User talk:Fredil Yupigo - Revision history

Tjr: /* Please don't edit people's user pages unless invited. */

2010-01-05T14:32:32Z

Please don't edit people's user pages unless invited.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 5 January 2010
Line 33:		Line 33:

	:I've moved the enlightenment table to [[Talk:Enlightenment]] so that everyone can collaborate on it. It's not that I don't appreciate you contributing to the effort, it was just a shock to see you editing a page in my user space, which I believe is considered "mine" within reasonable limits, here or on Wikipedia. If you want to contribute to something else I'm working on there, please let me know first. Cheers. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 11:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		:I've moved the enlightenment table to [[Talk:Enlightenment]] so that everyone can collaborate on it. It's not that I don't appreciate you contributing to the effort, it was just a shock to see you editing a page in my user space, which I believe is considered "mine" within reasonable limits, here or on Wikipedia. If you want to contribute to something else I'm working on there, please let me know first. Cheers. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 11:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

			:: I would like to merge-move [[User:Fredil_Yupigo/Enlightenment]] on top of [[enlightenment]], and am going to do so if nobody objects until including Thursday. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 14:32, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

	== Blessed corpses (Re: BUC) ==		== Blessed corpses (Re: BUC) ==

	No, really, blessed corpses can be rotten. I spent a lot of time last night confirming both by checking the source and wiz-mode testing. If you don't believe me, start a game in wizard mode. Wish up 99 blessed wraith corpses. Eat them all. The chances are excellent that you'll get a "Blecch! Rotten food! . . . The corpse rots away completely." message (you won't see the corpse rot away if you pass out, but it will disappear). [[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 16:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)		No, really, blessed corpses can be rotten. I spent a lot of time last night confirming both by checking the source and wiz-mode testing. If you don't believe me, start a game in wizard mode. Wish up 99 blessed wraith corpses. Eat them all. The chances are excellent that you'll get a "Blecch! Rotten food! . . . The corpse rots away completely." message (you won't see the corpse rot away if you pass out, but it will disappear). [[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 16:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Thomag: /* Enlightenment table edit */

2009-07-15T17:04:01Z

Enlightenment table edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 15 July 2009
Line 37:		Line 37:

	No, really, blessed corpses can be rotten. I spent a lot of time last night confirming both by checking the source and wiz-mode testing. If you don't believe me, start a game in wizard mode. Wish up 99 blessed wraith corpses. Eat them all. The chances are excellent that you'll get a "Blecch! Rotten food! . . . The corpse rots away completely." message (you won't see the corpse rot away if you pass out, but it will disappear). [[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 16:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)		No, really, blessed corpses can be rotten. I spent a lot of time last night confirming both by checking the source and wiz-mode testing. If you don't believe me, start a game in wizard mode. Wish up 99 blessed wraith corpses. Eat them all. The chances are excellent that you'll get a "Blecch! Rotten food! . . . The corpse rots away completely." message (you won't see the corpse rot away if you pass out, but it will disappear). [[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 16:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

	~~== Enlightenment table edit ==~~

	So I folded all the resistances in [[User:Fredil_Yupigo/Enlightenment \| the enlightenment table]] into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean). It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition. If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read.
	~~[[User:Thomag\|Thomag]] 16:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)~~

Thomag: /* Enlightenment table edit */

2009-07-15T16:59:43Z

Enlightenment table edit

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:59, 15 July 2009
Line 40:		Line 40:
	== Enlightenment table edit ==		== Enlightenment table edit ==

	So I folded all the resistances in the enlightenment table into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean). It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition. If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read.		So I folded all the resistances in [[User:Fredil_Yupigo/Enlightenment \| the enlightenment table]] into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean). It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition. If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read.
	[[User:Thomag\|Thomag]] 16:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)		[[User:Thomag\|Thomag]] 16:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Thomag: /* Enlightenment table edit */ new section

2009-07-15T16:57:44Z

Enlightenment table edit: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 15 July 2009
Line 37:		Line 37:

