Talk:Glass - Revision history

Fredil Yupigo at 01:50, 13 March 2008

2008-03-13T01:50:52Z

76.22.123.186 at 06:21, 7 March 2008

2008-03-07T06:21:39Z

67.160.118.193: uhh....

2008-02-07T06:09:41Z

uhh....

Stefanor: Nope. Better luck next exploit!

2006-10-19T22:57:21Z

Nope. Better luck next exploit!

Someone Else at 13:40, 19 October 2006

2006-10-19T13:40:15Z

New page

Hmm, wait. Could zapping force bolt at gems be an easy way to distinguish between useless glass and expensive stones? --[[User:Someone Else|Someone Else]] 13:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:50, 13 March 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:::'fraid not. They're considered "gems" as far as their class is concerned.[[User:76.22.123.186\|76.22.123.186]] 06:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)		:::'fraid not. They're considered "gems" as far as their class is concerned.[[User:76.22.123.186\|76.22.123.186]] 06:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::What if we throw it at a wall? [[User:Fredil Yupigo\|Fredil Yupigo]] 01:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:21, 7 March 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::In other words, yes? --[[User:67.160.118.193\|67.160.118.193]] 06:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)		::In other words, yes? --[[User:67.160.118.193\|67.160.118.193]] 06:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::'fraid not. They're considered "gems" as far as their class is concerned.[[User:76.22.123.186\|76.22.123.186]] 06:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:09, 7 February 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Sorry, it seems the DevTeam has already thought of that. Force bolt calls breaks() at [[zap.c#line1552]], at [[dothrow.c#line1630]] all glass objects '''except''' gems and artifacts are breakable. --[[User:Stefanor\|Stefanor]] 22:57, 19 October 2006 (UTC)		:Sorry, it seems the DevTeam has already thought of that. Force bolt calls breaks() at [[zap.c#line1552]], at [[dothrow.c#line1630]] all glass objects '''except''' gems and artifacts are breakable. --[[User:Stefanor\|Stefanor]] 22:57, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	::In other words, yes? --[[User:67.160.118.193\|67.160.118.193]] 06:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 19 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hmm, wait. Could zapping force bolt at gems be an easy way to distinguish between useless glass and expensive stones? --[[User:Someone Else\|Someone Else]] 13:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)		Hmm, wait. Could zapping force bolt at gems be an easy way to distinguish between useless glass and expensive stones? --[[User:Someone Else\|Someone Else]] 13:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Sorry, it seems the DevTeam has already thought of that. Force bolt calls breaks() at [[zap.c#line1552]], at [[dothrow.c#line1630]] all glass objects '''except''' gems and artifacts are breakable. --[[User:Stefanor\|Stefanor]] 22:57, 19 October 2006 (UTC)