Talk:Hungerless casting - Revision history

Tjr at 10:32, 18 November 2009

2009-11-18T10:32:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:32, 18 November 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	The table describes a X% penalty for various INT levels - is that on top of the "normal hunger" described in the table below? -[[Special:Contributions/208.97.245.131\|208.97.245.131]] 00:57, November 18, 2009 (UTC)		The table describes a X% penalty for various INT levels - is that on top of the "normal hunger" described in the table below? -[[Special:Contributions/208.97.245.131\|208.97.245.131]] 00:57, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

			: No. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 10:32, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

208.97.245.131: /* I don't really understand how this works */ new section

2009-11-18T00:57:53Z

I don't really understand how this works: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:57, 18 November 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	As of 0.0.8E0F1, spell.c, line 872 still only switches for PM_WIZARD. If SLASH'EM has overloaded PM_WIZARD, then this would work, but a quick skimming of role.c says that PM_WIZARD remains the property of the people who play as wizards.		As of 0.0.8E0F1, spell.c, line 872 still only switches for PM_WIZARD. If SLASH'EM has overloaded PM_WIZARD, then this would work, but a quick skimming of role.c says that PM_WIZARD remains the property of the people who play as wizards.
	-- Gaunt		-- Gaunt

			== I don't really understand how this works ==

			The table describes a X% penalty for various INT levels - is that on top of the "normal hunger" described in the table below? -[[Special:Contributions/208.97.245.131\|208.97.245.131]] 00:57, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

69.255.119.79: /* What about SLASH'EM? */

2009-10-16T23:55:08Z

What about SLASH'EM?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:55, 16 October 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I'd think many other classes in it, such as Necromancers and Flame/Ice Mages, would have this as well. Could anyone tell me?		I'd think many other classes in it, such as Necromancers and Flame/Ice Mages, would have this as well. Could anyone tell me?

			--
	As of 0.0.8E0F1, spell.c, line 872 still only switches for PM_WIZARD. If SLASH'EM has overloaded PM_WIZARD, then this would work, but a quick skimming of role.c says that PM_WIZARD remains the property of the people who play as wizards.		As of 0.0.8E0F1, spell.c, line 872 still only switches for PM_WIZARD. If SLASH'EM has overloaded PM_WIZARD, then this would work, but a quick skimming of role.c says that PM_WIZARD remains the property of the people who play as wizards.
			-- Gaunt

69.255.119.79: /* What about SLASH'EM? */

2009-10-16T23:54:46Z

What about SLASH'EM?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:54, 16 October 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I'd think many other classes in it, such as Necromancers and Flame/Ice Mages, would have this as well. Could anyone tell me?		I'd think many other classes in it, such as Necromancers and Flame/Ice Mages, would have this as well. Could anyone tell me?

			As of 0.0.8E0F1, spell.c, line 872 still only switches for PM_WIZARD. If SLASH'EM has overloaded PM_WIZARD, then this would work, but a quick skimming of role.c says that PM_WIZARD remains the property of the people who play as wizards.

84.250.246.11: New page: == What about SLASH'EM? == I'd think many other classes in it, such as Necromancers and Flame/Ice Mages, would have this as well. Could anyone tell me?

2007-11-20T15:16:53Z

New page: == What about SLASH'EM? == I'd think many other classes in it, such as Necromancers and Flame/Ice Mages, would have this as well. Could anyone tell me?

New page

== What about SLASH'EM? ==

I'd think many other classes in it, such as Necromancers and Flame/Ice Mages, would have this as well. Could anyone tell me?