Talk:Spellbook of enchant weapon - Revision history

Quantum Immortal: rm spam

2015-06-15T10:41:49Z

rm spam

182.88.184.7: /* The Lethal Miscalculation Revealed Around laptop cpu fan and keyboard And Ways To Escape It */ new section

2015-06-15T09:24:27Z

‎The Lethal Miscalculation Revealed Around laptop cpu fan and keyboard And Ways To Escape It: new section

Ion frigate: /* Use by non-spellcasters */

2012-04-25T07:13:26Z

‎Use by non-spellcasters

Ion frigate at 07:11, 25 April 2012

2012-04-25T07:11:29Z

Tjr: s/spellcasing IN slashem/spellcasting (slashem)/

2009-12-28T15:57:32Z

s/spellcasing IN slashem/spellcasting (slashem)/

Newtkiller at 19:44, 18 January 2009

2009-01-18T19:44:10Z

Marcmagus: It's in SLASH'EM?

2008-11-28T18:29:59Z

It's in SLASH'EM?

MisplacedPixels: New page: This item does not exist in Nethack. It may exist in some variant, but not (to my knowledge) in SLASH'EM or SporkHack. Given the power of such an item, it is much more likely an idle fan...

2008-11-28T17:55:13Z

New page: This item does not exist in Nethack. It may exist in some variant, but not (to my knowledge) in SLASH'EM or SporkHack. Given the power of such an item, it is much more likely an idle fan...

New page

This item does not exist in Nethack. It may exist in some variant, but not (to my knowledge) in SLASH'EM or SporkHack. Given the power of such an item, it is much more likely an idle fantasy, and not a very well thought out one at that. Delete? --[[User:MisplacedPixels|MisplacedPixels]] 17:55, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 15 June 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Use by non-spellcasters==		==Use by non-spellcasters==
	Correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt any non-casters would use this spell. I just wizmoded a gnomish caveman, with a robe of power, 19 Int, and a +5 helm of brilliance. At Basic, he still had a failure rate of 79% with this spell, meaning that he's still going to have to cast it, on average, about 47 times before he has about a 2/3 chance of getting one point of enchantment out of it. This equates to 3290 nutrition - four rations' worth - and a necessary total of 1645 power. This gnome has about 250 or so, so he'll have to wait for around 1400 power to recharge in total: that equates to an average of 3500 turns of waiting, assuming he didn't wish for the Eye. Basically I can't see anyone bothering; frankly, I can barely imagine a wizard bothering with this spell. It's a crappy version of a scroll that's pretty easy to write, and it can't even give the blessed effect. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 07:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)		Correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt any non-casters would use this spell. I just wizmoded a gnomish caveman, with a robe of power, 19 Int, and a +5 helm of brilliance. At Basic, he still had a failure rate of 79% with this spell, meaning that he's still going to have to cast it, on average, about 47 times before he has about a 2/3 chance of getting one point of enchantment out of it. This equates to 3290 nutrition - four rations' worth - and a necessary total of 1645 power. This gnome has about 250 or so, so he'll have to wait for around 1400 power to recharge in total: that equates to an average of 3500 turns of waiting, assuming he didn't wish for the Eye. Basically I can't see anyone bothering; frankly, I can barely imagine a wizard bothering with this spell. It's a crappy version of a scroll that's pretty easy to write, and it can't even give the blessed effect. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 07:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
