Talk:Aggravate monster - Revision history

Funcrunch: /* Monster spell now wakes up meditating monsters */ typo

2016-01-01T05:18:28Z

Monster spell now wakes up meditating monsters: typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:18, 1 January 2016
Line 15:		Line 15:
	== Monster spell now wakes up meditating monsters ==		== Monster spell now wakes up meditating monsters ==

	Per the version 3.6 change notes, "meditating monsters stop meditating when affected by something which wakes sleeping monsters." The practical upshot of this, as a [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rec.games.roguelike.nethack/oeM5jVA4AEM couple of us on RGRN have discovered], is that a random golden naga ~~casing~~ the "aggravate monster" spell might wake up the Wizard before you enter his tower. [[User:Funcrunch\|Funcrunch]] ([[User talk:Funcrunch\|talk]]) 05:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)		Per the version 3.6 change notes, "meditating monsters stop meditating when affected by something which wakes sleeping monsters." The practical upshot of this, as a [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rec.games.roguelike.nethack/oeM5jVA4AEM couple of us on RGRN have discovered], is that a random golden naga casting the "aggravate monster" spell might wake up the Wizard before you enter his tower. [[User:Funcrunch\|Funcrunch]] ([[User talk:Funcrunch\|talk]]) 05:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Funcrunch: /* Monster spell now wakes up meditating monsters */ new section

2016-01-01T05:17:56Z

Monster spell now wakes up meditating monsters: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:17, 1 January 2016
Line 12:		Line 12:
	If you've failed to read a spellbook, is the Aggravate monster permanent? {{unsigned\|DemonSlayerThe3rd}}		If you've failed to read a spellbook, is the Aggravate monster permanent? {{unsigned\|DemonSlayerThe3rd}}
	:No. That effect is equivalent to the monster spell (on the bottom of the article), it does not give you the intrinsic. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:03, September 7, 2010 (UTC)		:No. That effect is equivalent to the monster spell (on the bottom of the article), it does not give you the intrinsic. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:03, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

			== Monster spell now wakes up meditating monsters ==

			Per the version 3.6 change notes, "meditating monsters stop meditating when affected by something which wakes sleeping monsters." The practical upshot of this, as a [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rec.games.roguelike.nethack/oeM5jVA4AEM couple of us on RGRN have discovered], is that a random golden naga casing the "aggravate monster" spell might wake up the Wizard before you enter his tower. [[User:Funcrunch\|Funcrunch]] ([[User talk:Funcrunch\|talk]]) 05:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Qazmlpok at 16:03, 7 September 2010

2010-09-07T16:03:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:03, 7 September 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	== Permanent or not? ==		== Permanent or not? ==

	If you've failed to read a spellbook, is the Aggravate monster permanent?		If you've failed to read a spellbook, is the Aggravate monster permanent? {{unsigned\|DemonSlayerThe3rd}}
			:No. That effect is equivalent to the monster spell (on the bottom of the article), it does not give you the intrinsic. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:03, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

DemonSlayerThe3rd: /* Permanent or not? */ new section

2010-09-07T15:50:37Z

Permanent or not?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 7 September 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Will this wake up sleeping pets? Source quotes say yes, wizmode test say no.		Will this wake up sleeping pets? Source quotes say yes, wizmode test say no.
	[[http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.roguelike.nethack/browse_thread/thread/1e7bd38a2a7ffa89# related issue]]-[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 23:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)		[[http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.roguelike.nethack/browse_thread/thread/1e7bd38a2a7ffa89# related issue]]-[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 23:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

			== Permanent or not? ==

			If you've failed to read a spellbook, is the Aggravate monster permanent?

Tjr: /* positive effects */ new section

2009-05-26T23:17:31Z

positive effects: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:17, 26 May 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: Yes. "You feel less attractive." See {{sourcecode\|sit.c\|442}} [Answer provided by [[User:RJaguar3\|RJaguar3]]; copied here by me --[[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 21:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)]		: Yes. "You feel less attractive." See {{sourcecode\|sit.c\|442}} [Answer provided by [[User:RJaguar3\|RJaguar3]]; copied here by me --[[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 21:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)]

			== positive effects ==

			Will this wake up sleeping pets? Source quotes say yes, wizmode test say no.
			[[http://groups.google.com/group/rec.games.roguelike.nethack/browse_thread/thread/1e7bd38a2a7ffa89# related issue]]-[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 23:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Marcmagus at 21:07, 27 January 2009

2009-01-27T21:07:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 27 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is it really true a gremlin will steal aggravate monster? I thougth they would only remove a subset of intrinsics. [[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 16:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)		Is it really true a gremlin will steal aggravate monster? I thougth they would only remove a subset of intrinsics. [[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 16:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

			: Yes. "You feel less attractive." See {{sourcecode\|sit.c\|442}} [Answer provided by [[User:RJaguar3\|RJaguar3]]; copied here by me --[[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 21:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)]

Tjr: New page: Is it really true a gremlin will steal aggravate monster? I thougth they would only remove a subset of intrinsics. ~~~~

2009-01-16T16:05:02Z

New page: Is it really true a gremlin will steal aggravate monster? I thougth they would only remove a subset of intrinsics. ~~~~

New page

Is it really true a gremlin will steal aggravate monster? I thougth they would only remove a subset of intrinsics. [[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 16:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)