Difference between revisions of "Talk:Katana"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Skill in off-hand weapon?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Masterwork Weapon Bonus Doubtful== | ==Masterwork Weapon Bonus Doubtful== | ||
| + | The +1 to hit bonus being a nod to D&D because of masterwork weapons is highly doubtful. That bonus started with D&D 3.0, which I doubt was taken into consideration when the Devs added Katana into the game. [[Special:Contributions/71.236.214.36|71.236.214.36]] 05:57, July 1, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | |||
==Skill in off-hand weapon?== | ==Skill in off-hand weapon?== | ||
The current revision contains the edit comment "Removed the sentence about twoweaponing, because skill in the off-hand weapon doesn't matter." However, according to the [[Twoweapon]] article, skill in the off-hand weapon does matter for damage calculations (not for to-hit calculations). I suggest re-introducing the deleted sentence or adding a different, more specific explanation. [[User:Djao|djao]] 08:50, December 16, 2009 (UTC) | The current revision contains the edit comment "Removed the sentence about twoweaponing, because skill in the off-hand weapon doesn't matter." However, according to the [[Twoweapon]] article, skill in the off-hand weapon does matter for damage calculations (not for to-hit calculations). I suggest re-introducing the deleted sentence or adding a different, more specific explanation. [[User:Djao|djao]] 08:50, December 16, 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:57, 1 July 2010
Masterwork Weapon Bonus Doubtful
The +1 to hit bonus being a nod to D&D because of masterwork weapons is highly doubtful. That bonus started with D&D 3.0, which I doubt was taken into consideration when the Devs added Katana into the game. 71.236.214.36 05:57, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
Skill in off-hand weapon?
The current revision contains the edit comment "Removed the sentence about twoweaponing, because skill in the off-hand weapon doesn't matter." However, according to the Twoweapon article, skill in the off-hand weapon does matter for damage calculations (not for to-hit calculations). I suggest re-introducing the deleted sentence or adding a different, more specific explanation. djao 08:50, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
- Done. djao 12:56, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