	No, really, blessed corpses can be rotten. I spent a lot of time last night confirming both by checking the source and wiz-mode testing. If you don't believe me, start a game in wizard mode. Wish up 99 blessed wraith corpses. Eat them all. The chances are excellent that you'll get a "Blecch! Rotten food! . . . The corpse rots away completely." message (you won't see the corpse rot away if you pass out, but it will disappear). [[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 16:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)		No, really, blessed corpses can be rotten. I spent a lot of time last night confirming both by checking the source and wiz-mode testing. If you don't believe me, start a game in wizard mode. Wish up 99 blessed wraith corpses. Eat them all. The chances are excellent that you'll get a "Blecch! Rotten food! . . . The corpse rots away completely." message (you won't see the corpse rot away if you pass out, but it will disappear). [[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 16:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

			== Enlightenment table edit ==

			So I folded all the resistances in the enlightenment table into the same "attribute" (it's hard for me to explain clearly; compare my edit to the previous and it will be obvious what I mean). It occurred to me later that maybe that's not what you intended the "attribute" field to be used for, since each resistance is an on/off proposition. If you're not digging what I did I won't be offended if you revert it, but I think it does make the table a bit easier to read.
			[[User:Thomag\|Thomag]] 16:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Marcmagus: /* Blessed corpses (Re: BUC) */ new section

2008-10-10T16:51:28Z

Blessed corpses (Re: BUC): new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 10 October 2008
Line 33:		Line 33:

	:I've moved the enlightenment table to [[Talk:Enlightenment]] so that everyone can collaborate on it. It's not that I don't appreciate you contributing to the effort, it was just a shock to see you editing a page in my user space, which I believe is considered "mine" within reasonable limits, here or on Wikipedia. If you want to contribute to something else I'm working on there, please let me know first. Cheers. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 11:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		:I've moved the enlightenment table to [[Talk:Enlightenment]] so that everyone can collaborate on it. It's not that I don't appreciate you contributing to the effort, it was just a shock to see you editing a page in my user space, which I believe is considered "mine" within reasonable limits, here or on Wikipedia. If you want to contribute to something else I'm working on there, please let me know first. Cheers. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 11:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

			== Blessed corpses (Re: BUC) ==

			No, really, blessed corpses can be rotten. I spent a lot of time last night confirming both by checking the source and wiz-mode testing. If you don't believe me, start a game in wizard mode. Wish up 99 blessed wraith corpses. Eat them all. The chances are excellent that you'll get a "Blecch! Rotten food! . . . The corpse rots away completely." message (you won't see the corpse rot away if you pass out, but it will disappear). [[User:Marcmagus\|Marcmagus]] 16:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Rogerb-on-NAO: /* Please don't edit people's user pages unless invited. */ I've moved the enlightenment table to Talk:Enlightenment

2008-07-17T11:18:35Z

Please don't edit people's user pages unless invited.: I've moved the enlightenment table to Talk:Enlightenment

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:18, 17 July 2008
Line 31:		Line 31:

	It's really rather rude. Thanks. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 02:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		It's really rather rude. Thanks. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 02:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

			:I've moved the enlightenment table to [[Talk:Enlightenment]] so that everyone can collaborate on it. It's not that I don't appreciate you contributing to the effort, it was just a shock to see you editing a page in my user space, which I believe is considered "mine" within reasonable limits, here or on Wikipedia. If you want to contribute to something else I'm working on there, please let me know first. Cheers. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 11:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Rogerb-on-NAO: /* Please don't edit people's user pages unless invited. */ new section

2008-07-17T02:16:52Z

Please don't edit people's user pages unless invited.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:16, 17 July 2008
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:::I've taken a little look into this myself: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Stubs#Categorizing_stubs]]; ''By convention this is placed at the end of the article … so that the stub category will appear last.'' but also higher up: ''A stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text…'', so I think the real difference here is that the "stubs" here are longer. It suggests replacing a stub template with an "expand" template if the article gets long. This seems too complicated for wikihack. I think I'll just carry on as now. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 01:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)		:::I've taken a little look into this myself: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Stubs#Categorizing_stubs]]; ''By convention this is placed at the end of the article … so that the stub category will appear last.'' but also higher up: ''A stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text…'', so I think the real difference here is that the "stubs" here are longer. It suggests replacing a stub template with an "expand" template if the article gets long. This seems too complicated for wikihack. I think I'll just carry on as now. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 01:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::: Okay, it's cool, no problem :) Have a nice day (or night over here) :) [[User:Fredil Yupigo\|Fredil Yupigo]] 03:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)		:::: Okay, it's cool, no problem :) Have a nice day (or night over here) :) [[User:Fredil Yupigo\|Fredil Yupigo]] 03:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

