User talk:Qazmlpok - Revision history

Qazmlpok: /* Improved nhtohtml */

2018-11-21T02:37:33Z

‎Improved nhtohtml

Paxed: /* Improved nhtohtml */ new section

2018-11-20T05:14:11Z

‎Improved nhtohtml: new section

Qazmlpok: /* Nomination */

2011-10-03T23:22:00Z

‎Nomination

Tjr: /* Nomination */ new section

2011-10-03T21:35:05Z

‎Nomination: new section

Qazmlpok: /* pacifist pits */

2011-09-18T12:48:09Z

‎pacifist pits

Tjr: /* pacifist pits */ new section

2011-09-18T09:32:40Z

‎pacifist pits: new section

Tjr at 01:58, 25 August 2011

2011-08-25T01:58:08Z

Qazmlpok: /* bug list */

2011-08-25T01:54:57Z

‎bug list

Tjr at 01:18, 25 August 2011

2011-08-25T01:18:36Z

Slarty: /* floating eye */ new section

2011-06-29T06:44:47Z

‎floating eye: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:37, 21 November 2018
Line 85:		Line 85:

	Maybe nhtohtml should be on github or similar, so it would be easier to keep track of the changes? --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 05:14, 20 November 2018 (UTC)		Maybe nhtohtml should be on github or similar, so it would be easier to keep track of the changes? --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 05:14, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
		+	:Probably a good idea. I created a repo, https://github.com/qazmlpok/nhtowikihtml . I don't know how many updates I could add, though. I plan on taking a look at some variants over the weekend to try and make it support more stuff.
		+	:I don't do stuff on git much, but I think I have all the files available. I should've created it as public. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok\|talk]]) 02:37, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:14, 20 November 2018
Line 81:		Line 81:
	Hi, would you like to become an admin? Discussion here: [[Forum:New_admins]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 21:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)		Hi, would you like to become an admin? Discussion here: [[Forum:New_admins]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 21:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
	:I'll pass. Adminship isn't really for me. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 23:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)		:I'll pass. Adminship isn't really for me. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 23:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Improved nhtohtml ==
		+
		+	Maybe nhtohtml should be on github or similar, so it would be easier to keep track of the changes? --[[User:Paxed\|paxed]] ([[User talk:Paxed\|talk]]) 05:14, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:22, 3 October 2011
Line 80:		Line 80:

	Hi, would you like to become an admin? Discussion here: [[Forum:New_admins]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 21:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)		Hi, would you like to become an admin? Discussion here: [[Forum:New_admins]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 21:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
		+	:I'll pass. Adminship isn't really for me. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 23:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:35, 3 October 2011
Line 76:		Line 76:
	Hi, you [http://nethackwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Pacifist&diff=next&oldid=49814 changed the list of pacifist conduct breakers] to include monsters falling into your pits on the turn those are created. Are there any other ways to achieve that, except break a wand of digging or apply a drum of earthquake? Could you please clarify that in the article? -- [[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 09:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)		Hi, you [http://nethackwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Pacifist&diff=next&oldid=49814 changed the list of pacifist conduct breakers] to include monsters falling into your pits on the turn those are created. Are there any other ways to achieve that, except break a wand of digging or apply a drum of earthquake? Could you please clarify that in the article? -- [[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 09:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
	:I didn't add that, I only reworded it. You added the two sources of pits [http://nethackwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Pacifist&diff=44879&oldid=44845 here]. But no, I don't know of any other ways to open a pit remotely. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 12:48, 18 September 2011 (UTC)		:I didn't add that, I only reworded it. You added the two sources of pits [http://nethackwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Pacifist&diff=44879&oldid=44845 here]. But no, I don't know of any other ways to open a pit remotely. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 12:48, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Nomination ==
		+
		+	Hi, would you like to become an admin? Discussion here: [[Forum:New_admins]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 21:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 18 September 2011
Line 75:		Line 75:

