Talk:Black pudding - Revision history

Qazmlpok: /* NPOV */

2017-02-04T00:42:23Z

‎NPOV

Evilkolbot: /* NPOV */ deatch drops?

2017-02-03T12:56:59Z

‎NPOV: deatch drops?

Qazmlpok: /* Resistances conveyed */

2015-12-17T23:11:09Z

‎Resistances conveyed

Fyr at 22:02, 17 December 2015

2015-12-17T22:02:00Z

Qazmlpok: /* polymorph */

2015-12-15T16:31:43Z

‎polymorph

195.2.244.193: /* polymorph */

2015-12-15T13:45:29Z

‎polymorph

195.2.244.193: /* polymorph */ is awesome

2015-12-15T13:44:57Z

‎polymorph: is awesome

Tjr: pacifist pudding best practise

2013-02-07T19:24:47Z

pacifist pudding best practise

Bcode: /* Pets polymorphed as puddings */ Nice, thanks.

2013-02-06T22:25:14Z

‎Pets polymorphed as puddings: Nice, thanks.

Thehammer: /* Pets polymorphed as puddings */ new section

2013-02-06T21:13:01Z

‎Pets polymorphed as puddings: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:42, 4 February 2017
Line 53:		Line 53:
	ineffective and pointless		ineffective and pointless
	*setting aside the POV, would it not be worthwhile trying for deatch drops? even a little bit? --[[User:Evilkolbot\|Evilkolbot]] ([[User talk:Evilkolbot\|talk]]) 12:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)		*setting aside the POV, would it not be worthwhile trying for deatch drops? even a little bit? --[[User:Evilkolbot\|Evilkolbot]] ([[User talk:Evilkolbot\|talk]]) 12:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
		+	:No. It's almost completely pointless. You will never get a death drop from a black pudding. They do not drop corpses any more, preventing sacrifice farming or even obtaining intrinsics (intrinsics will be corrected in the next patch). Cloned monsters give significantly less exp. About the only thing they can be farmed for now is pets - make a bunch of black puddings, tame them, polymorph them into something useful. Or maybe used to fill the astral plane, but acid blobs are probably a better bet. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 00:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:56, 3 February 2017
Line 49:		Line 49:
	*am i missing something, or did [[spellbook of polymorph]] just become even more awesome? --[[Special:Contributions/195.2.244.193\|195.2.244.193]] 13:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)		*am i missing something, or did [[spellbook of polymorph]] just become even more awesome? --[[Special:Contributions/195.2.244.193\|195.2.244.193]] 13:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
	::Because of what, globs of black pudding? You could polymorph the corpses before, so globs really aren't any better for this. Probably worse, since you can't stack them. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 16:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)		::Because of what, globs of black pudding? You could polymorph the corpses before, so globs really aren't any better for this. Probably worse, since you can't stack them. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 16:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	==NPOV==
		+	ineffective and pointless
		+	*setting aside the POV, would it not be worthwhile trying for deatch drops? even a little bit? --[[User:Evilkolbot\|Evilkolbot]] ([[User talk:Evilkolbot\|talk]]) 12:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:11, 17 December 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The box says that eating the corpse conveys zero resistances, but I just ate one on NAO and felt full of hot air... [[User:Fyr\|Fyr]] ([[User talk:Fyr\|talk]]) 22:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)		The box says that eating the corpse conveys zero resistances, but I just ate one on NAO and felt full of hot air... [[User:Fyr\|Fyr]] ([[User talk:Fyr\|talk]]) 22:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	:Did you eat a '''corpse''' of a black pudding, or a '''glob'''? If the former, you're still playing 3.4.3. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 23:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

	Add something about the fact that people unskilled with daggers can cut the puddings and they will split in two at a chance of 1/5.		Add something about the fact that people unskilled with daggers can cut the puddings and they will split in two at a chance of 1/5.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 17 December 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Resistances conveyed ==
		+
		+	The box says that eating the corpse conveys zero resistances, but I just ate one on NAO and felt full of hot air... [[User:Fyr\|Fyr]] ([[User talk:Fyr\|talk]]) 22:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
	Add something about the fact that people unskilled with daggers can cut the puddings and they will split in two at a chance of 1/5.		Add something about the fact that people unskilled with daggers can cut the puddings and they will split in two at a chance of 1/5.
	Happened to me.--[[User:Vanzant Elbereth\|Vanzant Elbereth]] 00:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)		Happened to me.--[[User:Vanzant Elbereth\|Vanzant Elbereth]] 00:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:31, 15 December 2015
Line 43:		Line 43:
	==polymorph==		==polymorph==
	*am i missing something, or did [[spellbook of polymorph]] just become even more awesome? --[[Special:Contributions/195.2.244.193\|195.2.244.193]] 13:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)		*am i missing something, or did [[spellbook of polymorph]] just become even more awesome? --[[Special:Contributions/195.2.244.193\|195.2.244.193]] 13:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
		+	::Because of what, globs of black pudding? You could polymorph the corpses before, so globs really aren't any better for this. Probably worse, since you can't stack them. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 16:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:45, 15 December 2015
Line 42:		Line 42:

	==polymorph==		==polymorph==
−	*am i missing something, or did [[~~spell~~ of polymorph]] just become even more awesome? --[[Special:Contributions/195.2.244.193\|195.2.244.193]] 13:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)	+	*am i missing something, or did [[spellbook of polymorph]] just become even more awesome? --[[Special:Contributions/195.2.244.193\|195.2.244.193]] 13:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:44, 15 December 2015
Line 40:		Line 40:

