Talk:Kicking boots - Revision history

Actual-nh: /* Weaponless conduct, martial arts? */ new section

2021-05-22T17:29:27Z

‎Weaponless conduct, martial arts?: new section

Bradfang: /* Kicked dwarf reeled */

2017-07-21T06:38:51Z

‎Kicked dwarf reeled

Bradfang: /* Kicked dwarf reeled */ new section

2017-07-21T06:32:10Z

‎Kicked dwarf reeled: new section

62.63.90.44: [m] clarify

2015-12-20T17:26:08Z

[m] clarify

62.63.90.44 at 17:25, 20 December 2015

2015-12-20T17:25:05Z

Qazmlpok: Weight id

2015-12-20T13:55:56Z

Weight id

Tjr: better methods to ID them

2011-03-20T17:28:09Z

better methods to ID them

Qazmlpok: /* Identification by Ouch! */

2011-03-16T16:26:11Z

‎Identification by Ouch!

AileTheAlien: /* Identification by Ouch! */ new section

2011-03-16T15:52:44Z

‎Identification by Ouch!: new section

Addps4cat: yep +5

2007-10-11T14:05:42Z

yep +5

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:29, 22 May 2021
Line 28:		Line 28:

	edit I see that the "kicking" page references this effect (actually knocks an enemy back), which is brought about either with martial arts skill or kicking boots, so am changing my edit correspondingly (and assuming the effect was not introduced in 3.6.0).		edit I see that the "kicking" page references this effect (actually knocks an enemy back), which is brought about either with martial arts skill or kicking boots, so am changing my edit correspondingly (and assuming the effect was not introduced in 3.6.0).
		+
		+	== Weaponless conduct, martial arts? ==
		+
		+	A further use would appear to be weaponless conduct (including use of martial arts). -[[User:Actual-nh\|Actual-nh]] ([[User talk:Actual-nh\|talk]]) 17:29, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:38, 21 July 2017
Line 26:		Line 26:

	I was playing a strength 18 barbarian, and kicked a dwarf with unidentified boots that I believe are kicking (cost 12 with low charisma), and the dwarf "reeled" and didn't attack me. I added an edit about this, but am an amateur. Consequently, I am making this comment so someone else might confirm and/or refine my addition. Thanks.		I was playing a strength 18 barbarian, and kicked a dwarf with unidentified boots that I believe are kicking (cost 12 with low charisma), and the dwarf "reeled" and didn't attack me. I added an edit about this, but am an amateur. Consequently, I am making this comment so someone else might confirm and/or refine my addition. Thanks.
		+
		+	edit I see that the "kicking" page references this effect (actually knocks an enemy back), which is brought about either with martial arts skill or kicking boots, so am changing my edit correspondingly (and assuming the effect was not introduced in 3.6.0).

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:32, 21 July 2017
Line 20:		Line 20:

	:I should've read the source before posting that. Sorry. [[Special:Contributions/62.63.90.44\|62.63.90.44]] 17:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC)		:I should've read the source before posting that. Sorry. [[Special:Contributions/62.63.90.44\|62.63.90.44]] 17:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Kicked dwarf reeled ==
		+
		+	Hello,
		+
		+	I was playing a strength 18 barbarian, and kicked a dwarf with unidentified boots that I believe are kicking (cost 12 with low charisma), and the dwarf "reeled" and didn't attack me. I added an edit about this, but am an amateur. Consequently, I am making this comment so someone else might confirm and/or refine my addition. Thanks.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 20 December 2015
Line 19:		Line 19:
	A recent edit adds "NetHack 3.6.0 allows to see weights in the interface". Isn't this only true for wizard mode, or is it possible to view weight outside of that as well and I just haven't found the option? -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 13:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)		A recent edit adds "NetHack 3.6.0 allows to see weights in the interface". Isn't this only true for wizard mode, or is it possible to view weight outside of that as well and I just haven't found the option? -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 13:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

