Difference between revisions of "Forum:New admins"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(future admin policy) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
# Proposed policy: If you're inactive for one solid year, you lose your admin rights. You can get them back again at any time you wish. (I doubt anybody will make use of that option, but it would feel somehow disrespectful not to provide it.) | # Proposed policy: If you're inactive for one solid year, you lose your admin rights. You can get them back again at any time you wish. (I doubt anybody will make use of that option, but it would feel somehow disrespectful not to provide it.) | ||
| − | Please feel free to comment - the more people, the better. No | + | Please feel free to comment - the more people, the better. No voting on admin candidates yet, but nominations are welcome. --[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 00:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:51, 1 October 2011
Many previous admins have become inactive. Let's discuss a few points:
- Do we need more admins?
- If yes: Who wants to? Who should do the job? What should we look for in a good admin? Admins should be chosen in public, by the wiki user base.
- Proposed policy: If you're inactive for one solid year, you lose your admin rights. You can get them back again at any time you wish. (I doubt anybody will make use of that option, but it would feel somehow disrespectful not to provide it.)
Please feel free to comment - the more people, the better. No voting on admin candidates yet, but nominations are welcome. --Tjr 00:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
