Talk:Curse items - Revision history

Ozymandias: /* UnNetHack */

2013-08-29T16:10:25Z

UnNetHack

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 29 August 2013
Line 16:		Line 16:
	</pre>		</pre>

	~~Based on this, it doesn't look like it~~ will recurse - ~~since right now only rndcurse~~() ~~knows what to do if~~ it ~~hits~~ a ~~container. However~~, ~~recursion in that situation~~ is the ~~desired behavior. I'll talk to the other devs - it is probably a quick fix~~.		It will recurse - the above code is within curse_objects() so when it is called on the contents of a bag, this check is run again on the contents.


	--[[User:Ozymandias\|Ozymandias]] ([[User talk:Ozymandias\|talk]]) 16:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)		--[[User:Ozymandias\|Ozymandias]] ([[User talk:Ozymandias\|talk]]) 16:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Ozymandias: /* UnNetHack */

2013-08-29T16:04:49Z

UnNetHack

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 29 August 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:
	one random item inside the bag is cursed instead.		one random item inside the bag is cursed instead.
	If the random item is a cursed container does it recurse? --[[Special:Contributions/194.116.198.185\|194.116.198.185]] 11:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)		If the random item is a cursed container does it recurse? --[[Special:Contributions/194.116.198.185\|194.116.198.185]] 11:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

			<pre>
			else if (otmp->cursed) {
			if (Is_container(otmp))
			curse_objects(otmp->cobj, 1, FALSE);
			continue;
			}
			</pre>

			Based on this, it doesn't look like it will recurse - since right now only rndcurse() knows what to do if it hits a container. However, recursion in that situation is the desired behavior. I'll talk to the other devs - it is probably a quick fix.

			--[[User:Ozymandias\|Ozymandias]] ([[User talk:Ozymandias\|talk]]) 16:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

194.116.198.185: code-diving question: If the random item is a cursed container does it recurse? (bag/container use should be made consistent, too, damn)

2013-08-29T11:36:16Z

code-diving question: If the random item is a cursed container does it recurse? (bag/container use should be made consistent, too, damn)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:36, 29 August 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: "touch", just as melee. Gaze attacks are really an odd exception in Nethack as they do no even adher to the cardinal directions restriction. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:23, 15 June 2009 (UTC)		: "touch", just as melee. Gaze attacks are really an odd exception in Nethack as they do no even adher to the cardinal directions restriction. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:23, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

			==UnNetHack==
			In UnNetHack, if Curse Items targets an already cursed container,
			one random item inside the bag is cursed instead.
			If the random item is a cursed container does it recurse? --[[Special:Contributions/194.116.198.185\|194.116.198.185]] 11:36, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Tjr at 20:23, 15 June 2009

2009-06-15T20:23:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 15 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is the curse items spell (as cast by, say, arch-lich), ranged or touch? If ranged is it some sort of ray or can you be hit regardless of where you stand (as in, can you be hit from a knight's jump away)? I only ask because I've tried to avoid pyrolisk glares by keeping a knight's jump away but it still burned up my cloak (I was fast and its speed is only 6) so that get me thinking that maybe some monster attacks aren't "select direction," but rather "select target." But I may not have kept the right distance the entire time so maybe I'm wrong on that. [[User:DemonDoll\|DemonDoll]] 17:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)		Is the curse items spell (as cast by, say, arch-lich), ranged or touch? If ranged is it some sort of ray or can you be hit regardless of where you stand (as in, can you be hit from a knight's jump away)? I only ask because I've tried to avoid pyrolisk glares by keeping a knight's jump away but it still burned up my cloak (I was fast and its speed is only 6) so that get me thinking that maybe some monster attacks aren't "select direction," but rather "select target." But I may not have kept the right distance the entire time so maybe I'm wrong on that. [[User:DemonDoll\|DemonDoll]] 17:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

			: "touch", just as melee. Gaze attacks are really an odd exception in Nethack as they do no even adher to the cardinal directions restriction. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 20:23, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

DemonDoll: Created page with 'Is the curse items spell (as cast by, say, arch-lich), ranged or touch? If ranged is it some sort of ray or can you be hit regardless of where you stand (as in, can you be hit fr...'

2009-06-15T17:49:41Z

Created page with 'Is the curse items spell (as cast by, say, arch-lich), ranged or touch? If ranged is it some sort of ray or can you be hit regardless of where you stand (as in, can you be hit fr...'

New page

Is the curse items spell (as cast by, say, arch-lich), ranged or touch? If ranged is it some sort of ray or can you be hit regardless of where you stand (as in, can you be hit from a knight's jump away)? I only ask because I've tried to avoid pyrolisk glares by keeping a knight's jump away but it still burned up my cloak (I was fast and its speed is only 6) so that get me thinking that maybe some monster attacks aren't "select direction," but rather "select target." But I may not have kept the right distance the entire time so maybe I'm wrong on that. [[User:DemonDoll|DemonDoll]] 17:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)