Talk:Izchak - Revision history

Unmywhin: Thanks

2024-05-19T23:32:46Z

Thanks

Umbire the Phantom: /* Lighting Shop Inventory */ reply

2024-05-19T06:36:24Z

‎Lighting Shop Inventory: reply

Unmywhin: /* Lighting Shop Inventory */ new section

2024-05-18T15:37:55Z

‎Lighting Shop Inventory: new section

Qazmlpok at 01:33, 12 December 2015

2015-12-12T01:33:51Z

Qazmlpok: /* opinion of certain #nethack'ers */ adding nowiki

2010-09-14T23:41:28Z

‎opinion of certain #nethack'ers: adding nowiki

DemonSlayerThe3rd: /* opinion of certain #nethack'ers */

2010-09-14T22:29:04Z

‎opinion of certain #nethack'ers

Feagradze: /* Technical enforcement? */

2010-07-03T22:48:12Z

‎Technical enforcement?

84.70.139.69: /* opinion of certain #nethack'ers */

2009-06-11T13:19:22Z

‎opinion of certain #nethack'ers

GreyKnight: reflow!

2008-08-11T09:55:18Z

reflow!

24.22.240.16 at 04:12, 3 July 2008

2008-07-03T04:12:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:32, 19 May 2024
Line 29:		Line 29:

	[[Shop#Table of shops\|Try this.]] --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)		[[Shop#Table of shops\|Try this.]] --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Thanks. [[User:Unmywhin\|Unmywhin]] ([[User talk:Unmywhin\|talk]]) 23:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:36, 19 May 2024
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Does anyone have a list of all the items that the lighting shop will sell? It at least helps new users figure out which 'potion' is actually oil. [[User:Unmywhin\|Unmywhin]] ([[User talk:Unmywhin\|talk]]) 15:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)		Does anyone have a list of all the items that the lighting shop will sell? It at least helps new users figure out which 'potion' is actually oil. [[User:Unmywhin\|Unmywhin]] ([[User talk:Unmywhin\|talk]]) 15:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
		+
		+	[[Shop#Table of shops\|Try this.]] --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 18 May 2024
Line 23:		Line 23:

	Non-Izchak candlestore shopkeepers will simply say "I won't stock that. Take it out of here!", but I'm pretty sure those don't exist in vanilla. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 01:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)		Non-Izchak candlestore shopkeepers will simply say "I won't stock that. Take it out of here!", but I'm pretty sure those don't exist in vanilla. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 01:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Lighting Shop Inventory ==
		+
		+	Does anyone have a list of all the items that the lighting shop will sell? It at least helps new users figure out which 'potion' is actually oil. [[User:Unmywhin\|Unmywhin]] ([[User talk:Unmywhin\|talk]]) 15:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:33, 12 December 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:
	: There isn't any code enforcing this rule. It's purely an etiquette consideration. --[[User:GreyKnight\|GreyKnight]] 08:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)		: There isn't any code enforcing this rule. It's purely an etiquette consideration. --[[User:GreyKnight\|GreyKnight]] 08:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
	: Well, not your ''player'', no. But ''you'' will get eaten by a grue if you do. ''Bad karma.'' [[User:Feagradze\|Feagradze]] 22:48, July 3, 2010 (UTC)		: Well, not your ''player'', no. But ''you'' will get eaten by a grue if you do. ''Bad karma.'' [[User:Feagradze\|Feagradze]] 22:48, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== 3.6.0 changes ==
		+	3.6.0 adds some extra dialogue to Izchak if you try to sell him the candellabrum before performing the invocation. "No thanks, I'd hang onto that if I were you.", plus if it doesn't have enough candles, "You'll need {num} (more) candle(s) to go along with it.", where num is 7 minus the current number of attached candles.
		+
		+	Non-Izchak candlestore shopkeepers will simply say "I won't stock that. Take it out of here!", but I'm pretty sure those don't exist in vanilla. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 01:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 ::Indeed. Does inventing the baseball bat make it okay for you to be clocked upside the head with one? No, of course not. Come on, man. Izchak made a lot of things possible. Just give him the respect he deserves. I mean, stealing from him's like stealing from his memorial... statue. Thing. Shopkeeper. Whatever. Lame. --[[Special:Contributions/24.22.240.16|24.22.240.16]] 04:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
-:#nethack don't always come up with the best ideas. This is one of those times! --[[User:GreyKnight|GreyKnight]] 09:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
+:<nowiki>#</nowiki>nethack don't always come up with the best ideas. This is one of those times! --[[User:GreyKnight|GreyKnight]] 09:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 ::If you're actually role playing a chaotic character then not only should you not be bound by etiquette, it would make perfect sense to desecrate any and all memorials for the joy of chaos. Lawful characters shouldn't steal from anyone, but I guess neutral characters should respect him for game balance.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 == opinion of certain #nethack'ers ==
-The question came up in #nethack about whether it was actually poor form to steal from Izchak, and the consensus was that as it's his code that makes shk theft possible, it's not actually poor form or rude or whatever.  Shrug.  Just putting that out there --[[User:Derekstiles|Derekstiles]] 01:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
+The question came up in #nethack about whether it was actually poor form to steal from Izchak, and the consensus was that as it's his code that makes shk theft possible, it's not actually poor form or rude or whatever. Shrug. Just putting that out there --[[User:Derekstiles|Derekstiles]] 01:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
-:Half of #nethack's population weren't even born in 1994, probably.  And I wouldn't personally take their advice on what is and is not rude; I've been there.  Not that RGRN is any better, but... --[[User:192.193.245.16|192.193.245.16]] 08:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
+:Half of #nethack's population weren't even born in 1994, probably. And I wouldn't personally take their advice on what is and is not rude; I've been there. Not that RGRN is any better, but... --[[User:192.193.245.16|192.193.245.16]] 08:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
-::Indeed.  Does inventing the baseball bat make it okay for you to be clocked upside the head with one?  No, of course not.  Come on, man.  Izchak made a lot of things possible.  Just give him the respect he deserves.  I mean, stealing from him's like stealing from his memorial... statue.  Thing.  Shopkeeper.  Whatever.  Lame. --[[Special:Contributions/24.22.240.16|24.22.240.16]] 04:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
+::Indeed. Does inventing the baseball bat make it okay for you to be clocked upside the head with one? No, of course not. Come on, man. Izchak made a lot of things possible. Just give him the respect he deserves. I mean, stealing from him's like stealing from his memorial... statue. Thing. Shopkeeper. Whatever. Lame. --[[Special:Contributions/24.22.240.16|24.22.240.16]] 04:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
-:#nethack don't always come up with the best ideas.  This is one of those times!  --[[User:GreyKnight|GreyKnight]] 09:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 ::If you're actually role playing a chaotic character then not only should you not be bound by etiquette, it would make perfect sense to desecrate any and all memorials for the joy of chaos. Lawful characters shouldn't steal from anyone, but I guess neutral characters should respect him for game balance.
 == Technical enforcement? ==

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 == Technical enforcement? ==
 I think it might be a good idea to include information on whether there is any actual ramifications (outside the usual alignment ones) from stealing from/killing Izchak. How about trying to sacrifice his body? Any Izchak-specific code? Just a thought [[User:194.197.164.130|194.197.164.130]] 12:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
-: There isn't any code enforcing this rule.  It's purely an etiquette consideration. --[[User:GreyKnight|GreyKnight]] 08:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
+: There isn't any code enforcing this rule. It's purely an etiquette consideration. --[[User:GreyKnight|GreyKnight]] 08:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)