Difference between revisions of "Talk:DevTeam"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Well, they do still exist. Their activity, on the other hand, might be open for debate.) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:The DevTeam '''is''' the group of people who develop'''ed''' vanilla NetHack (that's what the article also currently says). That is, they still exist. | :The DevTeam '''is''' the group of people who develop'''ed''' vanilla NetHack (that's what the article also currently says). That is, they still exist. | ||
:The "develop'''ed'''" bit might be debatable. However, even if they're still developing it, they develop''ed'' it ''as we have it now'' at least. —[[User:Bcode|Bcode]] ([[User talk:Bcode|talk]]) 16:12, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | :The "develop'''ed'''" bit might be debatable. However, even if they're still developing it, they develop''ed'' it ''as we have it now'' at least. —[[User:Bcode|Bcode]] ([[User talk:Bcode|talk]]) 16:12, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think that KMH is Kevin Hugo's "signature" in the source code. Can anyone confirm this? (It's in the code; see trap.c line 494 and wield.c line 7.) --[[User:Rampion|Rampion]] ([[User talk:Rampion|talk]]) 01:21, 29 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:21, 29 August 2017
I think that we should use past tense in this article - "The DevTeam was the group of people who developed vanilla NetHack. (...)" Bulwersator (talk) 16:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- The DevTeam is the group of people who developed vanilla NetHack (that's what the article also currently says). That is, they still exist.
- The "developed" bit might be debatable. However, even if they're still developing it, they developed it as we have it now at least. —Bcode (talk) 16:12, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
I think that KMH is Kevin Hugo's "signature" in the source code. Can anyone confirm this? (It's in the code; see trap.c line 494 and wield.c line 7.) --Rampion (talk) 01:21, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
