Difference between revisions of "Talk:Magic harp"
(→agree with LoATS: new section) |
(→agree with LoATS) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I noticed that the page is more about tame nymph than magic harp, I tried to fix some grammar and add some useful info about the behavior of the harp but I'm not really wiki-skilled enough to move the tame nymph stuff to another page. Also the overall tone of the nymph advice is less encylopedia-like than the rest of the wiki. | I noticed that the page is more about tame nymph than magic harp, I tried to fix some grammar and add some useful info about the behavior of the harp but I'm not really wiki-skilled enough to move the tame nymph stuff to another page. Also the overall tone of the nymph advice is less encylopedia-like than the rest of the wiki. | ||
| + | *Well, if you check the [[Nymph]] article, you'll see that I moved the "tame nymph" stuff there, and tried to make it a bit more encyclopedic. --[[User:Kahran042|Kahran042]] 20:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:08, 9 June 2008
for the tamed nymph strategy, if you drop a wand she'll use it (but isn't too concerned about friendly fire)
This page is entitled Magic Harp, not Nymph
I think that this page should not elaborate on the nymph-taming strategy. The page should mention how to identify how to distinguish a wooden harp from a magic harp, and then maybe link to the Nymph page where a part should be added (if it hasn't been already) about the benefits and downfalls of having a pet nymph. But putting it on this page is unnecessary for the this page. LoATS 02:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
agree with LoATS
I noticed that the page is more about tame nymph than magic harp, I tried to fix some grammar and add some useful info about the behavior of the harp but I'm not really wiki-skilled enough to move the tame nymph stuff to another page. Also the overall tone of the nymph advice is less encylopedia-like than the rest of the wiki.
