Talk:NetHack in other languages - Revision history

Umbire the Phantom: /* "Several localization projects for other languages" ... */ reply

2026-05-21T16:34:07Z

"Several localization projects for other languages" ...: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 21 May 2026
Line 17:		Line 17:

	::Too easy, so I guessed there might be an idea I was missing. [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 09:57, 21 May 2026 (UTC)		::Too easy, so I guessed there might be an idea I was missing. [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 09:57, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

			:Sometimes the simplest solution is best! --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 16:34, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Netzhack: /* "Several localization projects for other languages" ... */

2026-05-21T09:57:09Z

"Several localization projects for other languages" ...

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:57, 21 May 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:

	:Yes, an easy enough correction and one that could've been made without worry (though the talk page message is appreciated). --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 22:33, 20 May 2026 (UTC)		:Yes, an easy enough correction and one that could've been made without worry (though the talk page message is appreciated). --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 22:33, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

			::Too easy, so I guessed there might be an idea I was missing. [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 09:57, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Umbire the Phantom: /* "Several localization projects for other languages" ... */ reply

2026-05-20T22:33:33Z

"Several localization projects for other languages" ...: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:33, 20 May 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Localization projects are ''always'' for other languages, are they not? [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 22:30, 20 May 2026 (UTC)		Localization projects are ''always'' for other languages, are they not? [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 22:30, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

			:Yes, an easy enough correction and one that could've been made without worry (though the talk page message is appreciated). --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 22:33, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Netzhack: /* "Several localization projects for other languages" ... */ new section

2026-05-20T22:30:16Z

"Several localization projects for other languages" ...: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 20 May 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:

	::::IMHO someone looking at an article named "NetHack in other languages" will most likely be looking for translations, so a list of projects should probably be first. The section about localization strategies is definitely interesting, though. Perhaps the list of projects should be demoted to subsections in a section about complete and active translations. —[[User:bcode\|bcode]] <sup>[[User talk:bcode\|talk]] \| [[Special:EmailUser/Bcode\|mail]]</sup> 21:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)		::::IMHO someone looking at an article named "NetHack in other languages" will most likely be looking for translations, so a list of projects should probably be first. The section about localization strategies is definitely interesting, though. Perhaps the list of projects should be demoted to subsections in a section about complete and active translations. —[[User:bcode\|bcode]] <sup>[[User talk:bcode\|talk]] \| [[Special:EmailUser/Bcode\|mail]]</sup> 21:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

			== "Several localization projects for other languages" ... ==

			Localization projects are ''always'' for other languages, are they not? [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 22:30, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Bcode: /* Localization Strategy */ Perhaps put all translations into one supersection. I think they should maybe still go first, though.

2013-04-23T21:42:04Z

Localization Strategy: Perhaps put all translations into one supersection. I think they should maybe still go first, though.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 23 April 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:: Okay, we all had a go. Feedback welcome! — [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 23:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)		:: Okay, we all had a go. Feedback welcome! — [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 23:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
	:::I think that "Current NetHack localization strategies" section should be moved to top as general and more interesting than list of projects. Article is very interesting (I know nothing about translating programs and almost nothing about grammar and I like to learn something interesting) [[User:Bulwersator\|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator\|talk]]) 05:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)		:::I think that "Current NetHack localization strategies" section should be moved to top as general and more interesting than list of projects. Article is very interesting (I know nothing about translating programs and almost nothing about grammar and I like to learn something interesting) [[User:Bulwersator\|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator\|talk]]) 05:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

			::::IMHO someone looking at an article named "NetHack in other languages" will most likely be looking for translations, so a list of projects should probably be first. The section about localization strategies is definitely interesting, though. Perhaps the list of projects should be demoted to subsections in a section about complete and active translations. —[[User:bcode\|bcode]] <sup>[[User talk:bcode\|talk]] \| [[Special:EmailUser/Bcode\|mail]]</sup> 21:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Bulwersator: :::I think that "Current NetHack localization strategies" section should be moved to top as general and more interesting than list of projects. Article is very interesting (I know nothing about translating programs and almost nothing about grammar and I l

