Difference between revisions of "User:Netzhack"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→"chance to" = opportunity; "chance of" = probability) |
(→"chance to" = opportunity; "chance of" = probability) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I realize the expression "chance to hit" is a regular part of D&D jargon, but nothing is lost by changing it to standard English ("chance of hitting" works just fine even on the page [[To-hit]]) along with the rest of the occurrences, most of which look like the product of simple (understandable) ignorance on the part of non-native English speakers, many of whom show a preference for infinitives where English idioms use gerunds. —[[User:Netzhack|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack|talk]]) 14:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC) | I realize the expression "chance to hit" is a regular part of D&D jargon, but nothing is lost by changing it to standard English ("chance of hitting" works just fine even on the page [[To-hit]]) along with the rest of the occurrences, most of which look like the product of simple (understandable) ignorance on the part of non-native English speakers, many of whom show a preference for infinitives where English idioms use gerunds. —[[User:Netzhack|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack|talk]]) 14:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Ten months later and no one has reverted a single one of those many corrections! Thanks for your acceptance of this little bit of pedantry, gang. [[User:Netzhack|Netzhack]] ([[User talk:Netzhack|talk]]) 12:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:31, 19 October 2017
I'm one of the developers of NetzHack (note the 'z'), the German localized version of NetHack. Netzhack (talk) 08:16, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
"chance to" = opportunity; "chance of" = probability
I've started checking pages systematically for misuse of "chance to", and correcting them.
I realize the expression "chance to hit" is a regular part of D&D jargon, but nothing is lost by changing it to standard English ("chance of hitting" works just fine even on the page To-hit) along with the rest of the occurrences, most of which look like the product of simple (understandable) ignorance on the part of non-native English speakers, many of whom show a preference for infinitives where English idioms use gerunds. —Netzhack (talk) 14:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)