Talk:Cancellation - Revision history

Tjr: /* Canceling Shapeshifters */

2013-03-24T12:27:44Z

Canceling Shapeshifters

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:27, 24 March 2013
Line 25:		Line 25:
	What happens if you cancel a shapeshifter ? Does it work at all ? For example a tame chamälen what is currently a dragon ? Does it return into chamäleon form or does it stay in its dragon form ? --[[Special:Contributions/79.210.73.53\|79.210.73.53]] 22:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)		What happens if you cancel a shapeshifter ? Does it work at all ? For example a tame chamälen what is currently a dragon ? Does it return into chamäleon form or does it stay in its dragon form ? --[[Special:Contributions/79.210.73.53\|79.210.73.53]] 22:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

	: Nothing happens if I read the code correctly. Weremonsters rehumanize and clay golems get killed, but no other monsters are affected. {{sourcecode\|zap.c\|2266}} --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 12:26, 24 March 2013 (UTC)		: Nothing happens if I read the code correctly. Weremonsters rehumanize and clay golems get killed, but no other monsters are affected. Of course, the monster gets the "cancelled" attribute, which nullifies most special attacks. {{sourcecode\|zap.c\|2266}} --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 12:26, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Tjr: pet shapeshifters should not unpoly

2013-03-24T12:26:26Z

pet shapeshifters should not unpoly

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:26, 24 March 2013
Line 24:		Line 24:

	What happens if you cancel a shapeshifter ? Does it work at all ? For example a tame chamälen what is currently a dragon ? Does it return into chamäleon form or does it stay in its dragon form ? --[[Special:Contributions/79.210.73.53\|79.210.73.53]] 22:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)		What happens if you cancel a shapeshifter ? Does it work at all ? For example a tame chamälen what is currently a dragon ? Does it return into chamäleon form or does it stay in its dragon form ? --[[Special:Contributions/79.210.73.53\|79.210.73.53]] 22:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

			: Nothing happens if I read the code correctly. Weremonsters rehumanize and clay golems get killed, but no other monsters are affected. {{sourcecode\|zap.c\|2266}} --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 12:26, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

79.210.73.53: /* Canceling Shapeshifters */ new section

2013-03-23T22:41:12Z

Canceling Shapeshifters: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:41, 23 March 2013
Line 20:		Line 20:

	: Actually, it's a separate code path that never checks for magic resistance, see [[Source:Ref/zapyourself]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 18:17, 12 August 2011 (UTC)		: Actually, it's a separate code path that never checks for magic resistance, see [[Source:Ref/zapyourself]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 18:17, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

			== Canceling Shapeshifters ==

			What happens if you cancel a shapeshifter ? Does it work at all ? For example a tame chamälen what is currently a dragon ? Does it return into chamäleon form or does it stay in its dragon form ? --[[Special:Contributions/79.210.73.53\|79.210.73.53]] 22:41, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Tjr: separate code path

2011-08-12T18:17:51Z

separate code path

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 12 August 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Article says that if you zap yourself, it bypasses the MR protection. Tried this in SLASH'EM 0.0.7E7F3, and it is not the case. i.e. You (and your inventory) are still protected by the MR. Does the MR-bypass only apply to self-zapping in Vanilla? --[[User:AileTheAlien\|AileTheAlien]] 16:47, 12 August 2011 (UTC)		Article says that if you zap yourself, it bypasses the MR protection. Tried this in SLASH'EM 0.0.7E7F3, and it is not the case. i.e. You (and your inventory) are still protected by the MR. Does the MR-bypass only apply to self-zapping in Vanilla? --[[User:AileTheAlien\|AileTheAlien]] 16:47, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

			: Actually, it's a separate code path that never checks for magic resistance, see [[Source:Ref/zapyourself]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 18:17, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

AileTheAlien: /* Self-Cancellation */ new section

2011-08-12T16:47:43Z

Self-Cancellation: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:47, 12 August 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:

	While it doesn't matter for cancellation, I feel priest and shopkeeper exceptions should be documented somewhere on the wiki. In fact, the only monsters where cancellation really does matter cannot be uncancelled: foocubi. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 10:30, 21 June 2011 (UTC)		While it doesn't matter for cancellation, I feel priest and shopkeeper exceptions should be documented somewhere on the wiki. In fact, the only monsters where cancellation really does matter cannot be uncancelled: foocubi. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 10:30, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

			== Self-Cancellation ==

			Article says that if you zap yourself, it bypasses the MR protection. Tried this in SLASH'EM 0.0.7E7F3, and it is not the case. i.e. You (and your inventory) are still protected by the MR. Does the MR-bypass only apply to self-zapping in Vanilla? --[[User:AileTheAlien\|AileTheAlien]] 16:47, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Tjr: /* uncancelling */ new section

2011-06-21T10:30:45Z

uncancelling: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:30, 21 June 2011
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Can magic-resistant objects like grey dragon scale mail be canceled?[[User:Ih fek\|Ih fek]] 21:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)		Can magic-resistant objects like grey dragon scale mail be canceled?[[User:Ih fek\|Ih fek]] 21:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
	: Yes. In a similar vein, crystal plate mail will only shatter if you do not wear it. [[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 14:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC)		: Yes. In a similar vein, crystal plate mail will only shatter if you do not wear it. [[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 14:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

			== uncancelling ==

			While it doesn't matter for cancellation, I feel priest and shopkeeper exceptions should be documented somewhere on the wiki. In fact, the only monsters where cancellation really does matter cannot be uncancelled: foocubi. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 10:30, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Tjr: /* Canceling objects */

2009-04-30T14:12:13Z

Canceling objects

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 30 April 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Can magic-resistant objects like grey dragon scale mail be canceled?[[User:Ih fek\|Ih fek]] 21:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)		Can magic-resistant objects like grey dragon scale mail be canceled?[[User:Ih fek\|Ih fek]] 21:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
			: Yes. In a similar vein, crystal plate mail will only shatter if you do not wear it. [[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 14:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Ih fek: /* Canceling objects */ new section

2009-03-10T21:35:48Z

Canceling objects: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:35, 10 March 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:No, they spontaneously go poof.--[[User:Ray Chason\|Ray Chason]] 22:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)		:No, they spontaneously go poof.--[[User:Ray Chason\|Ray Chason]] 22:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
	::OK thanks. I knew they didn't last forever, but couldn't remember how it happened. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 23:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)		::OK thanks. I knew they didn't last forever, but couldn't remember how it happened. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 23:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

			== Canceling objects ==

			Can magic-resistant objects like grey dragon scale mail be canceled?[[User:Ih fek\|Ih fek]] 21:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Rogerb-on-NAO: Thanks

2008-05-22T23:34:28Z

Thanks

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:34, 22 May 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:No, they spontaneously go poof.--[[User:Ray Chason\|Ray Chason]] 22:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)		:No, they spontaneously go poof.--[[User:Ray Chason\|Ray Chason]] 22:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
			::OK thanks. I knew they didn't last forever, but couldn't remember how it happened. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 23:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Ray Chason: /* Can nurses also spontaneously cancel? */ No

2008-05-22T22:45:47Z

Can nurses also spontaneously cancel?: No

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 22 May 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	--[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 22:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)		--[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 22:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

			:No, they spontaneously go poof.--[[User:Ray Chason\|Ray Chason]] 22:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)