Difference between revisions of "Forum:Draft work for Damage Type"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Darth l33t (talk | contribs) (reply) |
(Article submitted. Yay!) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[User:Furey|Furey]] ([[User talk:Furey|talk]]) 16:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC) | [[User:Furey|Furey]] ([[User talk:Furey|talk]]) 16:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
:I think that each flag should have its own column, rather than all sharing one, for ease of sorting. If that makes the table too wide, then I think the "example monsters" column can be removed, as it isn't really useful. I also think the flags would be more clear if they were expressed as positives rather than negatives. --[[User:Darth l33t|Darth l33t]] ([[User talk:Darth l33t|talk]]) 15:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC) | :I think that each flag should have its own column, rather than all sharing one, for ease of sorting. If that makes the table too wide, then I think the "example monsters" column can be removed, as it isn't really useful. I also think the flags would be more clear if they were expressed as positives rather than negatives. --[[User:Darth l33t|Darth l33t]] ([[User talk:Darth l33t|talk]]) 15:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::I redid all the flags. No more columns for any of them. Polarity is moot now, but I chose the polarity based on how many attacks are xxx vs noxxx. For example there are only a few "nohp" damage types, it would be noisy to add "does hp damage" to about 30 lines. | ||
| + | ::Example monsters are good for reader to make mental connections in reverse direction. Reader knows what an energy vortex is, now they can be sure they are on the right line. | ||
| + | ::Now that the flag information is all redone, what do you think? [[User:Furey|Furey]] ([[User talk:Furey|talk]]) 17:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Article committed to [[Damage type]]. I also copied these review comments into [[Talk:Damage type]]. Thanks for reviewing, hope you like the new article! [[User:Furey|Furey]] ([[User talk:Furey|talk]]) 20:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:31, 18 June 2024
I am working on an upgrade for damage type. My new content is here: User:Furey/Sandbox. Feedback welcome here or at User Talk:Furey/Sandbox. Both high-level feedback and corrections to specific details are welcome.
Furey (talk) 16:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think that each flag should have its own column, rather than all sharing one, for ease of sorting. If that makes the table too wide, then I think the "example monsters" column can be removed, as it isn't really useful. I also think the flags would be more clear if they were expressed as positives rather than negatives. --Darth l33t (talk) 15:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- I redid all the flags. No more columns for any of them. Polarity is moot now, but I chose the polarity based on how many attacks are xxx vs noxxx. For example there are only a few "nohp" damage types, it would be noisy to add "does hp damage" to about 30 lines.
- Example monsters are good for reader to make mental connections in reverse direction. Reader knows what an energy vortex is, now they can be sure they are on the right line.
- Now that the flag information is all redone, what do you think? Furey (talk) 17:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Article committed to Damage type. I also copied these review comments into Talk:Damage type. Thanks for reviewing, hope you like the new article! Furey (talk) 20:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
