Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ascension kit"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I think invisibility makes up for not being displaced) |
(cloaks of displacement) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I prefer a cloak of magic protection or a plain cloak of protection. I don't really desire for cloak of displacement as I usually try to get permanently invisible and I think it is enough. --[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] 22:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | :I prefer a cloak of magic protection or a plain cloak of protection. I don't really desire for cloak of displacement as I usually try to get permanently invisible and I think it is enough. --[[User:ZeroOne|ZeroOne]] 22:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :It's usually a matter of what you can get hold of. If you happen to have only found a cloak of displacement, the table lists your options. However, I believe displacement is underrated. It's a very useful effect, easily making up for it having only MC2, since you are hit less often in the first place (although I'm not sure how the actual probabilities work out). --[[User:Jayt|Jayt]] 22:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:53, 18 July 2006
Is displacement really that desirable in the endgame? I've never tried, so I don't feel qualified to comment on it, but I've never felt lacking for it either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raxvulpine (talk • contribs) 18 July 2006
- I prefer a cloak of magic protection or a plain cloak of protection. I don't really desire for cloak of displacement as I usually try to get permanently invisible and I think it is enough. --ZeroOne 22:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's usually a matter of what you can get hold of. If you happen to have only found a cloak of displacement, the table lists your options. However, I believe displacement is underrated. It's a very useful effect, easily making up for it having only MC2, since you are hit less often in the first place (although I'm not sure how the actual probabilities work out). --Jayt 22:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