2013-04-23T05:15:27Z

:::I think that "Current NetHack localization strategies" section should be moved to top as general and more interesting than list of projects. Article is very interesting (I know nothing about translating programs and almost nothing about grammar and I l

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:15, 23 April 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:: Okay, we all had a go. Feedback welcome! — [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 23:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)		:: Okay, we all had a go. Feedback welcome! — [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 23:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
			:::I think that "Current NetHack localization strategies" section should be moved to top as general and more interesting than list of projects. Article is very interesting (I know nothing about translating programs and almost nothing about grammar and I like to learn something interesting) [[User:Bulwersator\|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator\|talk]]) 05:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Netzhack: /* Localization Strategy */

2013-04-22T23:21:01Z

Localization Strategy

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:21, 22 April 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: As a bystander: sounds great. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 20:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC)		: As a bystander: sounds great. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 20:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

			:: Okay, we all had a go. Feedback welcome! — [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 23:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Tjr: great

2013-02-04T20:27:35Z

great

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 4 February 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Hey guys, a section on localization strategy might be nice, and might be useful to someone toying with the idea of translating NetHack into a new language. I know mine (NetzHack's) is different from Patric's (you insert an additional layer of abstraction for output string constants, if I read your code correctly), which I guess is probably different from Ray's, etc. How about if each of us writes a paragraph or two about our approach? — [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 13:38, 4 February 2013 (UTC)		Hey guys, a section on localization strategy might be nice, and might be useful to someone toying with the idea of translating NetHack into a new language. I know mine (NetzHack's) is different from Patric's (you insert an additional layer of abstraction for output string constants, if I read your code correctly), which I guess is probably different from Ray's, etc. How about if each of us writes a paragraph or two about our approach? — [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 13:38, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

			: As a bystander: sounds great. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 20:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Netzhack: Created page with "== Localization Strategy == Hey guys, a section on localization strategy might be nice, and might be useful to someone toying with the idea of translating NetHack into a new ..."

2013-02-04T13:38:53Z

Created page with "== Localization Strategy == Hey guys, a section on localization strategy might be nice, and might be useful to someone toying with the idea of translating NetHack into a new ..."

New page

== Localization Strategy ==

Hey guys, a section on localization strategy might be nice, and might be useful to someone toying with the idea of translating NetHack into a new language. I know mine (NetzHack's) is different from Patric's (you insert an additional layer of abstraction for output string constants, if I read your code correctly), which I guess is probably different from Ray's, etc. How about if each of us writes a paragraph or two about our approach? — [[User:Netzhack|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack|talk]]) 13:38, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 23 April 2013
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:: Okay, we all had a go. Feedback welcome! — [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 23:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)		:: Okay, we all had a go. Feedback welcome! — [[User:Netzhack\|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack\|talk]]) 23:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
	:::I think that "Current NetHack localization strategies" section should be moved to top as general and more interesting than list of projects. Article is very interesting (I know nothing about translating programs and almost nothing about grammar and I like to learn something interesting) [[User:Bulwersator\|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator\|talk]]) 05:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)		:::I think that "Current NetHack localization strategies" section should be moved to top as general and more interesting than list of projects. Article is very interesting (I know nothing about translating programs and almost nothing about grammar and I like to learn something interesting) [[User:Bulwersator\|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator\|talk]]) 05:15, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

			::::IMHO someone looking at an article named "NetHack in other languages" will most likely be looking for translations, so a list of projects should probably be first. The section about localization strategies is definitely interesting, though. Perhaps the list of projects should be demoted to subsections in a section about complete and active translations. —[[User:bcode\|bcode]] <sup>[[User talk:bcode\|talk]] \| [[Special:EmailUser/Bcode\|mail]]</sup> 21:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)