User talk:SGrunt - Revision history

Erica: two bugs

2012-04-18T04:22:58Z

two bugs

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:22, 18 April 2012
Line 25:		Line 25:
	I am looking at all the work you have been doing on the bug list, and I was wondering: do you think bug C343-70 could simply be a reference to this: [[exper.c#line76]] (i.e., it could be fixed just by changing tmp to tmp2)? --[[User:Erica\|Erica]] 03:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)		I am looking at all the work you have been doing on the bug list, and I was wondering: do you think bug C343-70 could simply be a reference to this: [[exper.c#line76]] (i.e., it could be fixed just by changing tmp to tmp2)? --[[User:Erica\|Erica]] 03:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
	* You are correct, and thanks for the heads-up! --[[User:SGrunt\|SGrunt]] 03:06, 11 April 2012 (UTC)		* You are correct, and thanks for the heads-up! --[[User:SGrunt\|SGrunt]] 03:06, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

			== Bugs C343-122, C343-116 ==
			*C343-122: I applied a stethoscope to an Angel who was not affiliated with a god. The stethoscope told me that the Angel was neutral, instead of lawful. However, killing the hostile Angel gave +12 alignment record, which is consistent with a lawful Angel with alignment +12. It seems like the stethoscope automatically looks for a god's name when displaying an Angel (or aligned priest)'s alignment, even when there is no such god. Maybe that is the bug.
			*C343-116: I got "choked on an a very rich meal on a tombstone". --[[User:Erica\|Erica]] 04:22, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

SGrunt at 03:06, 11 April 2012

2012-04-11T03:06:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:06, 11 April 2012
Line 24:		Line 24:
	Thank you for fixing the [[Monsters (by experience)]] page a few days ago.		Thank you for fixing the [[Monsters (by experience)]] page a few days ago.
	I am looking at all the work you have been doing on the bug list, and I was wondering: do you think bug C343-70 could simply be a reference to this: [[exper.c#line76]] (i.e., it could be fixed just by changing tmp to tmp2)? --[[User:Erica\|Erica]] 03:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)		I am looking at all the work you have been doing on the bug list, and I was wondering: do you think bug C343-70 could simply be a reference to this: [[exper.c#line76]] (i.e., it could be fixed just by changing tmp to tmp2)? --[[User:Erica\|Erica]] 03:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
			* You are correct, and thanks for the heads-up! --[[User:SGrunt\|SGrunt]] 03:06, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Erica: thank you/question

2012-04-11T03:03:11Z

thank you/question

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, 11 April 2012
Line 20:		Line 20:
	* Thanks! I've added in the fix. (Actually, your logic is slightly wrong in the latter case: I added it as "[...] \|\| On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {", implying that for the penalty to not apply the player must be standing on the invocation square and that it not be a staircase (i.e. that the invocation hasn't already been performed); the check is in the opposite sense as the case for the Book and Bell.) --[[User:SGrunt\|SGrunt]] 16:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)		* Thanks! I've added in the fix. (Actually, your logic is slightly wrong in the latter case: I added it as "[...] \|\| On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {", implying that for the penalty to not apply the player must be standing on the invocation square and that it not be a staircase (i.e. that the invocation hasn't already been performed); the check is in the opposite sense as the case for the Book and Bell.) --[[User:SGrunt\|SGrunt]] 16:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
	::Whoops. Too much copy/paste. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 18:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC)		::Whoops. Too much copy/paste. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 18:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

			== Experience, and a related bug ==
			Thank you for fixing the [[Monsters (by experience)]] page a few days ago.
			I am looking at all the work you have been doing on the bug list, and I was wondering: do you think bug C343-70 could simply be a reference to this: [[exper.c#line76]] (i.e., it could be fixed just by changing tmp to tmp2)? --[[User:Erica\|Erica]] 03:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Qazmlpok: /* Vanilla bug tracker */

