Talk:Deferred features - Revision history

Qazmlpok: /* Isn't "x-ray vision" just internal name for astral vision? */

2016-01-21T17:25:23Z

‎Isn't "x-ray vision" just internal name for astral vision?

Qazmlpok: /* Isn't "x-ray vision" just internal name for astral vision? */

2016-01-21T16:50:41Z

‎Isn't "x-ray vision" just internal name for astral vision?

217.197.205.109: /* Isn't "x-ray vision" just internal name for astral vision? */ new section

2016-01-21T16:02:54Z

‎Isn't "x-ray vision" just internal name for astral vision?: new section

Qazmlpok at 13:26, 19 December 2012

2012-12-19T13:26:47Z

Bulwersator: /* "There is code that lets monsters use scrolls of fire as a last-resort offense." */ new section

2012-12-19T11:56:24Z

‎"There is code that lets monsters use scrolls of fire as a last-resort offense.": new section

75.58.124.110: /* Imaginary Widget... */ new section

2011-10-03T21:06:13Z

‎Imaginary Widget...: new section

ZeroOne: Talk:Unimplemented features moved to Talk:Deferred features

2006-08-20T11:33:55Z

Talk:Unimplemented features moved to Talk:Deferred features

ZeroOne: Talk:Deferred features moved to Talk:Unimplemented features: In response to the new defunct features article.

2006-08-20T06:43:02Z

Talk:Deferred features moved to Talk:Unimplemented features: In response to the new defunct features article.

Jayt: not enough obsolete features to make a decent separate page

2006-07-29T09:58:17Z

not enough obsolete features to make a decent separate page

Ray Chason: Do obsolete features belong here?

2006-07-29T05:29:26Z

Do obsolete features belong here?

New page

Perhaps obsolete features ought to have their own page? They seem to be a distinct category from deferred features.[[User:Ray Chason|Ray Chason]] 05:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 21 January 2016
Line 14:		Line 14:

	[[Special:Contributions/217.197.205.109\|217.197.205.109]] 16:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/217.197.205.109\|217.197.205.109]] 16:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
−	Looks like it. Eyes is tagged with SPFX_XRAY, which does u.xray_range = 3;. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 16:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)	+	:Looks like it. Eyes is tagged with SPFX_XRAY, which does u.xray_range = 3;. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 16:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:50, 21 January 2016
Line 14:		Line 14:

	[[Special:Contributions/217.197.205.109\|217.197.205.109]] 16:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)		[[Special:Contributions/217.197.205.109\|217.197.205.109]] 16:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
		+	Looks like it. Eyes is tagged with SPFX_XRAY, which does u.xray_range = 3;. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 16:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:02, 21 January 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Is this code buggy/broken/problematic or is there problem with idea itself? [[User:Bulwersator\|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator\|talk]]) 11:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC)		Is this code buggy/broken/problematic or is there problem with idea itself? [[User:Bulwersator\|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator\|talk]]) 11:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
	:It's compiled out with no comment explaining why. I don't know how the offense code works, so I can't tell if it'd work if the '''#if 0''' was removed or not. Code's at {{sourcecode\|muse.c\|1082}}, for reference. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 13:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC)		:It's compiled out with no comment explaining why. I don't know how the offense code works, so I can't tell if it'd work if the '''#if 0''' was removed or not. Code's at {{sourcecode\|muse.c\|1082}}, for reference. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 13:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Isn't "x-ray vision" just internal name for astral vision? ==
		+
		+	[[Special:Contributions/217.197.205.109\|217.197.205.109]] 16:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, 19 December 2012
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Is this code buggy/broken/problematic or is there problem with idea itself? [[User:Bulwersator\|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator\|talk]]) 11:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC)		Is this code buggy/broken/problematic or is there problem with idea itself? [[User:Bulwersator\|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator\|talk]]) 11:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
		+	:It's compiled out with no comment explaining why. I don't know how the offense code works, so I can't tell if it'd work if the '''#if 0''' was removed or not. Code's at {{sourcecode\|muse.c\|1082}}, for reference. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 13:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:56, 19 December 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:

	The name's obviously a placeholder, but is there a base item type for it yet? [[Special:Contributions/75.58.124.110\|75.58.124.110]] 21:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)		The name's obviously a placeholder, but is there a base item type for it yet? [[Special:Contributions/75.58.124.110\|75.58.124.110]] 21:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== "There is code that lets monsters use scrolls of fire as a last-resort offense." ==
		+
		+	Is this code buggy/broken/problematic or is there problem with idea itself? [[User:Bulwersator\|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator\|talk]]) 11:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:06, 3 October 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Perhaps obsolete features ought to have their own page? They seem to be a distinct category from deferred features.[[User:Ray Chason\|Ray Chason]] 05:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)		Perhaps obsolete features ought to have their own page? They seem to be a distinct category from deferred features.[[User:Ray Chason\|Ray Chason]] 05:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
	:True, but as far as I can tell, there are no other obsolete features still in the code (except a few internal functions). I mentioned them here in the same way I mentioned Disease on the [[Sickness]] page, as a not-to-be-confused-with section. --[[User:Jayt\|Jayt]] 09:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)		:True, but as far as I can tell, there are no other obsolete features still in the code (except a few internal functions). I mentioned them here in the same way I mentioned Disease on the [[Sickness]] page, as a not-to-be-confused-with section. --[[User:Jayt\|Jayt]] 09:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Imaginary Widget... ==
		+
		+	The name's obviously a placeholder, but is there a base item type for it yet? [[Special:Contributions/75.58.124.110\|75.58.124.110]] 21:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:33, 20 August 2006
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 06:43, 20 August 2006
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:58, 29 July 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Perhaps obsolete features ought to have their own page? They seem to be a distinct category from deferred features.[[User:Ray Chason\|Ray Chason]] 05:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)		Perhaps obsolete features ought to have their own page? They seem to be a distinct category from deferred features.[[User:Ray Chason\|Ray Chason]] 05:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
		+	:True, but as far as I can tell, there are no other obsolete features still in the code (except a few internal functions). I mentioned them here in the same way I mentioned Disease on the [[Sickness]] page, as a not-to-be-confused-with section. --[[User:Jayt\|Jayt]] 09:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)