Difference between revisions of "Talk:Beginner's guide to NetHack sources"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "This page is not at all up to date. The Des-file formatting has changed quite a bit since this was written and the necessary Makefile changes aren't included. --~~~~")
 
(Some grammatical errors in there: new section)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This page is not at all up to date. The Des-file formatting has changed quite a bit since this was written and the necessary Makefile changes aren't included. --[[User:Rampion|Rampion]] ([[User talk:Rampion|talk]]) 21:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 
This page is not at all up to date. The Des-file formatting has changed quite a bit since this was written and the necessary Makefile changes aren't included. --[[User:Rampion|Rampion]] ([[User talk:Rampion|talk]]) 21:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 +
 +
: Not sure what version was contemporary at the time, but it says March '95, so it's 22 years old. I think that a warning expressing those concerns should be added to the top of the page. --[[User:Phol ende wodan|Phol ende wodan]] ([[User talk:Phol ende wodan|talk]]) 21:35, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 +
 +
::It won't let me edit the page at all. --[[User:Rampion|Rampion]] ([[User talk:Rampion|talk]]) 21:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 +
:::It's a reproduction of a spoiler, so the content should be left alone. A new page should be created if anything, and an admin would need to link to that new page. -- [[User:Qazmlpok|Qazmlpok]] ([[User talk:Qazmlpok|talk]]) 00:34, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Some grammatical errors in there ==
 +
 +
Such as three instances of intransitive "allows". Hopefully this will be considered obsolete soon and thrown out completely. [[User:Netzhack|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack|talk]]) 16:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:34, 27 May 2020

This page is not at all up to date. The Des-file formatting has changed quite a bit since this was written and the necessary Makefile changes aren't included. --Rampion (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Not sure what version was contemporary at the time, but it says March '95, so it's 22 years old. I think that a warning expressing those concerns should be added to the top of the page. --Phol ende wodan (talk) 21:35, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
It won't let me edit the page at all. --Rampion (talk) 21:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
It's a reproduction of a spoiler, so the content should be left alone. A new page should be created if anything, and an admin would need to link to that new page. -- Qazmlpok (talk) 00:34, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Some grammatical errors in there

Such as three instances of intransitive "allows". Hopefully this will be considered obsolete soon and thrown out completely. Netzhack (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)