Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Eyes of the Overworld"
m (Text replace - "Wikihack" to "NetHackWiki") |
Ndwolfwood (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A few months back, I wrote the Everything2 article on [http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1765212 The Eyes of the Overworld]. To write the article that appears on NetHackWiki, I basically just trimmed out the unprofessional bits of the E2 article (as well as things most NetHackers know, such as that Gehennom is incredibly maze-y). If anyone has a problem with this either way, I'll be happy to rewrite this article or include more from the E2 article. I'm pretty sure that the E2 copyright policy is that the noder (i.e. author) retains full copyright ownership, so it shouldn't be a problem. [[User:Eidolos|Eidolos]] 03:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | A few months back, I wrote the Everything2 article on [http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1765212 The Eyes of the Overworld]. To write the article that appears on NetHackWiki, I basically just trimmed out the unprofessional bits of the E2 article (as well as things most NetHackers know, such as that Gehennom is incredibly maze-y). If anyone has a problem with this either way, I'll be happy to rewrite this article or include more from the E2 article. I'm pretty sure that the E2 copyright policy is that the noder (i.e. author) retains full copyright ownership, so it shouldn't be a problem. [[User:Eidolos|Eidolos]] 03:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
:Eidolos! Your article single handedly rekindled my love of all things NetHack. Although I am still a fled noder, I love your work! --[[User:Kalon9999|Kalon9999]] 03:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC) | :Eidolos! Your article single handedly rekindled my love of all things NetHack. Although I am still a fled noder, I love your work! --[[User:Kalon9999|Kalon9999]] 03:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I am wondering why creatures can use their gaze attack on you when you are viewing them through a wall while wearing the eyes of the overworld. While I understand that the astral vision acts like the wall is not there the creature should not be able to see you in order to use its gaze attack | ||
| + | http://img813.imageshack.us/img813/3565/52392019.png | ||
| + | as you can see the babau stars into my eyes. Well how is he focusing on me if I am on the other side of a wall? Is there a rationale I am missing or is this a bug? | ||
| + | [[User:Ndwolfwood|Ndwolfwood]] 10:26, 24 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:26, 24 December 2010
A few months back, I wrote the Everything2 article on The Eyes of the Overworld. To write the article that appears on NetHackWiki, I basically just trimmed out the unprofessional bits of the E2 article (as well as things most NetHackers know, such as that Gehennom is incredibly maze-y). If anyone has a problem with this either way, I'll be happy to rewrite this article or include more from the E2 article. I'm pretty sure that the E2 copyright policy is that the noder (i.e. author) retains full copyright ownership, so it shouldn't be a problem. Eidolos 03:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Eidolos! Your article single handedly rekindled my love of all things NetHack. Although I am still a fled noder, I love your work! --Kalon9999 03:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
I am wondering why creatures can use their gaze attack on you when you are viewing them through a wall while wearing the eyes of the overworld. While I understand that the astral vision acts like the wall is not there the creature should not be able to see you in order to use its gaze attack http://img813.imageshack.us/img813/3565/52392019.png as you can see the babau stars into my eyes. Well how is he focusing on me if I am on the other side of a wall? Is there a rationale I am missing or is this a bug? Ndwolfwood 10:26, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
