Talk:Dagger - Revision history

Tone: /* Stacked daggers in melee? */

2019-09-03T23:48:50Z

‎Stacked daggers in melee?

2019-09-03T06:21:00Z

‎Stacked daggers in melee?: new section

2013-11-17T10:19:09Z

‎How many daggers should I carry?

2013-11-16T23:41:49Z

2011-01-06T00:58:39Z

‎6d6 or 1d6?: changed this also

2011-01-06T00:57:26Z

‎Erosion of wooden daggers: noted in text

2011-01-06T00:03:39Z

I don't see whether the SLASHEM team intended to make great daggers stackable or stacks non-upgradable

2011-01-05T23:44:51Z

‎Great dagger stackability: new section

2009-05-19T11:12:08Z

‎Training daggers by throwing

2009-05-19T04:09:55Z

‎Training daggers by throwing: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:48, 3 September 2019
Line 51:		Line 51:

	Something I've been curious about for a long time, but never seen addressed anywhere. If I've got a stack of (say, 3) +1 daggers - are they more effective when striking in melee than a single +1 dagger would be? Or is the damage the same as a single dagger would be, and I should just carry one, saving others as replacements for when the one I'm wielding gets eroded? --[[User:Emdoub\|Emdoub]] ([[User talk:Emdoub\|talk]]) 06:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC)		Something I've been curious about for a long time, but never seen addressed anywhere. If I've got a stack of (say, 3) +1 daggers - are they more effective when striking in melee than a single +1 dagger would be? Or is the damage the same as a single dagger would be, and I should just carry one, saving others as replacements for when the one I'm wielding gets eroded? --[[User:Emdoub\|Emdoub]] ([[User talk:Emdoub\|talk]]) 06:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Wielding multiple daggers confers no benefit. You can use the #adjust command with a "count" prefix to separate the stack and wield only one. --[[User:Tone\|Tone]] ([[User talk:Tone\|talk]]) 23:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:21, 3 September 2019
Line 47:		Line 47:
	== How many daggers should I carry? ==		== How many daggers should I carry? ==
	They are somewhat heavy and never break. --[[Special:Contributions/112.167.170.79\|112.167.170.79]] 23:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)		They are somewhat heavy and never break. --[[Special:Contributions/112.167.170.79\|112.167.170.79]] 23:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Stacked daggers in melee? ==
		+
		+	Something I've been curious about for a long time, but never seen addressed anywhere. If I've got a stack of (say, 3) +1 daggers - are they more effective when striking in melee than a single +1 dagger would be? Or is the damage the same as a single dagger would be, and I should just carry one, saving others as replacements for when the one I'm wielding gets eroded? --[[User:Emdoub\|Emdoub]] ([[User talk:Emdoub\|talk]]) 06:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:19, 17 November 2013
Line 46:		Line 46:

	== How many daggers should I carry? ==		== How many daggers should I carry? ==
−	~~Because they~~ are somewhat heavy and never ~~breaks~~. --[[Special:Contributions/112.167.170.79\|112.167.170.79]] 23:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)	+	They are somewhat heavy and never break. --[[Special:Contributions/112.167.170.79\|112.167.170.79]] 23:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 16 November 2013
Line 44:		Line 44:

	The same contributor cites bug report [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1117174&group_id=9746&atid=109746 "great dagger bunches"], but I don't see whether the SLASHEM team intended to make great daggers stackable or stacks non-upgradable. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 00:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)		The same contributor cites bug report [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1117174&group_id=9746&atid=109746 "great dagger bunches"], but I don't see whether the SLASHEM team intended to make great daggers stackable or stacks non-upgradable. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 00:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== How many daggers should I carry? ==
		+	Because they are somewhat heavy and never breaks. --[[Special:Contributions/112.167.170.79\|112.167.170.79]] 23:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 6 January 2011
Line 30:		Line 30:

	Anyone disagree?		Anyone disagree?
		+
		+	:I've made this change also. --[[User:Ilmari Karonen\|Ilmari Karonen]] 00:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

	== Training daggers by throwing ==		== Training daggers by throwing ==

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 : I have not confirmed it, but from tests in [[wizard mode]] it seems probable. I could not rot an elven dagger by hitting brown puddings, though I could corrode an orcish dagger by hitting black puddings. I could not burn an elven dagger with a [[fire trap]] nor a [[wand of fire]]. In frustration I had a thoroughly burnt, thoroughly rotted elven cloak and two undamaged elven daggers. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 04:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
+:: I've noted this in the text.  (Hey, it only took 4 years!)  I did some quick testing myself, and the only way I found to burn an elven dagger was to dip it in a lit [[potion of oil]].  --[[User:Ilmari Karonen|Ilmari Karonen]] 00:57, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 == Is it just me... ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 6 January 2011
Line 40:		Line 40:

	It's easy to wizmode whether they stack, but how do you know it's by design that they don't? --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]]		It's easy to wizmode whether they stack, but how do you know it's by design that they don't? --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]]
		+
		+	The same contributor cites bug report [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1117174&group_id=9746&atid=109746 "great dagger bunches"], but I don't see whether the SLASHEM team intended to make great daggers stackable or stacks non-upgradable. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 00:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:44, 5 January 2011
Line 36:		Line 36:

	: Yes, and it is the safest (read: recommended) way to do so. However, it feels more cumbersome because you have to run after all those daggers before you can train again. [[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 11:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)		: Yes, and it is the safest (read: recommended) way to do so. However, it feels more cumbersome because you have to run after all those daggers before you can train again. [[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 11:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Great dagger stackability ==
		+
		+	It's easy to wizmode whether they stack, but how do you know it's by design that they don't? --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:12, 19 May 2009
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Does throwing daggers at monsters train the dagger [[skill]] in the same way that meleeing does? [[User:Skelwing\|Skelwing]] 04:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)		Does throwing daggers at monsters train the dagger [[skill]] in the same way that meleeing does? [[User:Skelwing\|Skelwing]] 04:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	: Yes, and it is the safest (read: recommended) way to do so. However, it feels more cumbersome because you have to run after all those daggers before you can train again. [[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 11:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:09, 19 May 2009
Line 30:		Line 30:

	Anyone disagree?		Anyone disagree?
		+
		+	== Training daggers by throwing ==
		+
		+	Does throwing daggers at monsters train the dagger [[skill]] in the same way that meleeing does? [[User:Skelwing\|Skelwing]] 04:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)