Talk:Comestible - Revision history

Furey: /* Dessert first */ Tinning zombies is fine. (Hey I edit articles from 2009, I can necro-post on talk pages too.)

2024-06-16T19:53:05Z

‎Dessert first: Tinning zombies is fine. (Hey I edit articles from 2009, I can necro-post on talk pages too.)

Umbire the Phantom: pothole

2023-10-30T16:00:24Z

pothole

Nethacker1: /* Optimal nutrition / weight */ clarified

2023-01-16T12:29:40Z

‎Optimal nutrition / weight: clarified

Nethacker1: /* Optimal nutrition / weight */ no contradiction

2023-01-16T12:28:06Z

‎Optimal nutrition / weight: no contradiction

Tonttu3: /* Optimal nutrition / weight */ new section

2023-01-16T09:31:08Z

‎Optimal nutrition / weight: new section

Hoanwan: /* Rotten Pear */ Fix formatting

2017-10-17T01:09:51Z

‎Rotten Pear: Fix formatting

Hoanwan: /* Rotten Pear */ Respond to question.

2017-10-17T01:09:07Z

‎Rotten Pear: Respond to question.

WarriorX90: /* Rotten Pear */

2017-10-16T12:57:28Z

‎Rotten Pear

WarriorX90: /* Rotten Pear */ new section

2017-10-16T12:57:08Z

‎Rotten Pear: new section

Qazmlpok: /* Rotten Food */

2010-08-14T16:43:47Z

‎Rotten Food

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 16 June 2024
Line 33:		Line 33:

	::: Only poison and acid is neutralized by tinning. Hallucination, stoning, sliming, and food poisoning (tinned a zombie?) are not. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 23:09, December 28, 2009 (UTC)		::: Only poison and acid is neutralized by tinning. Hallucination, stoning, sliming, and food poisoning (tinned a zombie?) are not. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 23:09, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::: Yup, I tin lots of giant zombies. No food poisoning yet. Food poisoning is neutralized by tinning. [[User:Furey\|Furey]] ([[User talk:Furey\|talk]]) 19:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

	== Rotten Food ==		== Rotten Food ==

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 == Dessert first ==
-[[Tins]] can contain [[kobolds]], and kobolds are poisonous. Therefore, tins can contain poisonous foods, no?   [[User:Qwip|Qwip]] 15:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
+[[Tins]] can contain [[kobold]]s, and kobolds are poisonous. Therefore, tins can contain poisonous foods, no?   [[User:Qwip|Qwip]] 15:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 Could you wiztest it? From [[tin]] "Tinning makes poisonous and rotten corpses safe, however, as your character picks out the (sometimes surprisingly few) good bits for the tin." [[User:Spazm|Spazm]] 15:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:29, 16 January 2023
Line 69:		Line 69:

	According to first table "List of comestibles", a K-ration has higher nutrition/weight than C-ration and later under "Food strategy / Food priority" this is reversed! Which one is correct? --[[User:Tonttu3\|Tonttu3]] ([[User talk:Tonttu3\|talk]]) 09:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)		According to first table "List of comestibles", a K-ration has higher nutrition/weight than C-ration and later under "Food strategy / Food priority" this is reversed! Which one is correct? --[[User:Tonttu3\|Tonttu3]] ([[User talk:Tonttu3\|talk]]) 09:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
−	* This is not reversed. K-rations have higher nutrition/weight ratio, therefore they have higher number in the list. --[[User:Nethacker1\|Nethacker1]] ([[User talk:Nethacker1\|talk]]) 12:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)	+	: I don't see any contradiction. K-rations have higher nutrition/weight ratio, therefore they have higher number in the list. The list is sorted from lowest to highest ratio. --[[User:Nethacker1\|Nethacker1]] ([[User talk:Nethacker1\|talk]]) 12:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC), edited --[[User:Nethacker1\|Nethacker1]] ([[User talk:Nethacker1\|talk]]) 12:29, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:28, 16 January 2023
Line 69:		Line 69:

