Talk:Bugs in NetHack 4 - Revision history

Tjr: /* More info on some vanilla bugs */ c343-209

2013-04-18T19:06:09Z

More info on some vanilla bugs: c343-209

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:06, 18 April 2013
Line 36:		Line 36:
	The core spoiler bugs are missing from the list.		The core spoiler bugs are missing from the list.
	--[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 08:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)		--[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 08:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

			* C343-209: http://nethackwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Bugs_in_NetHack_3.4.3&diff=18933&oldid=18932 -- used to read "\|C343-209\|\|Open\|\|[[Engulfing\|Engulfed]] throwing loses weapons from the final turn."
			--[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 19:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Tjr: More info on some bugs

2013-03-27T08:56:59Z

More info on some bugs

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:56, 27 March 2013
Line 26:		Line 26:

	[[Special:Contributions/95.149.229.205\|95.149.229.205]] 15:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/95.149.229.205\|95.149.229.205]] 15:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

			==More info on some vanilla bugs==
			* C343-154: IMHO the bug refers to the fact you can create fireproof candles by erodeproofing a wielded pick-axe, then polymorphing it. IIRC you can't wish for fireproof candles directly, and it doesn't make sense for a working candle to be fireproof.
			* C343-206: quoting [[Blindness#Object_appearances]]: "The special attacks of the Tsurugi of Muramasa and Vorpal Blade always tell you the artifacts's appearance.[22][23][24][25] The gift you would receive on crowning as neutral or chaotic are made "seen" if you are already holding it."
			* C343-214: poke vlad with magicbane until he's confused and wounded. Assume he's created with a scroll of teleportation. He will read it, and levelport to any random level in the Dungeons of Doom, Gehennom abvoe his tower, and his tower.
			* C343-229: A similar effect applies to monsters getting dressed, while wearing a cursed cloak / body armor.
			* C343-242: Priests will pick a random spot next to their altar, and try to go there whithout stepping into your line of attack. Game-play observation implies this "without" part also blocks them from stepping onto a (bones file) grave.
			* C343-246: [[wresting]]
			The core spoiler bugs are missing from the list.
			--[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 08:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

95.149.229.205: /* Admin-only CSS change requested */ formatting

2012-05-29T15:52:13Z

Admin-only CSS change requested: formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:52, 29 May 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	.foo th, .foo td { vertical-align: top }		.foo th, .foo td { vertical-align: top }

	It would also be nice if the ~~''Description''~~ column wasn't so cramped in favour of the ~~''Additional~~ notes'' column, although that sounds harder to fix. Personally, I would put the additional notes in the ~~''Description''~~ column, like so:		It would also be nice if the description column wasn't so cramped in favour of the additional notes column, although that sounds harder to fix. Personally, I would put the additional notes in the description column, like so:

	:Wielded silver arrows don't cause silver damage on some silver-haters.		<blockquote>
	:		<p>Wielded silver arrows don't cause silver damage on some silver-haters.</p>
	:'''Additional notes:''' Fixed by Alex Smith.		<p>'''Additional notes:''' Fixed by Alex Smith.</p>
			</blockquote>

	[[Special:Contributions/95.149.229.205\|95.149.229.205]] 15:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/95.149.229.205\|95.149.229.205]] 15:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

95.149.229.205: /* Admin-only CSS change requested */ new section

2012-05-29T15:50:52Z

Admin-only CSS change requested: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 29 May 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	::WP has http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Anchor --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 13:29, 22 May 2012 (UTC)		::WP has http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Anchor --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 13:29, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
	::I've created {{tl\|aa}} --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 14:12, 22 May 2012 (UTC)		::I've created {{tl\|aa}} --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 14:12, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

			== Admin-only CSS change requested ==

			Right now, the anchors to individual bugs aren't that useful, as they usually link midway through the description of the bug, due to the text that is anchored being vertically aligned to the middle. I suggest adding a class to the CSS in [[MediaWiki:Common.css]] that top-aligns all the <code><th></code>s and <code><td></code>s inside that table:

			.foo th, .foo td { vertical-align: top }

			It would also be nice if the ''Description'' column wasn't so cramped in favour of the ''Additional notes'' column, although that sounds harder to fix. Personally, I would put the additional notes in the ''Description'' column, like so:

			:Wielded silver arrows don't cause silver damage on some silver-haters.
			:
			:'''Additional notes:''' Fixed by Alex Smith.

