Difference between revisions of "Forum:+6 DSM?"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(*"Does that increase come with the regular chance of evaporating a set that is already at +5" yes. BTW, it is trivial to test it in Wizard mode ~~~~)
(* -> ")
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
Converting dragon scales into dragon scale mail with a blessed scroll of enchant armor increases the enchantment of the resulting armor by 1. Does that increase come with the regular chance of evaporating a set that is already at +5, or is it a special case that allows you to get a guaranteed +6 suit of armor?
 
Converting dragon scales into dragon scale mail with a blessed scroll of enchant armor increases the enchantment of the resulting armor by 1. Does that increase come with the regular chance of evaporating a set that is already at +5, or is it a special case that allows you to get a guaranteed +6 suit of armor?
 
[[User:Fyr|Fyr]] ([[User talk:Fyr|talk]]) 08:39, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 
[[User:Fyr|Fyr]] ([[User talk:Fyr|talk]]) 08:39, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
*"Does that increase come with the regular chance of evaporating a set that is already at +5" yes. BTW, it is trivial to test it in [[Wizard mode]] [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 11:20, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
+
:"Does that increase come with the regular chance of evaporating a set that is already at +5" yes. BTW, it is trivial to test it in [[Wizard mode]] [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 11:20, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:21, 29 April 2013


Converting dragon scales into dragon scale mail with a blessed scroll of enchant armor increases the enchantment of the resulting armor by 1. Does that increase come with the regular chance of evaporating a set that is already at +5, or is it a special case that allows you to get a guaranteed +6 suit of armor? Fyr (talk) 08:39, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

"Does that increase come with the regular chance of evaporating a set that is already at +5" yes. BTW, it is trivial to test it in Wizard mode Bulwersator (talk) 11:20, 29 April 2013 (UTC)