−
−	~~== The Lethal Miscalculation Revealed Around laptop cpu fan and keyboard And Ways To Escape It ==~~
−
−	Terminate Protesting and complaining , Start Off your own special laptop cpu fan[http://www.ampaulz.com/article.php?id=17044] and keyboard Program Preferably Those things all others has been doing concerning laptop cpu fan and keyboard and the actions you will need to complete different. Interesting questions on laptop cpu fan and keyboard[http://hwk1989.blogs.ru/2015/06/15/lg-is-expected-to-become-the-new-apple-watch-exclusive-screen-supplier/] resolved and as a consequence the reasons why you should read each concept on this story.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:24, 15 June 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Use by non-spellcasters==		==Use by non-spellcasters==
	Correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt any non-casters would use this spell. I just wizmoded a gnomish caveman, with a robe of power, 19 Int, and a +5 helm of brilliance. At Basic, he still had a failure rate of 79% with this spell, meaning that he's still going to have to cast it, on average, about 47 times before he has about a 2/3 chance of getting one point of enchantment out of it. This equates to 3290 nutrition - four rations' worth - and a necessary total of 1645 power. This gnome has about 250 or so, so he'll have to wait for around 1400 power to recharge in total: that equates to an average of 3500 turns of waiting, assuming he didn't wish for the Eye. Basically I can't see anyone bothering; frankly, I can barely imagine a wizard bothering with this spell. It's a crappy version of a scroll that's pretty easy to write, and it can't even give the blessed effect. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 07:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)		Correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt any non-casters would use this spell. I just wizmoded a gnomish caveman, with a robe of power, 19 Int, and a +5 helm of brilliance. At Basic, he still had a failure rate of 79% with this spell, meaning that he's still going to have to cast it, on average, about 47 times before he has about a 2/3 chance of getting one point of enchantment out of it. This equates to 3290 nutrition - four rations' worth - and a necessary total of 1645 power. This gnome has about 250 or so, so he'll have to wait for around 1400 power to recharge in total: that equates to an average of 3500 turns of waiting, assuming he didn't wish for the Eye. Basically I can't see anyone bothering; frankly, I can barely imagine a wizard bothering with this spell. It's a crappy version of a scroll that's pretty easy to write, and it can't even give the blessed effect. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 07:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	== The Lethal Miscalculation Revealed Around laptop cpu fan and keyboard And Ways To Escape It ==
		+
		+	Terminate Protesting and complaining , Start Off your own special laptop cpu fan[http://www.ampaulz.com/article.php?id=17044] and keyboard Program Preferably Those things all others has been doing concerning laptop cpu fan and keyboard and the actions you will need to complete different. Interesting questions on laptop cpu fan and keyboard[http://hwk1989.blogs.ru/2015/06/15/lg-is-expected-to-become-the-new-apple-watch-exclusive-screen-supplier/] resolved and as a consequence the reasons why you should read each concept on this story.

