Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mummy wrapping"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(unsigned messages) |
(→B/U/C: new section) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::But all of the invisible man's clothing was seen, not only his bandages. ;) {{unsigned|77.124.135.186|7 March 2009}} | ::But all of the invisible man's clothing was seen, not only his bandages. ;) {{unsigned|77.124.135.186|7 March 2009}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == B/U/C == | ||
| + | |||
| + | What are the B/U/C probabilities? | ||
Latest revision as of 21:04, 15 September 2010
I've always wondered that...Why the mummy wrapping? Surely any armor would give the same effect logically. Silly shopkeepers. They don't mind a dwarf looting all their stuff and hacking at all their walls, but invisibility is RIGHT OUT, even with pounds of armor on... Lotte 03:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- If you had read the article, you would have seen that it is a reference to the invisible man. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.66.91.156 (talk • contribs) 5 February 2009
- But all of the invisible man's clothing was seen, not only his bandages. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.124.135.186 (talk • contribs) 7 March 2009
B/U/C
What are the B/U/C probabilities?
