Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ki-rin"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (header)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
:This is [[Bugs in NetHack 3.4.3|bug]] C341-18, listed as fixed in a future release.--[[User:Ray Chason|Ray Chason]] 15:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 
:This is [[Bugs in NetHack 3.4.3|bug]] C341-18, listed as fixed in a future release.--[[User:Ray Chason|Ray Chason]] 15:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Tameness ==
 +
 +
I've heard it said that they're "difficult" to keep tame blah blah many times, but how can you? If they don't eat and you're not a knight they'll go feral after you ride them 5 times (assuming you used charm monster)... right? Is there any way other than eating to raise tameness? If not, then we should stop pussyfooting about and say that any non-knight who want to regularly ride one should establish a way of hatching more of them or something, instead of just letting them know that it's not easy to keep an angelic pet. [[User:DemonDoll|DemonDoll]] 19:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:34, 1 June 2009

Gloves

apparently they can wear gloves. . . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 171.159.192.10 (talkcontribs) .

This is bug C341-18, listed as fixed in a future release.--Ray Chason 15:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Tameness

I've heard it said that they're "difficult" to keep tame blah blah many times, but how can you? If they don't eat and you're not a knight they'll go feral after you ride them 5 times (assuming you used charm monster)... right? Is there any way other than eating to raise tameness? If not, then we should stop pussyfooting about and say that any non-knight who want to regularly ride one should establish a way of hatching more of them or something, instead of just letting them know that it's not easy to keep an angelic pet. DemonDoll 19:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)