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:13, 25 April 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:

	==Use by non-spellcasters==		==Use by non-spellcasters==
−	Correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt any non-casters would use this spell. I just wizmoded a gnomish caveman, with a robe of power, 19 Int, and a +5 helm of brilliance. At Basic, he still had a failure rate of 79% with this spell, meaning that he's still going to have to cast it, on average, about 47 times before he ~~gets even~~ one point of enchantment out of it. This equates to 3290 nutrition - four rations' worth - and a necessary total of 1645 power. This gnome has about 250 or so, so he'll have to wait for around 1400 power to recharge in total: that equates to an average of 3500 turns of waiting, assuming he didn't wish for the Eye. Basically I can't see anyone bothering; frankly, I can barely imagine a wizard bothering with this spell. It's a crappy version of a scroll that's pretty easy to write, and it can't even give the blessed effect. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 07:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)	+	Correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt any non-casters would use this spell. I just wizmoded a gnomish caveman, with a robe of power, 19 Int, and a +5 helm of brilliance. At Basic, he still had a failure rate of 79% with this spell, meaning that he's still going to have to cast it, on average, about 47 times before he has about a 2/3 chance of getting one point of enchantment out of it. This equates to 3290 nutrition - four rations' worth - and a necessary total of 1645 power. This gnome has about 250 or so, so he'll have to wait for around 1400 power to recharge in total: that equates to an average of 3500 turns of waiting, assuming he didn't wish for the Eye. Basically I can't see anyone bothering; frankly, I can barely imagine a wizard bothering with this spell. It's a crappy version of a scroll that's pretty easy to write, and it can't even give the blessed effect. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 07:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:11, 25 April 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::It exist in Slash'em, and also the spellbook of anchant armor. However, by the time you can cast them, you'll probably haave enchated your main weapon to its max state. Also, even if you win other the spell failure, you have only a little chance of succeeding to cast the spell correctly, and to effectively enchant the weapon. And it costs lots of PW.		::It exist in Slash'em, and also the spellbook of anchant armor. However, by the time you can cast them, you'll probably haave enchated your main weapon to its max state. Also, even if you win other the spell failure, you have only a little chance of succeeding to cast the spell correctly, and to effectively enchant the weapon. And it costs lots of PW.
		+
		+	==Use by non-spellcasters==
		+	Correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt any non-casters would use this spell. I just wizmoded a gnomish caveman, with a robe of power, 19 Int, and a +5 helm of brilliance. At Basic, he still had a failure rate of 79% with this spell, meaning that he's still going to have to cast it, on average, about 47 times before he gets even one point of enchantment out of it. This equates to 3290 nutrition - four rations' worth - and a necessary total of 1645 power. This gnome has about 250 or so, so he'll have to wait for around 1400 power to recharge in total: that equates to an average of 3500 turns of waiting, assuming he didn't wish for the Eye. Basically I can't see anyone bothering; frankly, I can barely imagine a wizard bothering with this spell. It's a crappy version of a scroll that's pretty easy to write, and it can't even give the blessed effect. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 07:11, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This item does not exist in Nethack.  It may exist in some variant, but not (to my knowledge) in SLASH'EM or SporkHack.  Given the power of such an item, it is much more likely an idle fantasy, and not a very well thought out one at that.  Delete?  --[[User:MisplacedPixels|MisplacedPixels]] 17:55, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
-: It appears to exist in SLASH'EM, see [[Spellcasting in SLASH'EM]]. Have edited the page to make this clear. -- [[User:Marcmagus|Marcmagus]] 18:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
+: It appears to exist in SLASH'EM, see [[Spellcasting (SLASH'EM)]]. Have edited the page to make this clear. -- [[User:Marcmagus|Marcmagus]] 18:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 ::It exist in Slash'em, and also the spellbook of anchant armor. However, by the time you can cast them, you'll probably haave enchated your main weapon to its max state. Also, even if you win other the spell failure, you have only a little chance of succeeding to cast the spell correctly, and to effectively enchant the weapon. And it costs lots of PW.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 18 January 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: It appears to exist in SLASH'EM, see [[Spellcasting in SLASH'EM]]. Have edited the page to make this clear. -- [[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 18:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)		: It appears to exist in SLASH'EM, see [[Spellcasting in SLASH'EM]]. Have edited the page to make this clear. -- [[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 18:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	::It exist in Slash'em, and also the spellbook of anchant armor. However, by the time you can cast them, you'll probably haave enchated your main weapon to its max state. Also, even if you win other the spell failure, you have only a little chance of succeeding to cast the spell correctly, and to effectively enchant the weapon. And it costs lots of PW.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:29, 28 November 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This item does not exist in Nethack. It may exist in some variant, but not (to my knowledge) in SLASH'EM or SporkHack. Given the power of such an item, it is much more likely an idle fantasy, and not a very well thought out one at that. Delete? --[[User:MisplacedPixels\|MisplacedPixels]] 17:55, 28 November 2008 (UTC)		This item does not exist in Nethack. It may exist in some variant, but not (to my knowledge) in SLASH'EM or SporkHack. Given the power of such an item, it is much more likely an idle fantasy, and not a very well thought out one at that. Delete? --[[User:MisplacedPixels\|MisplacedPixels]] 17:55, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	: It appears to exist in SLASH'EM, see [[Spellcasting in SLASH'EM]]. Have edited the page to make this clear. -- [[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 18:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)