Talk:Deferred features

From NetHackWiki
Revision as of 17:25, 21 January 2016 by Qazmlpok (talk | contribs) (Isn't "x-ray vision" just internal name for astral vision?)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Perhaps obsolete features ought to have their own page? They seem to be a distinct category from deferred features.Ray Chason 05:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

True, but as far as I can tell, there are no other obsolete features still in the code (except a few internal functions). I mentioned them here in the same way I mentioned Disease on the Sickness page, as a not-to-be-confused-with section. --Jayt 09:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Imaginary Widget...

The name's obviously a placeholder, but is there a base item type for it yet? 75.58.124.110 21:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

"There is code that lets monsters use scrolls of fire as a last-resort offense."

Is this code buggy/broken/problematic or is there problem with idea itself? Bulwersator (talk) 11:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

It's compiled out with no comment explaining why. I don't know how the offense code works, so I can't tell if it'd work if the #if 0 was removed or not. Code's at muse.c, line 1082, for reference. -- Qazmlpok (talk) 13:26, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Isn't "x-ray vision" just internal name for astral vision?

217.197.205.109 16:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Looks like it. Eyes is tagged with SPFX_XRAY, which does u.xray_range = 3;. -- Qazmlpok (talk) 16:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)