games? [[User:Catullus\|Catullus]] ([[User talk:Catullus\|talk]]) 02:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)