2012-04-07T18:31:48Z

Vanilla bug tracker

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 7 April 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:
	I can provide a solution to C343-424 since I filed the report originally. {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|899}}, change this to "obj->age = (obj->age+1)/2;". Another issue that was part of the report but not mentioned on the bug tracker is that you can light the candellabrum without penalty on the invocation square after performing the invocation (this is not the case for the other two artifacts). To fix this: {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|897}}, change to "if (!invocation_pos(u.ux, u.uy) && !On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {" -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)		I can provide a solution to C343-424 since I filed the report originally. {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|899}}, change this to "obj->age = (obj->age+1)/2;". Another issue that was part of the report but not mentioned on the bug tracker is that you can light the candellabrum without penalty on the invocation square after performing the invocation (this is not the case for the other two artifacts). To fix this: {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|897}}, change to "if (!invocation_pos(u.ux, u.uy) && !On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {" -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
	* Thanks! I've added in the fix. (Actually, your logic is slightly wrong in the latter case: I added it as "[...] \|\| On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {", implying that for the penalty to not apply the player must be standing on the invocation square and that it not be a staircase (i.e. that the invocation hasn't already been performed); the check is in the opposite sense as the case for the Book and Bell.) --[[User:SGrunt\|SGrunt]] 16:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)		* Thanks! I've added in the fix. (Actually, your logic is slightly wrong in the latter case: I added it as "[...] \|\| On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {", implying that for the penalty to not apply the player must be standing on the invocation square and that it not be a staircase (i.e. that the invocation hasn't already been performed); the check is in the opposite sense as the case for the Book and Bell.) --[[User:SGrunt\|SGrunt]] 16:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
			::Whoops. Too much copy/paste. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 18:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

SGrunt at 16:45, 7 April 2012

2012-04-07T16:45:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 7 April 2012
Line 18:		Line 18:
	== Vanilla bug tracker ==		== Vanilla bug tracker ==
	I can provide a solution to C343-424 since I filed the report originally. {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|899}}, change this to "obj->age = (obj->age+1)/2;". Another issue that was part of the report but not mentioned on the bug tracker is that you can light the candellabrum without penalty on the invocation square after performing the invocation (this is not the case for the other two artifacts). To fix this: {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|897}}, change to "if (!invocation_pos(u.ux, u.uy) && !On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {" -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)		I can provide a solution to C343-424 since I filed the report originally. {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|899}}, change this to "obj->age = (obj->age+1)/2;". Another issue that was part of the report but not mentioned on the bug tracker is that you can light the candellabrum without penalty on the invocation square after performing the invocation (this is not the case for the other two artifacts). To fix this: {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|897}}, change to "if (!invocation_pos(u.ux, u.uy) && !On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {" -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
			* Thanks! I've added in the fix. (Actually, your logic is slightly wrong in the latter case: I added it as "[...] \|\| On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {", implying that for the penalty to not apply the player must be standing on the invocation square and that it not be a staircase (i.e. that the invocation hasn't already been performed); the check is in the opposite sense as the case for the Book and Bell.) --[[User:SGrunt\|SGrunt]] 16:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Qazmlpok at 16:36, 7 April 2012

2012-04-07T16:36:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:36, 7 April 2012
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Congrats to your ascension, and welcome back! --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 03:20, 7 February 2012 (UTC)		Congrats to your ascension, and welcome back! --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 03:20, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

			== Vanilla bug tracker ==
			I can provide a solution to C343-424 since I filed the report originally. {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|899}}, change this to "obj->age = (obj->age+1)/2;". Another issue that was part of the report but not mentioned on the bug tracker is that you can light the candellabrum without penalty on the invocation square after performing the invocation (this is not the case for the other two artifacts). To fix this: {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|897}}, change to "if (!invocation_pos(u.ux, u.uy) && !On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {" -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Tjr: /* welcome back */ new section

2012-02-07T03:20:27Z

welcome back: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:20, 7 February 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:

	With a cursed loadstone (ie heavy) heart I displaced your Cold article, for one matching the Fire article. Your writing is deposited in Cold:Discussion because you gave some useful information; especially about passive attacks. I've notified an administrator (Kernigh) for fairness; so your article may get reinstated.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 15:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)		With a cursed loadstone (ie heavy) heart I displaced your Cold article, for one matching the Fire article. Your writing is deposited in Cold:Discussion because you gave some useful information; especially about passive attacks. I've notified an administrator (Kernigh) for fairness; so your article may get reinstated.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 15:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

			== welcome back ==

			Congrats to your ascension, and welcome back! --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 03:20, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