	Hi, you [http://nethackwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Pacifist&diff=next&oldid=49814 changed the list of pacifist conduct breakers] to include monsters falling into your pits on the turn those are created. Are there any other ways to achieve that, except break a wand of digging or apply a drum of earthquake? Could you please clarify that in the article? -- [[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 09:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)		Hi, you [http://nethackwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Pacifist&diff=next&oldid=49814 changed the list of pacifist conduct breakers] to include monsters falling into your pits on the turn those are created. Are there any other ways to achieve that, except break a wand of digging or apply a drum of earthquake? Could you please clarify that in the article? -- [[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 09:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
		+	:I didn't add that, I only reworded it. You added the two sources of pits [http://nethackwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Pacifist&diff=44879&oldid=44845 here]. But no, I don't know of any other ways to open a pit remotely. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 12:48, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:32, 18 September 2011
Line 71:		Line 71:
	:Yeah, I did. I reported both that bug and being able to use the candellabrum as if you were on the vibrating square after performing the invocation (the other items had the normal effect after doing the invocation). I imagine that they check the wiki at least occasionally anyways. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 01:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)		:Yeah, I did. I reported both that bug and being able to use the candellabrum as if you were on the vibrating square after performing the invocation (the other items had the normal effect after doing the invocation). I imagine that they check the wiki at least occasionally anyways. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 01:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
	::That would have been the first hint they read it. There's been no reaction to [[Bugs_in_NetHack_3.4.3#Bugs_not_mentioned_on_the_DevTeam.27s_website]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 01:58, 25 August 2011 (UTC)		::That would have been the first hint they read it. There's been no reaction to [[Bugs_in_NetHack_3.4.3#Bugs_not_mentioned_on_the_DevTeam.27s_website]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 01:58, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== pacifist pits ==
		+
		+	Hi, you [http://nethackwiki.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Pacifist&diff=next&oldid=49814 changed the list of pacifist conduct breakers] to include monsters falling into your pits on the turn those are created. Are there any other ways to achieve that, except break a wand of digging or apply a drum of earthquake? Could you please clarify that in the article? -- [[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 09:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:58, 25 August 2011
Line 70:		Line 70:
	Did you report the candelabrum bug to the devteam? If not, it means they are reading the wiki .... --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 01:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)		Did you report the candelabrum bug to the devteam? If not, it means they are reading the wiki .... --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 01:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
	:Yeah, I did. I reported both that bug and being able to use the candellabrum as if you were on the vibrating square after performing the invocation (the other items had the normal effect after doing the invocation). I imagine that they check the wiki at least occasionally anyways. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 01:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)		:Yeah, I did. I reported both that bug and being able to use the candellabrum as if you were on the vibrating square after performing the invocation (the other items had the normal effect after doing the invocation). I imagine that they check the wiki at least occasionally anyways. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 01:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
		+	::That would have been the first hint they read it. There's been no reaction to [[Bugs_in_NetHack_3.4.3#Bugs_not_mentioned_on_the_DevTeam.27s_website]]. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 01:58, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:54, 25 August 2011
Line 69:		Line 69:
	==bug list==		==bug list==
	Did you report the candelabrum bug to the devteam? If not, it means they are reading the wiki .... --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 01:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)		Did you report the candelabrum bug to the devteam? If not, it means they are reading the wiki .... --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 01:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
		+	:Yeah, I did. I reported both that bug and being able to use the candellabrum as if you were on the vibrating square after performing the invocation (the other items had the normal effect after doing the invocation). I imagine that they check the wiki at least occasionally anyways. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 01:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:18, 25 August 2011
Line 66:		Line 66:

	Interesting: When I went to see what had happened to my edit, just now, having forgotten where I put whatever it was (luckilly I noted my edit), the 1st place I looked was strategy. In otherwords, oops, and thanks for fixing it.[[User:Slarty\|My next goal (long held now)is to get past the oracle of delphi level. I may never accomplish doing such, my way, which means truly completing each level to my satisfaction.]] 06:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)		Interesting: When I went to see what had happened to my edit, just now, having forgotten where I put whatever it was (luckilly I noted my edit), the 1st place I looked was strategy. In otherwords, oops, and thanks for fixing it.[[User:Slarty\|My next goal (long held now)is to get past the oracle of delphi level. I may never accomplish doing such, my way, which means truly completing each level to my satisfaction.]] 06:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	==bug list==
		+	Did you report the candelabrum bug to the devteam? If not, it means they are reading the wiki .... --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 01:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:44, 29 June 2011
Line 62:		Line 62:
	Hi, Qazmlpok. I undid your edit to [[roshi]], since as far as I can tell, it's incorrect: there are no roshi, hostile or otherwise, on the [[samurai quest]] locate level. Did you perhaps confuse them with the hostile samurai [[player monster]]s which do appear there, and which are identified in the game by their role titles? --[[User:Ilmari Karonen\|Ilmari Karonen]] 15:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)		Hi, Qazmlpok. I undid your edit to [[roshi]], since as far as I can tell, it's incorrect: there are no roshi, hostile or otherwise, on the [[samurai quest]] locate level. Did you perhaps confuse them with the hostile samurai [[player monster]]s which do appear there, and which are identified in the game by their role titles? --[[User:Ilmari Karonen\|Ilmari Karonen]] 15:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
	:Yeah, I must've. Revisiting it in wizard mode certainly isn't showing any hostile guardians. I guess I misread "ronin" as "roshi" and got confused. Thanks for checking it. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)		:Yeah, I must've. Revisiting it in wizard mode certainly isn't showing any hostile guardians. I guess I misread "ronin" as "roshi" and got confused. Thanks for checking it. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	== floating eye ==
		+
		+	Interesting: When I went to see what had happened to my edit, just now, having forgotten where I put whatever it was (luckilly I noted my edit), the 1st place I looked was strategy. In otherwords, oops, and thanks for fixing it.[[User:Slarty\|My next goal (long held now)is to get past the oracle of delphi level. I may never accomplish doing such, my way, which means truly completing each level to my satisfaction.]] 06:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)