Talk:Voracious hunger - Revision history

Umbire the Phantom: Umbire the Phantom moved page Talk:Hunger (property) to Talk:Voracious hunger: disambig

2025-04-11T08:37:30Z

Umbire the Phantom moved page Talk:Hunger (property) to Talk:Voracious hunger: disambig

Umbire the Phantom at 08:36, 11 April 2025

2025-04-11T08:36:57Z

Michagogo at 17:27, 5 August 2013

2013-08-05T17:27:13Z

Michagogo: Michagogo moved page Talk:Hunger (intrinsic property) to Talk:Hunger (property)

2013-08-05T17:22:26Z

Michagogo moved page Talk:Hunger (intrinsic property) to Talk:Hunger (property)

MysterX: New page: Wouldn't it make more sense to just use '''Hunger (property)''', since intrinsic is more specific and really only applies to those who have (unwisely) eaten a ring of hunger? I know there...

2008-01-25T18:36:08Z

New page: Wouldn't it make more sense to just use '''Hunger (property)''', since intrinsic is more specific and really only applies to those who have (unwisely) eaten a ring of hunger? I know there...

New page

Wouldn't it make more sense to just use '''Hunger (property)''', since intrinsic is more specific and really only applies to those who have (unwisely) eaten a ring of hunger? I know there are many other misuses of the term intrinsic throughout the wiki, but having one in the title of an article seems especially bad form. [[User:MysterX|MysterX]] 18:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:36, 11 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Wouldn't it make more sense to just use '''Hunger (property)''', since intrinsic is more specific and really only applies to those who have (unwisely) eaten a ring of hunger? I know there are many other misuses of the term intrinsic throughout the wiki, but having one in the title of an article seems especially bad form. [[User:MysterX\|MysterX]] 18:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)		Wouldn't it make more sense to just use '''Hunger (property)''', since intrinsic is more specific and really only applies to those who have (unwisely) eaten a ring of hunger? I know there are many other misuses of the term intrinsic throughout the wiki, but having one in the title of an article seems especially bad form. [[User:MysterX\|MysterX]] 18:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
	:Done, 5 and a half years later :-P [[User:Michagogo\|Michagogo]] ([[User talk:Michagogo\|talk]]) 17:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)		:Done, 5 and a half years later :-P [[User:Michagogo\|Michagogo]] ([[User talk:Michagogo\|talk]]) 17:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
		+
		+	Taking an initiative and naming this something more distinct to ease off ambiguity, more than ten years later myself! --[[User:Umbire the Phantom\|Umbire the Phantom]] ([[User talk:Umbire the Phantom\|talk]]) 08:36, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:27, 5 August 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Wouldn't it make more sense to just use '''Hunger (property)''', since intrinsic is more specific and really only applies to those who have (unwisely) eaten a ring of hunger? I know there are many other misuses of the term intrinsic throughout the wiki, but having one in the title of an article seems especially bad form. [[User:MysterX\|MysterX]] 18:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)		Wouldn't it make more sense to just use '''Hunger (property)''', since intrinsic is more specific and really only applies to those who have (unwisely) eaten a ring of hunger? I know there are many other misuses of the term intrinsic throughout the wiki, but having one in the title of an article seems especially bad form. [[User:MysterX\|MysterX]] 18:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
		+	:Done, 5 and a half years later :-P [[User:Michagogo\|Michagogo]] ([[User talk:Michagogo\|talk]]) 17:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:37, 11 April 2025
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:22, 5 August 2013
(No difference)