Talk:DNHslex - Revision history

Furey: Remove ascension section? Nah, not yet, but I don't mind if somone else does.

2024-07-02T16:30:39Z

Remove ascension section? Nah, not yet, but I don't mind if somone else does.

Furey: /* SLEX coverage */ DNHslex is not SLEX, and no one has accused it of having "highly inappropriate" or "illegal" content

2024-07-02T16:24:59Z

‎SLEX coverage: DNHslex is not SLEX, and no one has accused it of having "highly inappropriate" or "illegal" content

Umbire the Phantom: /* SLEX coverage */ new section

2022-10-05T02:06:40Z

‎SLEX coverage: new section

Bluescreenofdeath at 09:55, 5 August 2019

2019-08-05T09:55:20Z

Wikid: Yeah!

2019-08-05T09:35:17Z

Yeah!

New page

I find it really good that the Elder Priest takes extra damage when being kicked with high heels. Yeah! Sock it to him! Stale old Patriarch! Grrrr! Bet he drops a toupe. Just saying it. [[User:Wikid|Wikid]] ([[User talk:Wikid|talk]]) 09:35, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 2 July 2024
Line 7:		Line 7:

	: I was not around, but the [[SLEX]] article says NetHackWiki removed coverage of SLEX ''due to some of the new content being highly inappropriate, or in some cases illegal depending on location'', with more details in the talk page. No one has made an accusation that DNHslex has ''highly inappropriate'' or ''illegal'' content. So until someone makes that accusation, and provides evidence for it, NetHackWiki should treat DNHslex the same as any other variant. Just my non-admin opinion. [[User:Furey\|Furey]] ([[User talk:Furey\|talk]]) 16:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)		: I was not around, but the [[SLEX]] article says NetHackWiki removed coverage of SLEX ''due to some of the new content being highly inappropriate, or in some cases illegal depending on location'', with more details in the talk page. No one has made an accusation that DNHslex has ''highly inappropriate'' or ''illegal'' content. So until someone makes that accusation, and provides evidence for it, NetHackWiki should treat DNHslex the same as any other variant. Just my non-admin opinion. [[User:Furey\|Furey]] ([[User talk:Furey\|talk]]) 16:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Remove ascension section? ==
		+
		+	I checked history and put an "as of" date in there. My view is to give it a few more years either for someone to update it (with a URL citation please) or delete it, but I would not object to immediate deletion. [[User:Furey\|Furey]] ([[User talk:Furey\|talk]]) 16:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:24, 2 July 2024
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Since we're cutting 95-99% of the [[SLEX]]-related stuff from here, what '''''exactly''''' should be done with this? --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 02:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)		Since we're cutting 95-99% of the [[SLEX]]-related stuff from here, what '''''exactly''''' should be done with this? --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 02:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
		+
		+	: I was not around, but the [[SLEX]] article says NetHackWiki removed coverage of SLEX ''due to some of the new content being highly inappropriate, or in some cases illegal depending on location'', with more details in the talk page. No one has made an accusation that DNHslex has ''highly inappropriate'' or ''illegal'' content. So until someone makes that accusation, and provides evidence for it, NetHackWiki should treat DNHslex the same as any other variant. Just my non-admin opinion. [[User:Furey\|Furey]] ([[User talk:Furey\|talk]]) 16:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 5 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I find it really good that the Elder Priest takes extra damage when being kicked with high heels. Yeah! Sock it to him! Stale old Patriarch! Grrrr! Bet he drops a toupe. Just saying it. [[User:Wikid\|Wikid]] ([[User talk:Wikid\|talk]]) 09:35, 5 August 2019 (UTC)		I find it really good that the Elder Priest takes extra damage when being kicked with high heels. Yeah! Sock it to him! Stale old Patriarch! Grrrr! Bet he drops a toupe. Just saying it. [[User:Wikid\|Wikid]] ([[User talk:Wikid\|talk]]) 09:35, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
	:Haha, the idea was that on IRC we discussed a possible kryptonite for the elder priest and someone (don't remember who it was) came up with the possibility that he's vulnerable to high heels :) --[[User:Bluescreenofdeath\|Bluescreenofdeath]] ([[User talk:Bluescreenofdeath\|talk]]) 09:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC)		:Haha, the idea was that on IRC we discussed a possible kryptonite for the elder priest and someone (don't remember who it was) came up with the possibility that he's vulnerable to high heels :) --[[User:Bluescreenofdeath\|Bluescreenofdeath]] ([[User talk:Bluescreenofdeath\|talk]]) 09:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	== SLEX coverage ==
		+
		+	Since we're cutting 95-99% of the [[SLEX]]-related stuff from here, what '''''exactly''''' should be done with this? --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 02:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:55, 5 August 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I find it really good that the Elder Priest takes extra damage when being kicked with high heels. Yeah! Sock it to him! Stale old Patriarch! Grrrr! Bet he drops a toupe. Just saying it. [[User:Wikid\|Wikid]] ([[User talk:Wikid\|talk]]) 09:35, 5 August 2019 (UTC)		I find it really good that the Elder Priest takes extra damage when being kicked with high heels. Yeah! Sock it to him! Stale old Patriarch! Grrrr! Bet he drops a toupe. Just saying it. [[User:Wikid\|Wikid]] ([[User talk:Wikid\|talk]]) 09:35, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
		+	:Haha, the idea was that on IRC we discussed a possible kryptonite for the elder priest and someone (don't remember who it was) came up with the possibility that he's vulnerable to high heels :) --[[User:Bluescreenofdeath\|Bluescreenofdeath]] ([[User talk:Bluescreenofdeath\|talk]]) 09:55, 5 August 2019 (UTC)