User talk:Shijun - Revision history

Tjr: /* De-admin */ new section

2011-10-01T00:31:37Z

‎De-admin: new section

Tjr: Text replace - "Wikihack" to "NetHackWiki"

2010-11-11T19:00:46Z

Text replace - "Wikihack" to "NetHackWiki"

Tjr at 18:32, 1 March 2010

2010-03-01T18:32:30Z

ZeroOne: /* You are now sysop! */ new section

2009-02-12T22:59:01Z

‎You are now sysop!: new section

PeterGFin at 14:12, 16 March 2007

2007-03-16T14:12:37Z

PeterGFin at 14:11, 16 March 2007

2007-03-16T14:11:39Z

PeterGFin at 14:10, 16 March 2007

2007-03-16T14:10:10Z

PeterGFin at 13:52, 16 March 2007

2007-03-16T13:52:29Z

Shijun: formatted comments

2007-01-01T03:51:25Z

formatted comments

Yidda at 03:30, 1 January 2007

2007-01-01T03:30:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:31, 1 October 2011
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Hi Shijun,		Hi Shijun,
	I've copied the Civ4 code for March, as per [[NetHackWiki_talk:Featured_articles]]. Feel free to change anything. I'm selecting an article this one time only. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 18:32, March 1, 2010 (UTC)		I've copied the Civ4 code for March, as per [[NetHackWiki_talk:Featured_articles]]. Feel free to change anything. I'm selecting an article this one time only. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 18:32, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== De-admin ==
		+
		+	Hi, since you've been absent quite some time, I've removed your admin rights. If you ever want them back, please just say so. You'll get them, no questions asked. --[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 00:31, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 == You are now sysop! ==
-Congratulations! You are now a sysop = [[Wikihack:Administrators|administrator]]. This gives you access to a few extra wiki features to help maintain the wiki. It is one way of thanking you for your contributions to Wikihack. If you need help with something, you could check [[w:Help:Administrators' how-to guide]] or you could ask me. :) &mdash;[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] (<small>[[User talk:ZeroOne|talk]]</small>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<small>[[Special:Emailuser/ZeroOne|@]]</small>) 22:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
+Congratulations! You are now a sysop = [[NetHackWiki:Administrators|administrator]]. This gives you access to a few extra wiki features to help maintain the wiki. It is one way of thanking you for your contributions to NetHackWiki. If you need help with something, you could check [[w:Help:Administrators' how-to guide]] or you could ask me. :) &mdash;[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] (<small>[[User talk:ZeroOne|talk]]</small>&nbsp;/&nbsp;<small>[[Special:Emailuser/ZeroOne|@]]</small>) 22:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 ==Featured article==
 Hi Shijun,
-I've copied the Civ4 code for March, as per [[Wikihack_talk:Featured_articles]]. Feel free to change anything. I'm selecting an article this one time only. -[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 18:32, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
+I've copied the Civ4 code for March, as per [[NetHackWiki_talk:Featured_articles]]. Feel free to change anything. I'm selecting an article this one time only. -[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 18:32, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 1 March 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Congratulations! You are now a sysop = [[Wikihack:Administrators\|administrator]]. This gives you access to a few extra wiki features to help maintain the wiki. It is one way of thanking you for your contributions to Wikihack. If you need help with something, you could check [[w:Help:Administrators' how-to guide]] or you could ask me. :) —[[User:ZeroOne\|ZeroOne]] (<small>[[User talk:ZeroOne\|talk]]</small> / <small>[[Special:Emailuser/ZeroOne\|@]]</small>) 22:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)		Congratulations! You are now a sysop = [[Wikihack:Administrators\|administrator]]. This gives you access to a few extra wiki features to help maintain the wiki. It is one way of thanking you for your contributions to Wikihack. If you need help with something, you could check [[w:Help:Administrators' how-to guide]] or you could ask me. :) —[[User:ZeroOne\|ZeroOne]] (<small>[[User talk:ZeroOne\|talk]]</small> / <small>[[Special:Emailuser/ZeroOne\|@]]</small>) 22:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Featured article==
		+	Hi Shijun,
		+	I've copied the Civ4 code for March, as per [[Wikihack_talk:Featured_articles]]. Feel free to change anything. I'm selecting an article this one time only. -[[User:Tjr\|Tjr]] 18:32, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:59, 12 February 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:

