Difference between revisions of "Talk:Disenchanter"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "I don't get why disenchanters don't lower the enchantment of rings. If you are attacking them hare handed then you'd be attacking them with your ring as well just like if you ...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I don't get why disenchanters don't lower the enchantment of rings. If you are attacking them hare handed then you'd be attacking them with your ring as well just like if you attack undead while wearing a silver ring.  What's the logic to them not making rings less enchanted?[[User:Ndwolfwood|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood|talk]]) 22:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 
I don't get why disenchanters don't lower the enchantment of rings. If you are attacking them hare handed then you'd be attacking them with your ring as well just like if you attack undead while wearing a silver ring.  What's the logic to them not making rings less enchanted?[[User:Ndwolfwood|Ndwolfwood]] ([[User talk:Ndwolfwood|talk]]) 22:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
: Indeed, it's inconsistent. I guess the DevTeam added silver damage as an afterthought, given it's handled inconsistently all by itself. --[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] ([[User talk:Tjr|talk]]) 22:09, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:09, 13 June 2012

I don't get why disenchanters don't lower the enchantment of rings. If you are attacking them hare handed then you'd be attacking them with your ring as well just like if you attack undead while wearing a silver ring. What's the logic to them not making rings less enchanted?Ndwolfwood (talk) 22:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Indeed, it's inconsistent. I guess the DevTeam added silver damage as an afterthought, given it's handled inconsistently all by itself. --Tjr (talk) 22:09, 13 June 2012 (UTC)