Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hunger (property)"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Wouldn't it make more sense to just use '''Hunger (property)''', since intrinsic is more specific and really only applies to those who have (unwisely) eaten a ring of hunger?  I know there are many other misuses of the term intrinsic throughout the wiki, but having one in the title of an article seems especially bad form. [[User:MysterX|MysterX]] 18:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 
Wouldn't it make more sense to just use '''Hunger (property)''', since intrinsic is more specific and really only applies to those who have (unwisely) eaten a ring of hunger?  I know there are many other misuses of the term intrinsic throughout the wiki, but having one in the title of an article seems especially bad form. [[User:MysterX|MysterX]] 18:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 +
:Done, 5 and a half years later :-P [[User:Michagogo|Michagogo]] ([[User talk:Michagogo|talk]]) 17:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:27, 5 August 2013

Wouldn't it make more sense to just use Hunger (property), since intrinsic is more specific and really only applies to those who have (unwisely) eaten a ring of hunger? I know there are many other misuses of the term intrinsic throughout the wiki, but having one in the title of an article seems especially bad form. MysterX 18:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Done, 5 and a half years later :-P Michagogo (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)