	With a cursed loadstone (ie heavy) heart I displaced your [[Cold]] article, for one matching the [[Fire]] article. Your writing is deposited in Cold:Discussion because you gave some useful information; especially about [[passive attack]]s. I've notified an administrator (Kernigh) for fairness; so your article may get reinstated.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 13:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)		With a cursed loadstone (ie heavy) heart I displaced your [[Cold]] article, for one matching the [[Fire]] article. Your writing is deposited in Cold:Discussion because you gave some useful information; especially about [[passive attack]]s. I've notified an administrator (Kernigh) for fairness; so your article may get reinstated.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 13:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== You are now sysop! ==
		+
		+	Congratulations! You are now a sysop = [[Wikihack:Administrators\|administrator]]. This gives you access to a few extra wiki features to help maintain the wiki. It is one way of thanking you for your contributions to Wikihack. If you need help with something, you could check [[w:Help:Administrators' how-to guide]] or you could ask me. :) —[[User:ZeroOne\|ZeroOne]] (<small>[[User talk:ZeroOne\|talk]]</small> / <small>[[Special:Emailuser/ZeroOne\|@]]</small>) 22:59, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 16 March 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:Oh, and by the way, nice work on the Attributes template, and amassing 384 entries in your first few days of posting :) {{unsigned\|Yidda\|31 December 2006}}		:Oh, and by the way, nice work on the Attributes template, and amassing 384 entries in your first few days of posting :) {{unsigned\|Yidda\|31 December 2006}}

−	With a cursed loadstone (ie heavy) heart I displaced your [[Cold]] article, for one matching the [[Fire]] article. Your writing is deposited in Cold:Discussion because you gave some information; especially about [[passive attack]]s. I've notified an administrator (Kernigh) for fairness; so your article may get reinstated.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 13:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)	+
		+	With a cursed loadstone (ie heavy) heart I displaced your [[Cold]] article, for one matching the [[Fire]] article. Your writing is deposited in Cold:Discussion because you gave some useful information; especially about [[passive attack]]s. I've notified an administrator (Kernigh) for fairness; so your article may get reinstated.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 13:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 16 March 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:Oh, and by the way, nice work on the Attributes template, and amassing 384 entries in your first few days of posting :) {{unsigned\|Yidda\|31 December 2006}}		:Oh, and by the way, nice work on the Attributes template, and amassing 384 entries in your first few days of posting :) {{unsigned\|Yidda\|31 December 2006}}

−	With a cursed loadstone (ie heavy) heart I displaced your [[Cold]] article, for one matching the [[Fire]] article. ~~You~~ writing is deposited in Cold:Discussion because you gave some information; especially about [[passive attack]]s. I've notified an administrator (Kernigh) for fairness; so your article may get reinstated.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 13:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)	+	With a cursed loadstone (ie heavy) heart I displaced your [[Cold]] article, for one matching the [[Fire]] article. Your writing is deposited in Cold:Discussion because you gave some information; especially about [[passive attack]]s. I've notified an administrator (Kernigh) for fairness; so your article may get reinstated.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 13:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 16 March 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:Oh, and by the way, nice work on the Attributes template, and amassing 384 entries in your first few days of posting :) {{unsigned\|Yidda\|31 December 2006}}		:Oh, and by the way, nice work on the Attributes template, and amassing 384 entries in your first few days of posting :) {{unsigned\|Yidda\|31 December 2006}}

