Talk:Rumor messages - Revision history

Djao: /* Juiblex and Orcus */ chaotic summoning

2010-01-12T23:35:15Z

‎Juiblex and Orcus: chaotic summoning

2010-01-12T23:33:10Z

Juiblex and Orcus and bribes

2010-01-11T12:31:51Z

2010-01-05T15:52:25Z

2009-04-28T18:50:38Z

2009-04-28T15:13:53Z

2009-04-28T12:03:31Z

same info as in true rumors?

New page

Isn't this basically the same as [[true rumors]]? --[[User:Paxed|paxed]] 12:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:35, 12 January 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	As chaotic named demons, Juiblex and Orcus are always generated hostile and cannot be made peaceful by any in-game means other than wizard mode. Therefore they will never accept bribes, even though there is no code specifically excluding them from accepting bribes. [[User:Djao\|djao]] 23:33, January 12, 2010 (UTC)		As chaotic named demons, Juiblex and Orcus are always generated hostile and cannot be made peaceful by any in-game means other than wizard mode. Therefore they will never accept bribes, even though there is no code specifically excluding them from accepting bribes. [[User:Djao\|djao]] 23:33, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	: Sorry, I forgot a possibility! Juiblex can be generated peaceful if you summon him as a chaotic by sacrificing your own race. However, in this case, he cannot be generated in his lair, and therefore also will not accept bribes. [[User:Djao\|djao]] 23:35, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:33, 12 January 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	: I actually like your version better (the table-format is good, IMO) --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] 18:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		: I actually like your version better (the table-format is good, IMO) --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] 18:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
	:: I think "Source:True rumors" is quite a misnomer. An ordinary user will not look under Source:. Therefore, I advocate completing this page and then removing the comments from [[True rumors]]. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 15:52, January 5, 2010 (UTC)		:: I think "Source:True rumors" is quite a misnomer. An ordinary user will not look under Source:. Therefore, I advocate completing this page and then removing the comments from [[True rumors]]. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 15:52, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Juiblex and Orcus==
		+
		+	As chaotic named demons, Juiblex and Orcus are always generated hostile and cannot be made peaceful by any in-game means other than wizard mode. Therefore they will never accept bribes, even though there is no code specifically excluding them from accepting bribes. [[User:Djao\|djao]] 23:33, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:52, 5 January 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	[[User:LarryF\|LarryF]] 15:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		[[User:LarryF\|LarryF]] 15:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
	: I actually like your version better (the table-format is good, IMO) --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] 18:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		: I actually like your version better (the table-format is good, IMO) --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] 18:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	:: I think "Source:True rumors" is quite a misnomer. An ordinary user will not look under Source:. Therefore, I advocate completing this page and then removing the comments from [[True rumors]]. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 15:52, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 28 April 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Yep, you're right. I didn't know that [[true rumors]] existed. I didn't see it on the Messages category page. I put together my (incomplete) list a couple of years ago, and never got around to publishing it. I'll mark my page to be deleted, and then see if I have any info that I should put in [[true rumors]]. Shouldn't [[true rumors]] be in the Messages category? -- [[User:LarryF]]		Yep, you're right. I didn't know that [[true rumors]] existed. I didn't see it on the Messages category page. I put together my (incomplete) list a couple of years ago, and never got around to publishing it. I'll mark my page to be deleted, and then see if I have any info that I should put in [[true rumors]]. Shouldn't [[true rumors]] be in the Messages category? -- [[User:LarryF]]
	[[User:LarryF\|LarryF]] 15:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		[[User:LarryF\|LarryF]] 15:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
		+	: I actually like your version better (the table-format is good, IMO) --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] 18:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 28 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Isn't this basically the same as [[true rumors]]? --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] 12:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)		Isn't this basically the same as [[true rumors]]? --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] 12:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	Yep, you're right. I didn't know that [[true rumors]] existed. I didn't see it on the Messages category page. I put together my (incomplete) list a couple of years ago, and never got around to publishing it. I'll mark my page to be deleted, and then see if I have any info that I should put in [[true rumors]]. Shouldn't [[true rumors]] be in the Messages category? -- [[User:LarryF]]
		+	[[User:LarryF\|LarryF]] 15:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:31, 11 January 2010
(No difference)