			[[Special:Contributions/95.149.229.205\|95.149.229.205]] 15:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Paxed: /* link anchors */

2012-05-22T14:12:36Z

link anchors

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 22 May 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:Yes; if you replace <code>C343-21</code> with <code><nowiki><span id="C343-21">C343-21</span></nowiki></code> (and so on for each bug), then you'll be able to use such a link. I would suggest creating a [[Template:C]] to abstract this, so that you can just write <code><nowiki>{{C\|343-21}}</nowiki></code> instead. [[Special:Contributions/95.149.230.215\|95.149.230.215]] 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)		:Yes; if you replace <code>C343-21</code> with <code><nowiki><span id="C343-21">C343-21</span></nowiki></code> (and so on for each bug), then you'll be able to use such a link. I would suggest creating a [[Template:C]] to abstract this, so that you can just write <code><nowiki>{{C\|343-21}}</nowiki></code> instead. [[Special:Contributions/95.149.230.215\|95.149.230.215]] 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
	::WP has http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Anchor --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 13:29, 22 May 2012 (UTC)		::WP has http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Anchor --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 13:29, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
			::I've created {{tl\|aa}} --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 14:12, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Paxed: /* link anchors */

2012-05-22T13:29:37Z

link anchors

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 22 May 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Is there a way to make link anchors? I'd like to do (for example) this: <nowiki>[[Bugs_in_NetHack_4#C343-21\|Leashes can "teleport" pets through doors]]</nowiki>. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 21:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)		Is there a way to make link anchors? I'd like to do (for example) this: <nowiki>[[Bugs_in_NetHack_4#C343-21\|Leashes can "teleport" pets through doors]]</nowiki>. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 21:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
	:Yes; if you replace <code>C343-21</code> with <code><nowiki><span id="C343-21">C343-21</span></nowiki></code> (and so on for each bug), then you'll be able to use such a link. I would suggest creating a [[Template:C]] to abstract this, so that you can just write <code><nowiki>{{C\|343-21}}</nowiki></code> instead. [[Special:Contributions/95.149.230.215\|95.149.230.215]] 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)		:Yes; if you replace <code>C343-21</code> with <code><nowiki><span id="C343-21">C343-21</span></nowiki></code> (and so on for each bug), then you'll be able to use such a link. I would suggest creating a [[Template:C]] to abstract this, so that you can just write <code><nowiki>{{C\|343-21}}</nowiki></code> instead. [[Special:Contributions/95.149.230.215\|95.149.230.215]] 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
			::WP has http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Anchor --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 13:29, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

95.149.230.215: /* link anchors */ correct HTML

2012-05-22T13:23:12Z

link anchors: correct HTML

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 22 May 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Is there a way to make link anchors? I'd like to do (for example) this: <nowiki>[[Bugs_in_NetHack_4#C343-21\|Leashes can "teleport" pets through doors]]</nowiki>. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 21:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)		Is there a way to make link anchors? I'd like to do (for example) this: <nowiki>[[Bugs_in_NetHack_4#C343-21\|Leashes can "teleport" pets through doors]]</nowiki>. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 21:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
	:Yes; if you replace <code>C343-21</code> with <code><nowiki><span ~~name~~="C343-21">C343-21</span></nowiki></code> (and so on for each bug), then you'll be able to use such a link. I would suggest creating a [[Template:C]] to abstract this, so that you can just write <code><nowiki>{{C\|343-21}}</nowiki></code> instead. [[Special:Contributions/95.149.230.215\|95.149.230.215]] 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)		:Yes; if you replace <code>C343-21</code> with <code><nowiki><span id="C343-21">C343-21</span></nowiki></code> (and so on for each bug), then you'll be able to use such a link. I would suggest creating a [[Template:C]] to abstract this, so that you can just write <code><nowiki>{{C\|343-21}}</nowiki></code> instead. [[Special:Contributions/95.149.230.215\|95.149.230.215]] 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

95.149.230.215: /* link anchors */ yes, it's possible

2012-05-22T10:51:16Z

link anchors: yes, it's possible

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:51, 22 May 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Is there a way to make link anchors? I'd like to do (for example) this: <nowiki>[[Bugs_in_NetHack_4#C343-21\|Leashes can "teleport" pets through doors]]</nowiki>. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 21:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)		Is there a way to make link anchors? I'd like to do (for example) this: <nowiki>[[Bugs_in_NetHack_4#C343-21\|Leashes can "teleport" pets through doors]]</nowiki>. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 21:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
			:Yes; if you replace <code>C343-21</code> with <code><nowiki><span name="C343-21">C343-21</span></nowiki></code> (and so on for each bug), then you'll be able to use such a link. I would suggest creating a [[Template:C]] to abstract this, so that you can just write <code><nowiki>{{C\|343-21}}</nowiki></code> instead. [[Special:Contributions/95.149.230.215\|95.149.230.215]] 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Tjr: /* link anchors */ new section

2012-05-09T21:40:18Z

link anchors: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:40, 9 May 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	C343-48: Killing your pet ... This might refer to the fact you won't break pacifist conduct if you branchport into an already-full level - pets and followers simply dissappear. The [[pacifist]] page has a few more "safe" ways to kill things. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)		C343-48: Killing your pet ... This might refer to the fact you won't break pacifist conduct if you branchport into an already-full level - pets and followers simply dissappear. The [[pacifist]] page has a few more "safe" ways to kill things. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

			== link anchors ==

			Is there a way to make link anchors? I'd like to do (for example) this: <nowiki>[[Bugs_in_NetHack_4#C343-21\|Leashes can "teleport" pets through doors]]</nowiki>. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 21:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Bcode: worm teeth don't actually stack

2012-05-01T21:00:58Z

worm teeth don't actually stack

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 1 May 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Regarding bug C341-10, I believe worm teeth and crysknives don't stack because vanilla can't pluralize tooth correctly. That pretty much goes against the spirit of the projectile bonus you get for those items. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC)		Regarding bug C341-10, I believe worm teeth and crysknives don't stack because vanilla can't pluralize tooth correctly. That pretty much goes against the spirit of the projectile bonus you get for those items. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
	:Nope, they do stack. Credits to Bcode. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)		:Nope, they do stack. Credits to Bcode. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
			::Actually, they (normally) don't stack, but if they could, the "tooth" would be pluralized correctly to "teeth"; I used gdb to modify the object quantity and create a stack of them. --[[User:Bcode\|Bcode]] 21:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

	C343-48: Killing your pet ... This might refer to the fact you won't break pacifist conduct if you branchport into an already-full level - pets and followers simply dissappear. The [[pacifist]] page has a few more "safe" ways to kill things. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)		C343-48: Killing your pet ... This might refer to the fact you won't break pacifist conduct if you branchport into an already-full level - pets and followers simply dissappear. The [[pacifist]] page has a few more "safe" ways to kill things. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 22 May 2012
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:Yes; if you replace <code>C343-21</code> with <code><nowiki><span id="C343-21">C343-21</span></nowiki></code> (and so on for each bug), then you'll be able to use such a link. I would suggest creating a [[Template:C]] to abstract this, so that you can just write <code><nowiki>{{C\|343-21}}</nowiki></code> instead. [[Special:Contributions/95.149.230.215\|95.149.230.215]] 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)		:Yes; if you replace <code>C343-21</code> with <code><nowiki><span id="C343-21">C343-21</span></nowiki></code> (and so on for each bug), then you'll be able to use such a link. I would suggest creating a [[Template:C]] to abstract this, so that you can just write <code><nowiki>{{C\|343-21}}</nowiki></code> instead. [[Special:Contributions/95.149.230.215\|95.149.230.215]] 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
	::WP has http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Anchor --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 13:29, 22 May 2012 (UTC)		::WP has http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Anchor --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 13:29, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
			::I've created {{tl\|aa}} --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 14:12, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 22 May 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Is there a way to make link anchors? I'd like to do (for example) this: <nowiki>[[Bugs_in_NetHack_4#C343-21\|Leashes can "teleport" pets through doors]]</nowiki>. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 21:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)		Is there a way to make link anchors? I'd like to do (for example) this: <nowiki>[[Bugs_in_NetHack_4#C343-21\|Leashes can "teleport" pets through doors]]</nowiki>. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 21:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
	:Yes; if you replace <code>C343-21</code> with <code><nowiki><span id="C343-21">C343-21</span></nowiki></code> (and so on for each bug), then you'll be able to use such a link. I would suggest creating a [[Template:C]] to abstract this, so that you can just write <code><nowiki>{{C\|343-21}}</nowiki></code> instead. [[Special:Contributions/95.149.230.215\|95.149.230.215]] 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)		:Yes; if you replace <code>C343-21</code> with <code><nowiki><span id="C343-21">C343-21</span></nowiki></code> (and so on for each bug), then you'll be able to use such a link. I would suggest creating a [[Template:C]] to abstract this, so that you can just write <code><nowiki>{{C\|343-21}}</nowiki></code> instead. [[Special:Contributions/95.149.230.215\|95.149.230.215]] 10:51, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
			::WP has http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Anchor --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 13:29, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 1 May 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Regarding bug C341-10, I believe worm teeth and crysknives don't stack because vanilla can't pluralize tooth correctly. That pretty much goes against the spirit of the projectile bonus you get for those items. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC)		Regarding bug C341-10, I believe worm teeth and crysknives don't stack because vanilla can't pluralize tooth correctly. That pretty much goes against the spirit of the projectile bonus you get for those items. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
	:Nope, they do stack. Credits to Bcode. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)		:Nope, they do stack. Credits to Bcode. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
			::Actually, they (normally) don't stack, but if they could, the "tooth" would be pluralized correctly to "teeth"; I used gdb to modify the object quantity and create a stack of them. --[[User:Bcode\|Bcode]] 21:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

	C343-48: Killing your pet ... This might refer to the fact you won't break pacifist conduct if you branchport into an already-full level - pets and followers simply dissappear. The [[pacifist]] page has a few more "safe" ways to kill things. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)		C343-48: Killing your pet ... This might refer to the fact you won't break pacifist conduct if you branchport into an already-full level - pets and followers simply dissappear. The [[pacifist]] page has a few more "safe" ways to kill things. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:47, 1 May 2012 (UTC)