−	With a cursed loadstone (ie heavy) heart I displaced your [[Cold]] article, for one matching the [[Fire]] article. You writing is deposited in Cold:Discussion because you gave some information about [[passive attack]]s ~~which could benefit that stub~~. I notified an administrator for fairness; so your article ~~could be~~ reinstated.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 13:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)	+	With a cursed loadstone (ie heavy) heart I displaced your [[Cold]] article, for one matching the [[Fire]] article. You writing is deposited in Cold:Discussion because you gave some information; especially about [[passive attack]]s. I've notified an administrator (Kernigh) for fairness; so your article may get reinstated.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 13:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 16 March 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:Oh, and by the way, nice work on the Attributes template, and amassing 384 entries in your first few days of posting :) {{unsigned\|Yidda\|31 December 2006}}		:Oh, and by the way, nice work on the Attributes template, and amassing 384 entries in your first few days of posting :) {{unsigned\|Yidda\|31 December 2006}}
		+
		+	With a cursed loadstone (ie heavy) heart I displaced your [[Cold]] article, for one matching the [[Fire]] article. You writing is deposited in Cold:Discussion because you gave some information about [[passive attack]]s which could benefit that stub. I notified an administrator for fairness; so your article could be reinstated.--[[User:PeterGFin\|PeterGFin]] 13:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Templates ==
-You seem to pretty good at using Template:Attributes.  I was thinking that the Attacks section could use a template as well.  What do you think? {{unsigned|Yidda|2006-12-31}}
+You seem to pretty good at using Template:Attributes.  I was thinking that the Attacks section could use a template as well.  What do you think? {{unsigned|Yidda|31 December 2006}}
-I suppose what I was thinking was that there are various attacks, such as Engulfing, Breath weapons, melee weapons, bite, claw etc. and that they could benefit as much from a standardized formatting and linkage as the Attributes field.  In retrospect, perhaps there is some way of writing a new/alternate Monster template that would take in the original source code, as opposed to the pseudo-wiki-code.  I agree that having the item drop template do some auto-calculating would be very handy.  Frankly, creating an Item template that uses the original source code is probably a lot less work than the Monster template...
+:I suppose what I was thinking was that there are various attacks, such as Engulfing, Breath weapons, melee weapons, bite, claw etc. and that they could benefit as much from a standardized formatting and linkage as the Attributes field.  In retrospect, perhaps there is some way of writing a new/alternate Monster template that would take in the original source code, as opposed to the pseudo-wiki-code.  I agree that having the item drop template do some auto-calculating would be very handy.  Frankly, creating an Item template that uses the original source code is probably a lot less work than the Monster template...
-I'm not very familiar with the template syntax/capabilities yet, but I'll be playing with it over the next few days.
+:I'm not very familiar with the template syntax/capabilities yet, but I'll be playing with it over the next few days.
-Oh, and by the way, nice work on the Attributes template, and amassing 384 entries in your first few days of posting :)
+:Oh, and by the way, nice work on the Attributes template, and amassing 384 entries in your first few days of posting :) {{unsigned|Yidda|31 December 2006}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:30, 1 January 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	You seem to pretty good at using Template:Attributes. I was thinking that the Attacks section could use a template as well. What do you think? {{unsigned\|Yidda\|2006-12-31}}		You seem to pretty good at using Template:Attributes. I was thinking that the Attacks section could use a template as well. What do you think? {{unsigned\|Yidda\|2006-12-31}}
		+
		+	I suppose what I was thinking was that there are various attacks, such as Engulfing, Breath weapons, melee weapons, bite, claw etc. and that they could benefit as much from a standardized formatting and linkage as the Attributes field. In retrospect, perhaps there is some way of writing a new/alternate Monster template that would take in the original source code, as opposed to the pseudo-wiki-code. I agree that having the item drop template do some auto-calculating would be very handy. Frankly, creating an Item template that uses the original source code is probably a lot less work than the Monster template...
		+
		+	I'm not very familiar with the template syntax/capabilities yet, but I'll be playing with it over the next few days.
		+
		+	Oh, and by the way, nice work on the Attributes template, and amassing 384 entries in your first few days of posting :)