PeterGFin at 15:26, 16 March 2007

2007-03-16T15:26:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:26, 16 March 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Could you explain to me how you came about the diffuculty and experience calculations? [[User:Lanzaa\|Lanzaa]] 09:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)		Could you explain to me how you came about the diffuculty and experience calculations? [[User:Lanzaa\|Lanzaa]] 09:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)



			With a cursed loadstone (ie heavy) heart I displaced your Cold article, for one matching the Fire article. Your writing is deposited in Cold:Discussion because you gave some useful information; especially about passive attacks. I've notified an administrator (Kernigh) for fairness; so your article may get reinstated.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 15:26, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Lanzaa: Difficulty

2006-12-27T09:04:56Z

Difficulty

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 27 December 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	The redirects at [[demon prince]], [[demon princes]], [[demon lord]] currently point to the ''top'' of [[demon]] because [[w:MediaWiki\|MediaWiki]] has no support for redirects to sections of articles. --[[User:Kernigh\|Kernigh]] 22:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)		The redirects at [[demon prince]], [[demon princes]], [[demon lord]] currently point to the ''top'' of [[demon]] because [[w:MediaWiki\|MediaWiki]] has no support for redirects to sections of articles. --[[User:Kernigh\|Kernigh]] 22:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
	*I realise this; they're there in case people wonder where the redirects are going. -- [[User:SGrunt\|SGrunt]] 22:24, 24 September 2006 (UTC)		*I realise this; they're there in case people wonder where the redirects are going. -- [[User:SGrunt\|SGrunt]] 22:24, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

			== Difficulty ==

			Could you explain to me how you came about the diffuculty and experience calculations? [[User:Lanzaa\|Lanzaa]] 09:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

SGrunt at 22:24, 24 September 2006

2006-09-24T22:24:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 24 September 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The redirects at [[demon prince]], [[demon princes]], [[demon lord]] currently point to the ''top'' of [[demon]] because [[w:MediaWiki\|MediaWiki]] has no support for redirects to sections of articles. --[[User:Kernigh\|Kernigh]] 22:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)		The redirects at [[demon prince]], [[demon princes]], [[demon lord]] currently point to the ''top'' of [[demon]] because [[w:MediaWiki\|MediaWiki]] has no support for redirects to sections of articles. --[[User:Kernigh\|Kernigh]] 22:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
			*I realise this; they're there in case people wonder where the redirects are going. -- [[User:SGrunt\|SGrunt]] 22:24, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 7 April 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:
	I can provide a solution to C343-424 since I filed the report originally. {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|899}}, change this to "obj->age = (obj->age+1)/2;". Another issue that was part of the report but not mentioned on the bug tracker is that you can light the candellabrum without penalty on the invocation square after performing the invocation (this is not the case for the other two artifacts). To fix this: {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|897}}, change to "if (!invocation_pos(u.ux, u.uy) && !On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {" -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)		I can provide a solution to C343-424 since I filed the report originally. {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|899}}, change this to "obj->age = (obj->age+1)/2;". Another issue that was part of the report but not mentioned on the bug tracker is that you can light the candellabrum without penalty on the invocation square after performing the invocation (this is not the case for the other two artifacts). To fix this: {{sourcecode\|apply.c\|897}}, change to "if (!invocation_pos(u.ux, u.uy) && !On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {" -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 16:36, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
	* Thanks! I've added in the fix. (Actually, your logic is slightly wrong in the latter case: I added it as "[...] \|\| On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {", implying that for the penalty to not apply the player must be standing on the invocation square and that it not be a staircase (i.e. that the invocation hasn't already been performed); the check is in the opposite sense as the case for the Book and Bell.) --[[User:SGrunt\|SGrunt]] 16:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)		* Thanks! I've added in the fix. (Actually, your logic is slightly wrong in the latter case: I added it as "[...] \|\| On_stairs(u.ux, u.uy)) {", implying that for the penalty to not apply the player must be standing on the invocation square and that it not be a staircase (i.e. that the invocation hasn't already been performed); the check is in the opposite sense as the case for the Book and Bell.) --[[User:SGrunt\|SGrunt]] 16:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
			::Whoops. Too much copy/paste. -- [[User:Qazmlpok\|Qazmlpok]] 18:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC)