Talk:Disintegrator - Revision history

Tjr: /* variants should get their own headings */ new section

2014-07-05T05:25:53Z

‎variants should get their own headings: new section

Ndwolfwood at 08:50, 16 June 2012

2012-06-16T08:50:53Z

Ion frigate at 19:13, 15 June 2012

2012-06-15T19:13:51Z

Ion frigate at 19:13, 15 June 2012

2012-06-15T19:13:25Z

Ndwolfwood at 22:03, 14 June 2012

2012-06-14T22:03:29Z

Ndwolfwood at 22:26, 13 June 2012

2012-06-13T22:26:40Z

Ion frigate at 20:34, 13 June 2012

2012-06-13T20:34:25Z

Ndwolfwood: Created page with "Since I don't know how to do wizard mode I sacrificed Cleaver for the sake of science to see if a Disintergrator could dissolve artifacts. They can. They also can eat gloves...."

2012-06-13T10:24:14Z

Created page with "Since I don't know how to do wizard mode I sacrificed Cleaver for the sake of science to see if a Disintergrator could dissolve artifacts. They can. They also can eat gloves...."

New page

Since I don't know how to do wizard mode I sacrificed Cleaver for the sake of science to see if a Disintergrator could dissolve artifacts. They can. They also can eat gloves. I put on a junk ring to test and it did not dissolve after I attacked with bare hands. Can anyone confirm whether or not rings are unaffected by the things?
Also every dart i used to attack the disintegrator disappeared. Anyone know if projectiles as a rule dissolve?[[User:Ndwolfwood|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood|talk]]) 10:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:25, 5 July 2014
Line 21:		Line 21:

	I ran into one and tamed it. A tamed disintegrator retains its disintegration attack. [[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 08:50, 16 June 2012 (UTC)		I ran into one and tamed it. A tamed disintegrator retains its disintegration attack. [[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 08:50, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	== variants should get their own headings ==
		+
		+	This article talks about Biodiversity, Unnethack, and Slashem Extended. Each of these have their subtle differences. Can we please separate different games under their own headings? --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 05:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 16 June 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:

	:Provided that the biodiversity patch actually codes monster-monster disintegration melee attacks, it seems like they would be. Actually it seems like taming would be a good way to deal with them in general, whether or not their attacks are useful once tamed - only 20 MR means they won't resist very much. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 19:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)		:Provided that the biodiversity patch actually codes monster-monster disintegration melee attacks, it seems like they would be. Actually it seems like taming would be a good way to deal with them in general, whether or not their attacks are useful once tamed - only 20 MR means they won't resist very much. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 19:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	I ran into one and tamed it. A tamed disintegrator retains its disintegration attack. [[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 08:50, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:13, 15 June 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:
	It seems like they'd be one of the best charecter in the game what are the cons? I am to late into my game to get a pet in order to try it out this time[[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 22:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)		It seems like they'd be one of the best charecter in the game what are the cons? I am to late into my game to get a pet in order to try it out this time[[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 22:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

−	:Provided that the biodiversity patch actually codes monster-monster disintegration melee attacks, it seems like they would be. Actually it seems like taming would be a good way to deal with them in general, whether or not their attacks are useful once tamed - only 20 MR means ~~the~~ won't resist very much. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 19:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)	+	:Provided that the biodiversity patch actually codes monster-monster disintegration melee attacks, it seems like they would be. Actually it seems like taming would be a good way to deal with them in general, whether or not their attacks are useful once tamed - only 20 MR means they won't resist very much. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 19:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:13, 15 June 2012
Line 16:		Line 16:
	ALso am I right in believing that they would retain their disintegration ablity unlike a black dragon?		ALso am I right in believing that they would retain their disintegration ablity unlike a black dragon?
	It seems like they'd be one of the best charecter in the game what are the cons? I am to late into my game to get a pet in order to try it out this time[[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 22:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)		It seems like they'd be one of the best charecter in the game what are the cons? I am to late into my game to get a pet in order to try it out this time[[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 22:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Provided that the biodiversity patch actually codes monster-monster disintegration melee attacks, it seems like they would be. Actually it seems like taming would be a good way to deal with them in general, whether or not their attacks are useful once tamed - only 20 MR means the won't resist very much. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 19:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 14 June 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Every time I hit one it gives me the message "Vip!" ie the second dart hits the disintergrator Vip		Every time I hit one it gives me the message "Vip!" ie the second dart hits the disintergrator Vip
	so I think that Vip indicates the dart is dissolved. [[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 22:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)		so I think that Vip indicates the dart is dissolved. [[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 22:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	I was field testing this during the course of a regular game while I was disintergration resistant thank god. As such I didn't catch that you died if you struck one with your bare hand. WOuldn't they make one of the best pets ever if that attack works on monsters? Only a handful of monsters are disintegration resistant and unlike a cockatrice they have relatively high hit points.
		+
		+	ALso am I right in believing that they would retain their disintegration ablity unlike a black dragon?
		+	It seems like they'd be one of the best charecter in the game what are the cons? I am to late into my game to get a pet in order to try it out this time[[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 22:03, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 13 June 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:What variant are these from? It's not mentioned in the article.		:What variant are these from? It's not mentioned in the article.
	:And yes, it would not surprise at all if these monsters always disintegrated projectiles; not only would that be thematic, but it would also be consistent with the behavior of disenchanters' passive attack, which also affects thrown projectiles. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 20:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)		:And yes, it would not surprise at all if these monsters always disintegrated projectiles; not only would that be thematic, but it would also be consistent with the behavior of disenchanters' passive attack, which also affects thrown projectiles. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 20:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+
		+	I am playing UnNethack and apparently they are from the Biodiversity Patch that UnNethack ported over[[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 22:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	Every time I hit one it gives me the message "Vip!" ie the second dart hits the disintergrator Vip
		+	so I think that Vip indicates the dart is dissolved. [[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 22:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 13 June 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Since I don't know how to do wizard mode I sacrificed Cleaver for the sake of science to see if a Disintergrator could dissolve artifacts. They can. They also can eat gloves. I put on a junk ring to test and it did not dissolve after I attacked with bare hands. Can anyone confirm whether or not rings are unaffected by the things?		Since I don't know how to do wizard mode I sacrificed Cleaver for the sake of science to see if a Disintergrator could dissolve artifacts. They can. They also can eat gloves. I put on a junk ring to test and it did not dissolve after I attacked with bare hands. Can anyone confirm whether or not rings are unaffected by the things?
	Also every dart i used to attack the disintegrator disappeared. Anyone know if projectiles as a rule dissolve?[[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 10:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)		Also every dart i used to attack the disintegrator disappeared. Anyone know if projectiles as a rule dissolve?[[User:Ndwolfwood\|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood\|talk]]) 10:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
		+	:What variant are these from? It's not mentioned in the article.
		+	:And yes, it would not surprise at all if these monsters always disintegrated projectiles; not only would that be thematic, but it would also be consistent with the behavior of disenchanters' passive attack, which also affects thrown projectiles. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 20:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)