Talk:Healer - Revision history

Testbutt: /* One interesting note joke. */ new section

2021-04-28T19:20:39Z

One interesting note joke.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:20, 28 April 2021
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::Ok, I have explicitly pointed out that Healers are reasonably good with daggers and completely hopeless with most big warrior weapons. [[User:Ekaterin\|Ekaterin]] 09:07, 18 August 2006 (UTC)		::Ok, I have explicitly pointed out that Healers are reasonably good with daggers and completely hopeless with most big warrior weapons. [[User:Ekaterin\|Ekaterin]] 09:07, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

			== One interesting note joke. ==

			<spicyCebolla> (''quote from previous version of Healer article'') One interesting note is that with 18 wisdom and sufficiently high experience level and healing skill, Healers can cast their special spell (cure sickness) at 0% failure rate, even while wearing metallic body armor and no robe.

			<@luxidream> One interesting note is that with 23 intelligence and a robe, Barbarians can potentially cast level 6 spells such as polymorph and create familiar. <@luxidream> Thus, their spellcasting ability should not be underestimated.
			[[User:Testbutt\|Testbutt]] ([[User talk:Testbutt\|talk]]) 19:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Ekaterin at 09:07, 18 August 2006

2006-08-18T09:07:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:07, 18 August 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	competent at the use of [[digging tool]]s in [[anger]].		competent at the use of [[digging tool]]s in [[anger]].
	:It may not be a powerful weapon, but them Healers knows where to cut! ;-) [[User:GreyKnight\|GreyKnight]] 15:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)		:It may not be a powerful weapon, but them Healers knows where to cut! ;-) [[User:GreyKnight\|GreyKnight]] 15:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

			::Ok, I have explicitly pointed out that Healers are reasonably good with daggers and completely hopeless with most big warrior weapons. [[User:Ekaterin\|Ekaterin]] 09:07, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

GreyKnight at 15:34, 17 August 2006

2006-08-17T15:34:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 17 August 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Healers are good with [[scalpel]]s. They aren't even vaguely		Healers are good with [[scalpel]]s. They aren't even vaguely
	competent at the use of [[digging tool]]s in [[anger]].		competent at the use of [[digging tool]]s in [[anger]].
			:It may not be a powerful weapon, but them Healers knows where to cut! ;-) [[User:GreyKnight\|GreyKnight]] 15:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

N8chz: caveat

2006-08-17T15:21:22Z

caveat

New page

<blockquote>Their starting scalpel is a very poor weapon, and it is a good idea to replace it with the first noncursed dagger they find, going from orcish to normal to elven in that order, then later with a unicorn horn (with which they can achieve Expert skill).</blockquote>

A [[tool]] (or [[weapon]]) is as good as its applicator (or wielder).
Healers are good with [[scalpel]]s. They aren't even vaguely
competent at the use of [[digging tool]]s in [[anger]].