Talk:Enlightenment - Revision history

Tjr: the merge worked fine on the talk page - just browser cache didn't

2010-01-11T18:56:23Z

the merge worked fine on the talk page - just browser cache didn't

Tjr: history merge completed.

2010-01-11T18:39:59Z

history merge completed.

Tjr: moved User talk:Fredil Yupigo/Enlightenment to Talk:Enlightenment

2010-01-11T18:07:53Z

moved User talk:Fredil Yupigo/Enlightenment to Talk:Enlightenment

Tjr at 14:28, 5 January 2010

2010-01-05T14:28:16Z

Thomag: /* Change to resistances presentation */ new section

2009-07-15T17:04:42Z

‎Change to resistances presentation: new section

Marcmagus: New page: This is great. I noticed that in giving descriptions of a lot of the attributes as well as their names, it duplicates a lot of the content of the excellent-at-first-glance work at [[Prope...

2008-10-29T19:19:00Z

New page: This is great. I noticed that in giving descriptions of a lot of the attributes as well as their names, it duplicates a lot of the content of the excellent-at-first-glance work at [[Prope...

Fredil Yupigo: /* I'm working on a VERY BIG table for this */

2008-07-19T02:12:24Z

‎I'm working on a VERY BIG table for this

Fredil Yupigo: /* Attributes Displayed */ moving this somewhere else.

2008-07-19T01:59:33Z

‎Attributes Displayed: moving this somewhere else.

Show changes

Fredil Yupigo: /* Attributes Displayed */ wording it a bit better

2008-07-19T01:03:47Z

‎Attributes Displayed: wording it a bit better

Fredil Yupigo: /* Attributes Displayed */ For the love of god.

2008-07-19T01:02:23Z

‎Attributes Displayed: For the love of god.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This is great.  I noticed that in giving descriptions of a lot of the attributes as well as their names, it duplicates a lot of the content of the excellent-at-first-glance work at [[Property]].  Is there a good way to merge the two, or at least make sure they correlate cleanly?  -- [[User:Marcmagus|Marcmagus]] 19:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
-== Change to resistances presentation ==
+=== Change to resistances presentation ===
 I folded all the resistances in [[User:Fredil_Yupigo/Enlightenment | the enlightenment table]] into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean).  It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition.  If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read.
 [[User:Thomag|Thomag]] 17:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:39, 11 January 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	I folded all the resistances in [[User:Fredil_Yupigo/Enlightenment \| the enlightenment table]] into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean). It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition. If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read.		I folded all the resistances in [[User:Fredil_Yupigo/Enlightenment \| the enlightenment table]] into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean). It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition. If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read.
	[[User:Thomag\|Thomag]] 17:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)		[[User:Thomag\|Thomag]] 17:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Move completed==
		+	I have finished history merging the article from Fredil Yupigo/Enlightenment and reverted to the last version before the merge template was added. However, I somehow mangled up the talk page, and the main namespace's talk page does not show up in the history. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 18:39, January 11, 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== I'm working on a VERY BIG table for this ==
+This is great.  I noticed that in giving descriptions of a lot of the attributes as well as their names, it duplicates a lot of the content of the excellent-at-first-glance work at [[Property]].  Is there a good way to merge the two, or at least make sure they correlate cleanly?  -- [[User:Marcmagus|Marcmagus]] 19:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
-Enumerating all possible messages and their meanings.
+== Change to resistances presentation ==
-Didn't realise quite how many there were when i started...
+I folded all the resistances in [[User:Fredil_Yupigo/Enlightenment | the enlightenment table]] into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean).  It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition.  If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read.
+[[User:Thomag|Thomag]] 17:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-This is great.  I noticed that in giving descriptions of a lot of the attributes as well as their names, it duplicates a lot of the content of the excellent-at-first-glance work at [[Property]].  Is there a good way to merge the two, or at least make sure they correlate cleanly?  -- [[User:Marcmagus|Marcmagus]] 19:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
+== I'm working on a VERY BIG table for this ==
-== Change to resistances presentation ==
+Enumerating all possible messages and their meanings.
-I folded all the resistances in [[User:Fredil_Yupigo/Enlightenment | the enlightenment table]] into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean).  It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition.  If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read.
+Didn't realise quite how many there were when i started...
-[[User:Thomag|Thomag]] 17:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 15 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This is great. I noticed that in giving descriptions of a lot of the attributes as well as their names, it duplicates a lot of the content of the excellent-at-first-glance work at [[Property]]. Is there a good way to merge the two, or at least make sure they correlate cleanly? -- [[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 19:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)		This is great. I noticed that in giving descriptions of a lot of the attributes as well as their names, it duplicates a lot of the content of the excellent-at-first-glance work at [[Property]]. Is there a good way to merge the two, or at least make sure they correlate cleanly? -- [[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 19:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Change to resistances presentation ==
		+
		+	I folded all the resistances in [[User:Fredil_Yupigo/Enlightenment \| the enlightenment table]] into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean). It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition. If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read.
		+	[[User:Thomag\|Thomag]] 17:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 29 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	== I~~'m working on~~ a ~~VERY BIG table for this ==~~	+	This is great. I noticed that in giving descriptions of a lot of the attributes as well as their names, it duplicates a lot of the content of the excellent-at-first-glance work at [[Property]]. Is there a good way to merge the two, or at least make sure they correlate cleanly? -- [[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 19:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
−
−	~~Enumerating all possible messages and~~ their ~~meanings.~~
−
−	~~Didn't realise quite how many there were when i started...~~
−
−	~~--[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 00:12~~, ~~25 May 2008 (UTC)~~
−
−	~~This has rather stalled and~~ it ~~seems others want to contribute, so I'm putting~~ the ~~work to date here. It can be put on~~ the ~~main page when it's completed.~~
−
−	--[[~~User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO~~]] ~~10:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)~~
−
−	~~: I have moved it to my userspace, as it seems more appropriate that~~ a ~~draft be done there. When it is done, I will move it~~ to the ~~main article. Anyone who wishes to contribute is welcome.~~ [[User:~~Fredil Yupigo~~\|~~Fredil Yupigo~~]] 02:12, ~~19 July~~ 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:12, 19 July 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:

	--[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 10:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		--[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 10:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	: I have moved it to my userspace, as it seems more appropriate that a draft be done there. When it is done, I will move it to the main article. Anyone who wishes to contribute is welcome. [[User:Fredil Yupigo\|Fredil Yupigo]] 02:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
   ![[Sickness resistance]]
   | "You are immune to sickness"
-  | You have [[Sickness resistance]] and cannot get [[food poisoning]] or [[disease]]
+  | You have [[Sickness resistance]], and therefore cannot get [[food poisoning]] or [[disease]]
   |-
   ![[Magic resistance]]

@@ Line 274: / Line 274: @@
   | "You are very fast."
   | Your speed is 20. If you are polymorphed into a slower monster and have quaffed a [[potion of speed]] or are wearing (if possible) [[speed boots]], this will still be displayed even though it will not actually do anything.
   ![[Reflection]]
   |-