Talk:Bane - Revision history

Umbire the Phantom: /* Todo regarding buffs in variants */

2020-03-30T05:04:55Z

‎Todo regarding buffs in variants

2020-03-30T04:09:13Z

‎Todo regarding buffs in variants: new section

2020-03-15T03:59:51Z

‎I think most of the content here should be merged into the artifacts' respective pages

2020-03-13T23:41:33Z

‎I think most of the content here should be merged into the artifacts' respective pages: new section

2020-03-13T02:57:53Z

2010-11-11T18:42:33Z

Text replace - "Wikihack" to "NetHackWiki"

2010-01-09T13:31:42Z

2006-12-10T21:08:29Z

‎Does Cyclops count as a giant?: yes

2006-12-10T20:33:47Z

2006-12-10T20:33:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:04, 30 March 2020
Line 38:		Line 38:

	How much info would be too much? The reason most of that info was moved to individual weapon pages was to avoid the problems from the previous discussion. --[[User:Aximili\|Aximili]] ([[User talk:Aximili\|talk]]) 04:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)		How much info would be too much? The reason most of that info was moved to individual weapon pages was to avoid the problems from the previous discussion. --[[User:Aximili\|Aximili]] ([[User talk:Aximili\|talk]]) 04:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	Mostly just "general" info on the addition of new/replacement Banes or the alteration/removal of others - I feel like Giantkiller isn't the only bane-related change in SLASH'EM, say - but naturally keep more weapon-specific info to the appropriate article. We only have two variants so far and I feel like there's a lot more applicable variants to at least mention. --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 05:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:09, 30 March 2020
Line 34:		Line 34:

	:Seconded. --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 03:59, 15 March 2020 (UTC)		:Seconded. --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 03:59, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Todo regarding buffs in variants ==
		+
		+	How much info would be too much? The reason most of that info was moved to individual weapon pages was to avoid the problems from the previous discussion. --[[User:Aximili\|Aximili]] ([[User talk:Aximili\|talk]]) 04:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:59, 15 March 2020
Line 32:		Line 32:

	--[[User:Phol ende wodan\|Phol ende wodan]] ([[User talk:Phol ende wodan\|talk]]) 23:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)		--[[User:Phol ende wodan\|Phol ende wodan]] ([[User talk:Phol ende wodan\|talk]]) 23:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Seconded. --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 03:59, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 13 March 2020
Line 15:		Line 15:

	How to fix the Banes? Perhaps skewing generation towards the monster you can now kill more easily, and a small chance of risk-free non-exploding [[enchantment]] for each one killed.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 13:31, January 9, 2010 (UTC)		How to fix the Banes? Perhaps skewing generation towards the monster you can now kill more easily, and a small chance of risk-free non-exploding [[enchantment]] for each one killed.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 13:31, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== I think most of the content here should be merged into the artifacts' respective pages ==
		+
		+	Nine top-level sections, each of them only a few sentences long, does not make for a good-looking page. Additionally, it seems that most information here is redundant with the artifacts' main pages.
		+
		+	Seems like it would be a better idea to merge any non-redundant content (including variant content) into those main pages, and simply make this page read something like:
		+
		+	"The Banes are a group of [[artifact weapons]], etcetera etcetera...
		+
		+	* [[Demonbane]]
		+	* [[Dragonbane]]
		+	* [[Giantslayer]]
		+	* ... and so on.
		+
		+	Despite its name, [[Magicbane]] isn't usually considered a bane because it doesn't have a double damage bonus against a specific type of monster. The [[sprig of wolfsbane]] etcetera..."
		+
		+	--[[User:Phol ende wodan\|Phol ende wodan]] ([[User talk:Phol ende wodan\|talk]]) 23:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 [[User:65.102.195.60|65.102.195.60]] 04:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
-:This page should be split up and reduced to a disambiguation page. "The Banes" are linked solely by being called Foobane, and half the weapons listed here aren't even that! Also, welcome to Wikihack, 65'; could you please create an account? :-) --[[User:Jayt|Jayt]] 11:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
+:This page should be split up and reduced to a disambiguation page. "The Banes" are linked solely by being called Foobane, and half the weapons listed here aren't even that! Also, welcome to NetHackWiki, 65'; could you please create an account? :-) --[[User:Jayt|Jayt]] 11:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 == Does Cyclops count as a giant? ==

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:57, 13 March 2020
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:31, 9 January 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:Cyclops and Lord Surtur count as giants in this case. I've updated the article now. --[[User:ZeroOne\|ZeroOne]] 21:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)		:Cyclops and Lord Surtur count as giants in this case. I've updated the article now. --[[User:ZeroOne\|ZeroOne]] 21:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	How to fix the Banes? Perhaps skewing generation towards the monster you can now kill more easily, and a small chance of risk-free non-exploding [[enchantment]] for each one killed.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 13:31, January 9, 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 10 December 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:

	- Potman (Guest) 10 December 2006		- Potman (Guest) 10 December 2006
		+
		+	:Cyclops and Lord Surtur count as giants in this case. I've updated the article now. --[[User:ZeroOne\|ZeroOne]] 21:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 == Does Cyclops count as a giant? ==
 My healer gets Giantslayer pretty often, I mean, and it'd be nice to know whether it did double damage on his quest nemesis or not.
 - Potman (Guest) 10 December 2006

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 10 December 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:This page should be split up and reduced to a disambiguation page. "The Banes" are linked solely by being called Foobane, and half the weapons listed here aren't even that! Also, welcome to Wikihack, 65'; could you please create an account? :-) --[[User:Jayt\|Jayt]] 11:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)		:This page should be split up and reduced to a disambiguation page. "The Banes" are linked solely by being called Foobane, and half the weapons listed here aren't even that! Also, welcome to Wikihack, 65'; could you please create an account? :-) --[[User:Jayt\|Jayt]] 11:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Does Cyclops count as a giant? ==
		+	My healer gets Giantslayer pretty often, I mean, and it'd be nice to know whether it did double damage on his quest nemesis or not.
		+	- Potman (Guest) 10 December 2006