Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ray"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (changed.) |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
(Hmm...I'm not sure I drew the reflections right :P) [[User:Gneek|Gneek]] 14:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC) | (Hmm...I'm not sure I drew the reflections right :P) [[User:Gneek|Gneek]] 14:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I changed the article to use the proper ray symbols. --[[User:Paxed|paxed]] 15:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC) | :I changed the article to use the proper ray symbols. --[[User:Paxed|paxed]] 15:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==breath attacks== | ||
| + | Why clutter the article with nine types of dragons, if each one links back to the same page? I'm for merging them all. -[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 04:03, February 20, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:03, 20 February 2010
I love the new "Bouncing rays" section, but perhaps we could change the "~" symbol with "/","\","-" and "|"?
It's just that this:
-----------
|../\.....|
|./..\....+
|/....@...|
|\........|
-----------
Would look a little better than this: (in my humble opinion, of course)
-----------
|..~~.....|
|.~..~....+
|~....@...|
|~........|
-----------
Just a thought, what do you people think?
(Hmm...I'm not sure I drew the reflections right :P) Gneek 14:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- I changed the article to use the proper ray symbols. --paxed 15:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
breath attacks
Why clutter the article with nine types of dragons, if each one links back to the same page? I'm for merging them all. -Tjr 04:03, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
