Difference between revisions of "Talk:INetHack"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Making a seperate page for iNetHack2: new section) |
(spelling) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Making a seperate page for iNetHack2 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I added a note about [https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/inethack2/id962114968?mt=8 iNetHack2], but do people think it should have it's own page? [http://www.reddit.com/r/nethack/comments/2xc9jz/good_news_everyone_inethack_for_ios_has_been/ Reddit conversation] | ||
| + | [[Special:Contributions/209.151.236.12|209.151.236.12]] 17:43, 27 February 2015 (UTC)Elronnd | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
I don't think it's accurate to call iNetHack a variant. Gameplay is just like vanilla as far as I can tell, except it uses a touchscreen instead of a keyboard. It would be better to call it a port for iOS right? I plan to reword the beginning of the article later, unless someone tells me I'm wrong. Or if you beat me to the edit, that would probably be even better!——[[User:Godska|Godska]] ([[User talk:Godska|talk]]) 12:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC) | I don't think it's accurate to call iNetHack a variant. Gameplay is just like vanilla as far as I can tell, except it uses a touchscreen instead of a keyboard. It would be better to call it a port for iOS right? I plan to reword the beginning of the article later, unless someone tells me I'm wrong. Or if you beat me to the edit, that would probably be even better!——[[User:Godska|Godska]] ([[User talk:Godska|talk]]) 12:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
:That's fine, though it should definitely stay in the Variants category, since that's where people look for all of the different things that can be derived from or called NetHack. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate|talk]]) 08:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC) | :That's fine, though it should definitely stay in the Variants category, since that's where people look for all of the different things that can be derived from or called NetHack. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate|talk]]) 08:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
::having played it, it's customised so heavily to the porter's playstyle that it's definitely a variant and infuriating to use if you're used to vanilla. it's horrible. --[[Special:Contributions/81.159.214.184|81.159.214.184]] 20:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC) | ::having played it, it's customised so heavily to the porter's playstyle that it's definitely a variant and infuriating to use if you're used to vanilla. it's horrible. --[[Special:Contributions/81.159.214.184|81.159.214.184]] 20:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 17:44, 27 February 2015
Making a seperate page for iNetHack2
I added a note about iNetHack2, but do people think it should have it's own page? Reddit conversation 209.151.236.12 17:43, 27 February 2015 (UTC)Elronnd
I don't think it's accurate to call iNetHack a variant. Gameplay is just like vanilla as far as I can tell, except it uses a touchscreen instead of a keyboard. It would be better to call it a port for iOS right? I plan to reword the beginning of the article later, unless someone tells me I'm wrong. Or if you beat me to the edit, that would probably be even better!——Godska (talk) 12:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- That's fine, though it should definitely stay in the Variants category, since that's where people look for all of the different things that can be derived from or called NetHack. -Ion frigate (talk) 08:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- having played it, it's customised so heavily to the porter's playstyle that it's definitely a variant and infuriating to use if you're used to vanilla. it's horrible. --81.159.214.184 20:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