			== Please don't edit people's user pages unless invited. ==

			It's really rather rude. Thanks. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 02:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Fredil Yupigo: /* stub tag usually goes at the end :) */ :)

2008-07-16T03:04:56Z

stub tag usually goes at the end :): :)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:04, 16 July 2008
Line 26:		Line 26:

	:::I've taken a little look into this myself: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Stubs#Categorizing_stubs]]; ''By convention this is placed at the end of the article … so that the stub category will appear last.'' but also higher up: ''A stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text…'', so I think the real difference here is that the "stubs" here are longer. It suggests replacing a stub template with an "expand" template if the article gets long. This seems too complicated for wikihack. I think I'll just carry on as now. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 01:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)		:::I've taken a little look into this myself: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Stubs#Categorizing_stubs]]; ''By convention this is placed at the end of the article … so that the stub category will appear last.'' but also higher up: ''A stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text…'', so I think the real difference here is that the "stubs" here are longer. It suggests replacing a stub template with an "expand" template if the article gets long. This seems too complicated for wikihack. I think I'll just carry on as now. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 01:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
			:::: Okay, it's cool, no problem :) Have a nice day (or night over here) :) [[User:Fredil Yupigo\|Fredil Yupigo]] 03:04, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Rogerb-on-NAO: /* stub tag usually goes at the end :) */ I've taken a little look into this myself.

2008-07-16T01:17:31Z

stub tag usually goes at the end :): I've taken a little look into this myself.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:17, 16 July 2008
Line 24:		Line 24:

	::OK no problem. If you know ''why'' wikipedia puts it at the bottom (just a link would do), I stand ready to be convinced. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 00:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)		::OK no problem. If you know ''why'' wikipedia puts it at the bottom (just a link would do), I stand ready to be convinced. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 00:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

			:::I've taken a little look into this myself: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Stubs#Categorizing_stubs]]; ''By convention this is placed at the end of the article … so that the stub category will appear last.'' but also higher up: ''A stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text…'', so I think the real difference here is that the "stubs" here are longer. It suggests replacing a stub template with an "expand" template if the article gets long. This seems too complicated for wikihack. I think I'll just carry on as now. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 01:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Rogerb-on-NAO: /* stub tag usually goes at the end :) */ OK no problem. If you know why wikipedia puts it at the bottom (just a link would do), I stand ready to be convinced.

2008-07-16T00:14:18Z

stub tag usually goes at the end :): OK no problem. If you know why wikipedia puts it at the bottom (just a link would do), I stand ready to be convinced.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:14, 16 July 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:
	--[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 21:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)		--[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 21:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
	:Ehh... I'm more used to Wikipedia than here, and my only rationale is that it goes at the end on Wikipedia. If you feel like putting it at the top, go ahead :) [[User:Fredil Yupigo\|Fredil Yupigo]] 22:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)		:Ehh... I'm more used to Wikipedia than here, and my only rationale is that it goes at the end on Wikipedia. If you feel like putting it at the top, go ahead :) [[User:Fredil Yupigo\|Fredil Yupigo]] 22:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

			::OK no problem. If you know ''why'' wikipedia puts it at the bottom (just a link would do), I stand ready to be convinced. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 00:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:14, 16 July 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:
	--[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 21:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)		--[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 21:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
	:Ehh... I'm more used to Wikipedia than here, and my only rationale is that it goes at the end on Wikipedia. If you feel like putting it at the top, go ahead :) [[User:Fredil Yupigo\|Fredil Yupigo]] 22:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)		:Ehh... I'm more used to Wikipedia than here, and my only rationale is that it goes at the end on Wikipedia. If you feel like putting it at the top, go ahead :) [[User:Fredil Yupigo\|Fredil Yupigo]] 22:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

			::OK no problem. If you know ''why'' wikipedia puts it at the bottom (just a link would do), I stand ready to be convinced. --[[User:Rogerb-on-NAO\|Rogerb-on-NAO]] 00:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)