Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Patches"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GreyKnight (talk | contribs) |
(any patch is wikifodder) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should we only include particularly notable patches here, or any and everything? I suppose the [http://bilious.homelinux.org/ bilious] link is good enough to cover the masses. [[User:GreyKnight|GreyKnight]] 02:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC) | Should we only include particularly notable patches here, or any and everything? I suppose the [http://bilious.homelinux.org/ bilious] link is good enough to cover the masses. [[User:GreyKnight|GreyKnight]] 02:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I think any legitimate patch could have an article, providing you have something interesting to say about it. Hundreds of substub articles giving only the title and a link would be unnavigable and better served by a list or table on [[Patch]]. --[[User:Jayt|Jayt]] 14:07, 21 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:07, 21 August 2006
Should we only include particularly notable patches here, or any and everything? I suppose the bilious link is good enough to cover the masses. GreyKnight 02:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