	According to first table "List of comestibles", a K-ration has higher nutrition/weight than C-ration and later under "Food strategy / Food priority" this is reversed! Which one is correct? --[[User:Tonttu3\|Tonttu3]] ([[User talk:Tonttu3\|talk]]) 09:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)		According to first table "List of comestibles", a K-ration has higher nutrition/weight than C-ration and later under "Food strategy / Food priority" this is reversed! Which one is correct? --[[User:Tonttu3\|Tonttu3]] ([[User talk:Tonttu3\|talk]]) 09:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
		+	* This is not reversed. K-rations have higher nutrition/weight ratio, therefore they have higher number in the list. --[[User:Nethacker1\|Nethacker1]] ([[User talk:Nethacker1\|talk]]) 12:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 16 January 2023
Line 65:		Line 65:
	Your pear wasn't going to rot away to nothing, however long you left it.		Your pear wasn't going to rot away to nothing, however long you left it.
	More generally, the "Rotten food" section of the article is mostly accurate. --[[User:Hoanwan\|Hoanwan]] ([[User talk:Hoanwan\|talk]]) 01:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)		More generally, the "Rotten food" section of the article is mostly accurate. --[[User:Hoanwan\|Hoanwan]] ([[User talk:Hoanwan\|talk]]) 01:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Optimal nutrition / weight ==
		+
		+	According to first table "List of comestibles", a K-ration has higher nutrition/weight than C-ration and later under "Food strategy / Food priority" this is reversed! Which one is correct? --[[User:Tonttu3\|Tonttu3]] ([[User talk:Tonttu3\|talk]]) 09:31, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 [[User:WarriorX90|WarriorX90]] ([[User talk:WarriorX90|talk]]) 12:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 Your pear wasn't going to rot away to nothing, however long you left it.
 More generally, the "Rotten food" section of the article is mostly accurate. --[[User:Hoanwan|Hoanwan]] ([[User talk:Hoanwan|talk]]) 01:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:09, 17 October 2017
Line 62:		Line 62:

	[[User:WarriorX90\|WarriorX90]] ([[User talk:WarriorX90\|talk]]) 12:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)		[[User:WarriorX90\|WarriorX90]] ([[User talk:WarriorX90\|talk]]) 12:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
		+	Your pear wasn't going to rot away to nothing, however long you left it.
		+
		+	More generally, the "Rotten food" section of the article is mostly accurate. --[[User:Hoanwan\|Hoanwan]] ([[User talk:Hoanwan\|talk]]) 01:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 16 October 2017
Line 59:		Line 59:
	== Rotten Pear ==		== Rotten Pear ==

−	I thought everything except eggs was permafood, but a pear I ate was rotten (Nethack 3.6.0 at NAO)[[User:WarriorX90\|WarriorX90]] ([[User talk:WarriorX90\|talk]]) 12:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)	+	I thought everything except eggs was permafood, but a pear I ate was rotten (Nethack 3.6.0 at NAO)
		+
		+	[[User:WarriorX90\|WarriorX90]] ([[User talk:WarriorX90\|talk]]) 12:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 16 October 2017
Line 56:		Line 56:

	: You lose one point of nutrition per turn (and some extra for rings, amulets, jumping, spellcasting, unless asleep, and a boatload of other special cases). Blessed food is not more nutritious; however, blessed corpses can be a bit older before they start getting harmful. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 12:27, November 14, 2009 (UTC)		: You lose one point of nutrition per turn (and some extra for rings, amulets, jumping, spellcasting, unless asleep, and a boatload of other special cases). Blessed food is not more nutritious; however, blessed corpses can be a bit older before they start getting harmful. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 12:27, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Rotten Pear ==
		+
		+	I thought everything except eggs was permafood, but a pear I ate was rotten (Nethack 3.6.0 at NAO)[[User:WarriorX90\|WarriorX90]] ([[User talk:WarriorX90\|talk]]) 12:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 14 August 2010
Line 41:		Line 41:

	Is the chance of food being rotten affected by [[luck]]? Playing [[Friday the 13th\|yesterday]] I seemed to be getting bad food very frequently; which is then exacerbated because I couldn't pray for help.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 16:31, August 14, 2010 (UTC)		Is the chance of food being rotten affected by [[luck]]? Playing [[Friday the 13th\|yesterday]] I seemed to be getting bad food very frequently; which is then exacerbated because I couldn't pray for help.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 16:31, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
		+	:Rotten or tainted? Rotten food I can't see requiring prayer, as it results in confusion, blindness, or unconciousness (which you can't pray for). Rotten food has a 1 in 7 chance of happening, and is unaffected by luck; same with the actual effects of the food.
		+	:Tainted food is also unaffected by luck. There is a small bit of randomness involved, but it calls rn2, not rnl. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:43, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

	== Intrinsics from rotten food==		== Intrinsics from rotten food==