Difference between revisions of "Forum:Draft work for Damage Type"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Feedback requested for draft of damage type changes)
 
(reply)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
[[User:Furey|Furey]] ([[User talk:Furey|talk]]) 16:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 
[[User:Furey|Furey]] ([[User talk:Furey|talk]]) 16:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 +
:I think that each flag should have its own column, rather than all sharing one, for ease of sorting. If that makes the table too wide, then I think the "example monsters" column can be removed, as it isn't really useful. I also think the flags would be more clear if they were expressed as positives rather than negatives. --[[User:Darth l33t|Darth l33t]] ([[User talk:Darth l33t|talk]]) 15:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:18, 14 June 2024


I am working on an upgrade for damage type. My new content is here: User:Furey/Sandbox. Feedback welcome here or at User Talk:Furey/Sandbox. Both high-level feedback and corrections to specific details are welcome.

Furey (talk) 16:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

I think that each flag should have its own column, rather than all sharing one, for ease of sorting. If that makes the table too wide, then I think the "example monsters" column can be removed, as it isn't really useful. I also think the flags would be more clear if they were expressed as positives rather than negatives. --Darth l33t (talk) 15:18, 14 June 2024 (UTC)