	::: The old pudding (who stays put) will lose one tameness and gain one abuse. The new pudding (on an adjacent spot) will have tameness 5 and abuse zero. Pacifist best practise is that you divide your puddings at leisure and track their tameness and abuse in their names. Then polymorph the unabused ones into something carnivorous, feed them lots of meatballs to get to tameness 20, and then whistle the entire unabused herd onto the polytrap until you get something good. Deposit the good morphs on a different level and visit it every 74 turns (to keep tameness up) while you work the rest. Something good means a balrog, and possibly other red demons, titan, jabberwock, (master) mind flayer, purple worm, winged gargoyle. Don't bother with the other "recommended" types if you really depend on your pet for ascension. Those get added by players who nearly got mauled by a soldier ant and now think it can face the Riders (I may have exaggerated for effect). ---[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 19:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)		::: The old pudding (who stays put) will lose one tameness and gain one abuse. The new pudding (on an adjacent spot) will have tameness 5 and abuse zero. Pacifist best practise is that you divide your puddings at leisure and track their tameness and abuse in their names. Then polymorph the unabused ones into something carnivorous, feed them lots of meatballs to get to tameness 20, and then whistle the entire unabused herd onto the polytrap until you get something good. Deposit the good morphs on a different level and visit it every 74 turns (to keep tameness up) while you work the rest. Something good means a balrog, and possibly other red demons, titan, jabberwock, (master) mind flayer, purple worm, winged gargoyle. Don't bother with the other "recommended" types if you really depend on your pet for ascension. Those get added by players who nearly got mauled by a soldier ant and now think it can face the Riders (I may have exaggerated for effect). ---[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 19:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	==polymorph==
		+	*am i missing something, or did [[spell of polymorph]] just become even more awesome? --[[Special:Contributions/195.2.244.193\|195.2.244.193]] 13:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 7 February 2013
Line 38:		Line 38:
	:Thanks for your contribution! Just a note: it does not have to be a polymorphed pet, a pet that's naturally a pudding is fine too. Also, what you added implied that killing pets angers your god. That's wrong.		:Thanks for your contribution! Just a note: it does not have to be a polymorphed pet, a pet that's naturally a pudding is fine too. Also, what you added implied that killing pets angers your god. That's wrong.
	:I altered that a bit. —[[User:bcode\|bcode]] <sup>[[User talk:bcode\|talk]] \| [[Special:EmailUser/Bcode\|mail]]</sup> 22:25, 6 February 2013 (UTC)		:I altered that a bit. —[[User:bcode\|bcode]] <sup>[[User talk:bcode\|talk]] \| [[Special:EmailUser/Bcode\|mail]]</sup> 22:25, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	::: The old pudding (who stays put) will lose one tameness and gain one abuse. The new pudding (on an adjacent spot) will have tameness 5 and abuse zero. Pacifist best practise is that you divide your puddings at leisure and track their tameness and abuse in their names. Then polymorph the unabused ones into something carnivorous, feed them lots of meatballs to get to tameness 20, and then whistle the entire unabused herd onto the polytrap until you get something good. Deposit the good morphs on a different level and visit it every 74 turns (to keep tameness up) while you work the rest. Something good means a balrog, and possibly other red demons, titan, jabberwock, (master) mind flayer, purple worm, winged gargoyle. Don't bother with the other "recommended" types if you really depend on your pet for ascension. Those get added by players who nearly got mauled by a soldier ant and now think it can face the Riders (I may have exaggerated for effect). ---[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 19:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 6 February 2013
Line 35:		Line 35:

	--[[User:Thehammer\|Thehammer]] ([[User talk:Thehammer\|talk]]) 21:13, 6 February 2013 (UTC)		--[[User:Thehammer\|Thehammer]] ([[User talk:Thehammer\|talk]]) 21:13, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Thanks for your contribution! Just a note: it does not have to be a polymorphed pet, a pet that's naturally a pudding is fine too. Also, what you added implied that killing pets angers your god. That's wrong.
		+	:I altered that a bit. —[[User:bcode\|bcode]] <sup>[[User talk:bcode\|talk]] \| [[Special:EmailUser/Bcode\|mail]]</sup> 22:25, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:13, 6 February 2013
Line 21:		Line 21:

	It worked, thankyou bunches =]		It worked, thankyou bunches =]
		+
		+	== Pets polymorphed as puddings ==
		+
		+	I'm going to add in a section on each of the pudding pages, and check to see if this little gem exists on the polymorph trap page...
		+
		+	I just polytrapped my doggy into a pudding, and thought... what if.
		+
		+	So (being a brown pudding and not having a [[Puddingbane]] handy) I whacked my little buddy with my iron helm.
		+
		+	Lo and behold, I ended up with two tame (albeit probably less tame) brown puddings called Felix. It may be completely plausible to pudding farm pets for polytrapping!
		+
		+	All this because I've been here for 30 minutes because my invisible, artifact wielding pet titan (who WAS my doggy) ate a doppelganger and became a newt.
		+
		+	--[[User:Thehammer\|Thehammer]] ([[User talk:Thehammer\|talk]]) 21:13, 6 February 2013 (UTC)