Talk:Wand - Revision history

Train: /* Effects of exploding cursed wands */ new section

2015-06-05T09:20:38Z

‎Effects of exploding cursed wands: new section

Tjr: unnethack trap creation probability missing

2014-06-05T12:32:18Z

unnethack trap creation probability missing

Bcode: /* Slash'em */ unsigned

2013-08-04T06:34:54Z

‎Slash'em: unsigned

24.22.232.43 at 01:01, 4 August 2013

2013-08-04T01:01:51Z

194.116.198.185: /* new redirect */ request for clarification

2012-09-17T11:32:08Z

‎new redirect: request for clarification

Qazmlpok: /* charging a cancelled wand */

2012-08-16T12:12:18Z

‎charging a cancelled wand

Tjr: /* charging a cancelled wand */ new section

2012-08-16T06:29:51Z

‎charging a cancelled wand: new section

Qazmlpok: /* zapping a wand at yourself */

2011-10-12T13:52:40Z

‎zapping a wand at yourself

194.116.198.179: /* zapping a wand at yourself */

2011-10-12T11:59:37Z

‎zapping a wand at yourself

FJH: /* Zapping the wand of undead turning at yourself... */ Just a comment.

2011-01-07T15:51:21Z

‎Zapping the wand of undead turning at yourself...: Just a comment.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:20, 5 June 2015
Line 59:		Line 59:

	What does "sometimes" mean? Can somebody find out the probability and put it here, please? --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 12:32, 5 June 2014 (UTC)		What does "sometimes" mean? Can somebody find out the probability and put it here, please? --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 12:32, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Effects of exploding cursed wands ==
		+
		+	What exactly happens when a cursed wand explodes? Reading [[zap.c]] -- lines 1839-1842 and section "backfire" -- it appears to abuse strength, destroy the wand and deal a few HP ("d(otmp->spe+2,6)")? Is this true, and in which case, how many? And is this phenomenon completely different from shock-induced explosions?__[[User:Train\|Train]] ([[User talk:Train\|talk]]) 09:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 5 June 2014
Line 54:		Line 54:
	==Slash'em==		==Slash'em==
	The slashem section could use some info on what happens when applying wands. From what I understand their generic magical blast is changed to have a more appropriate effect depending on what type of wand you broke.{{unsigned2\|01:01, 4 August 2013‎\|24.22.232.43}}		The slashem section could use some info on what happens when applying wands. From what I understand their generic magical blast is changed to have a more appropriate effect depending on what type of wand you broke.{{unsigned2\|01:01, 4 August 2013‎\|24.22.232.43}}
		+
		+	==unnethack trap creation==
		+	: in addition to the vanilla effect, sometimes a trap is created
		+
		+	What does "sometimes" mean? Can somebody find out the probability and put it here, please? --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 12:32, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:34, 4 August 2013
Line 53:		Line 53:

	==Slash'em==		==Slash'em==
−	The slashem section could use some info on what happens when applying wands. From what I understand their generic magical blast is changed to have a more appropriate effect depending on what type of wand you broke.	+	The slashem section could use some info on what happens when applying wands. From what I understand their generic magical blast is changed to have a more appropriate effect depending on what type of wand you broke.{{unsigned2\|01:01, 4 August 2013‎\|24.22.232.43}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:01, 4 August 2013
Line 51:		Line 51:

	to be a useful a redirect needs to be mentioned on the destination page. [[You bash yourself!]] redirects to this page and isn't mentioned here. AFAICT it's the message you get if you zap yourself with a wand of striking. whose page doesn't mention it either. is it a SLASH'EM thing? --[[Special:Contributions/194.116.198.185\|194.116.198.185]] 11:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)		to be a useful a redirect needs to be mentioned on the destination page. [[You bash yourself!]] redirects to this page and isn't mentioned here. AFAICT it's the message you get if you zap yourself with a wand of striking. whose page doesn't mention it either. is it a SLASH'EM thing? --[[Special:Contributions/194.116.198.185\|194.116.198.185]] 11:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Slash'em==
		+	The slashem section could use some info on what happens when applying wands. From what I understand their generic magical blast is changed to have a more appropriate effect depending on what type of wand you broke.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:32, 17 September 2012
Line 47:		Line 47:
	Can you recharge a cancelled wand? Does a cursed scroll uncancel it by setting its charges to zero? --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 06:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)		Can you recharge a cancelled wand? Does a cursed scroll uncancel it by setting its charges to zero? --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 06:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
	:As mentioned in [[charging]], yes on both counts. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 12:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)		:As mentioned in [[charging]], yes on both counts. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 12:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	==new redirect==
		+
		+	to be a useful a redirect needs to be mentioned on the destination page. [[You bash yourself!]] redirects to this page and isn't mentioned here. AFAICT it's the message you get if you zap yourself with a wand of striking. whose page doesn't mention it either. is it a SLASH'EM thing? --[[Special:Contributions/194.116.198.185\|194.116.198.185]] 11:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:12, 16 August 2012
Line 46:		Line 46:

	Can you recharge a cancelled wand? Does a cursed scroll uncancel it by setting its charges to zero? --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 06:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)		Can you recharge a cancelled wand? Does a cursed scroll uncancel it by setting its charges to zero? --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 06:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
		+	:As mentioned in [[charging]], yes on both counts. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 12:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:29, 16 August 2012
Line 42:		Line 42:
	*i zapped a wand of death at myself (short, dull, embarrassing story) while i was reflecting, magic protected and MC3. if a monster had done this i would have been fine. instead i got DYWYPI? is this always a certainty? --[[Special:Contributions/194.116.198.179\|194.116.198.179]] 11:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)		*i zapped a wand of death at myself (short, dull, embarrassing story) while i was reflecting, magic protected and MC3. if a monster had done this i would have been fine. instead i got DYWYPI? is this always a certainty? --[[Special:Contributions/194.116.198.179\|194.116.198.179]] 11:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
	:Yes, see [[Wand of death]]. The spell does the same. Zapping yourself with a wand always ignores reflection, but for whatever reason the wand of death also ignores MR. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 13:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)		:Yes, see [[Wand of death]]. The spell does the same. Zapping yourself with a wand always ignores reflection, but for whatever reason the wand of death also ignores MR. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 13:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== charging a cancelled wand ==
		+
		+	Can you recharge a cancelled wand? Does a cursed scroll uncancel it by setting its charges to zero? --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr\|talk]]) 06:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 12 October 2011
Line 41:		Line 41:
	==zapping a wand at yourself==		==zapping a wand at yourself==
	*i zapped a wand of death at myself (short, dull, embarrassing story) while i was reflecting, magic protected and MC3. if a monster had done this i would have been fine. instead i got DYWYPI? is this always a certainty? --[[Special:Contributions/194.116.198.179\|194.116.198.179]] 11:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)		*i zapped a wand of death at myself (short, dull, embarrassing story) while i was reflecting, magic protected and MC3. if a monster had done this i would have been fine. instead i got DYWYPI? is this always a certainty? --[[Special:Contributions/194.116.198.179\|194.116.198.179]] 11:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
		+	:Yes, see [[Wand of death]]. The spell does the same. Zapping yourself with a wand always ignores reflection, but for whatever reason the wand of death also ignores MR. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 13:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 12 October 2011
Line 38:		Line 38:
	: You're perfectly fine (except a few points of damage if you were [[polyself]]ed into an [[undead]] creature). Corpses in your inventory (think [[lizard]]) do [[revive]] from zapping, and the wand is [[identified]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 19:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)		: You're perfectly fine (except a few points of damage if you were [[polyself]]ed into an [[undead]] creature). Corpses in your inventory (think [[lizard]]) do [[revive]] from zapping, and the wand is [[identified]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 19:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
	: A long time ago I had thought "turn undead" would work like this too. --[[User:FJH\|FJH]] 15:51, 7 January 2011 (UTC)		: A long time ago I had thought "turn undead" would work like this too. --[[User:FJH\|FJH]] 15:51, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	==zapping a wand at yourself==
		+	*i zapped a wand of death at myself (short, dull, embarrassing story) while i was reflecting, magic protected and MC3. if a monster had done this i would have been fine. instead i got DYWYPI? is this always a certainty? --[[Special:Contributions/194.116.198.179\|194.116.198.179]] 11:59, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 7 January 2011
Line 37:		Line 37:
	I zapped a wand of undead turning at myself, so does that mean I'm undead now?~♥DemonSlayerThe3rd 18:41, December 8, 2010 (UTC)		I zapped a wand of undead turning at myself, so does that mean I'm undead now?~♥DemonSlayerThe3rd 18:41, December 8, 2010 (UTC)
	: You're perfectly fine (except a few points of damage if you were [[polyself]]ed into an [[undead]] creature). Corpses in your inventory (think [[lizard]]) do [[revive]] from zapping, and the wand is [[identified]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 19:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)		: You're perfectly fine (except a few points of damage if you were [[polyself]]ed into an [[undead]] creature). Corpses in your inventory (think [[lizard]]) do [[revive]] from zapping, and the wand is [[identified]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 19:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
		+	: A long time ago I had thought "turn undead" would work like this too. --[[User:FJH\|FJH]] 15:51, 7 January 2011 (UTC)