Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stealing from shops"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (pet stealing: unsigned comment)
(pet stealing)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
== pet stealing ==
 
== pet stealing ==
 
Using your pet to steal from a shop is listed as both indirect and direct.  What is the difference? {{unsigned|199.46.245.231|12 March 2009}}
 
Using your pet to steal from a shop is listed as both indirect and direct.  What is the difference? {{unsigned|199.46.245.231|12 March 2009}}
 +
 +
::Indirect is incorrect. The shop owner won't become angered like the other direct methods mentioned. I will edit the page. --[[User:SaintD|SaintD]] 22:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:15, 13 March 2009

How about monsters with a theft-attack? Nymphs, monkeys, leprechauns. Maybe we should create a disambiguation page? --ZeroOne 17:43, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Agreed, and done. --Jayt 19:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
The 200 rock steal should be considered a cheat, I doubt the creators intended it to be possible. --124.197.54.130 00:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Wands

I killed a shopkeeper with a lvl 1 player by getting him between me, an empty square, and a wall zapping him with a wand of fire do that it bounced. It took 3 hits 1 miss and 2 zaps to kill him.


pet stealing

Using your pet to steal from a shop is listed as both indirect and direct. What is the difference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.46.245.231 (talkcontribs) 12 March 2009

Indirect is incorrect. The shop owner won't become angered like the other direct methods mentioned. I will edit the page. --SaintD 22:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)