−	:~~Should~~'ve read the source before posting that. Sorry. [[Special:Contributions/62.63.90.44\|62.63.90.44]] 17:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC)	+	:I should've read the source before posting that. Sorry. [[Special:Contributions/62.63.90.44\|62.63.90.44]] 17:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 20 December 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:
	==3.6.0 and weight==		==3.6.0 and weight==
	A recent edit adds "NetHack 3.6.0 allows to see weights in the interface". Isn't this only true for wizard mode, or is it possible to view weight outside of that as well and I just haven't found the option? -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 13:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)		A recent edit adds "NetHack 3.6.0 allows to see weights in the interface". Isn't this only true for wizard mode, or is it possible to view weight outside of that as well and I just haven't found the option? -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 13:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Should've read the source before posting that. Sorry. [[Special:Contributions/62.63.90.44\|62.63.90.44]] 17:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 20 December 2015
Line 15:		Line 15:

	::I find it easier to ID them by spellcasting failure rates, rubbing a touchstone, or elimination after price ID. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 17:28, 20 March 2011 (UTC)		::I find it easier to ID them by spellcasting failure rates, rubbing a touchstone, or elimination after price ID. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 17:28, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	==3.6.0 and weight==
		+	A recent edit adds "NetHack 3.6.0 allows to see weights in the interface". Isn't this only true for wizard mode, or is it possible to view weight outside of that as well and I just haven't found the option? -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 13:55, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 20 March 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:
	--[[User:AileTheAlien\|AileTheAlien]] 15:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)		--[[User:AileTheAlien\|AileTheAlien]] 15:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
	:I don't see anything in the source to specifically check for kicking boots to suppress the Ouch message. I believe that happens as a result of the increased kicking range the boots give; kicking heavy objects at 18/** strength should also suppress the message. I can't say for certain because I can't figure out exactly how the kicking code is working. Kicking an object and having it not hurt could be used to identify the boots, but no more easily than kicking a heavy object and having it move despite being very heavy. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)		:I don't see anything in the source to specifically check for kicking boots to suppress the Ouch message. I believe that happens as a result of the increased kicking range the boots give; kicking heavy objects at 18/** strength should also suppress the message. I can't say for certain because I can't figure out exactly how the kicking code is working. Kicking an object and having it not hurt could be used to identify the boots, but no more easily than kicking a heavy object and having it move despite being very heavy. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	::I find it easier to ID them by spellcasting failure rates, rubbing a touchstone, or elimination after price ID. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 17:28, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 16 March 2011
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Tried verifying with source, but...well it's named nethack for a reason. :\|		Tried verifying with source, but...well it's named nethack for a reason. :\|
	--[[User:AileTheAlien\|AileTheAlien]] 15:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)		--[[User:AileTheAlien\|AileTheAlien]] 15:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
		+	:I don't see anything in the source to specifically check for kicking boots to suppress the Ouch message. I believe that happens as a result of the increased kicking range the boots give; kicking heavy objects at 18/** strength should also suppress the message. I can't say for certain because I can't figure out exactly how the kicking code is working. Kicking an object and having it not hurt could be used to identify the boots, but no more easily than kicking a heavy object and having it move despite being very heavy. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:52, 16 March 2011
Line 4:		Line 4:
	40. dmg += 5;		40. dmg += 5;
	:[[dokick.c#line39]].[[User:Addps4cat\|Addps4cat]] 14:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)		:[[dokick.c#line39]].[[User:Addps4cat\|Addps4cat]] 14:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Identification by Ouch! ==
		+
		+	Seems like when you kick a sufficiently heavy object, eg a statue of a goblin, you get the message ''Thump! Ouch! That hurts!''.
		+	Kicking boots seem to eliminate the damage taken and the message becomes simply ''Thump!''.
		+	Playing latest stable version of SLASH'EM, so might not exist in Vanilla.
		+	Tried verifying with source, but...well it's named nethack for a reason. :\|
		+	--[[User:AileTheAlien\|AileTheAlien]] 15:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 11 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Does anybody know exactly how much kicking boots increase your kicking damage?		Does anybody know exactly how much kicking boots increase your kicking damage?
		+	:I do!
		+	39. if (uarmf && uarmf->otyp == KICKING_BOOTS)
		+	40. dmg += 5;
		+	:[[dokick.c#line39]].[[User:Addps4cat\|Addps4cat]] 14:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)