Difference between revisions of "Forum:Killed 120 weretigers but create monster still makes them"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I have killed 120 weretigers but create monster still makes them. I have killed over 120 of a couple of the devas and angels and they have not come back. However, weretigers are still being created when I cast create monster. What is going on? I have never tried to run a extinction game before but from the wiki it sounds like they should not be generated[[User:Ndwolfwood|Ndwolfwood]] 23:16, 18 December 2010 (UTC) | I have killed 120 weretigers but create monster still makes them. I have killed over 120 of a couple of the devas and angels and they have not come back. However, weretigers are still being created when I cast create monster. What is going on? I have never tried to run a extinction game before but from the wiki it sounds like they should not be generated[[User:Ndwolfwood|Ndwolfwood]] 23:16, 18 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | : Perhaps the game creates both animal and human werecreatures, pushing the limit to 240? Vanilla creates only the human form | + | : Perhaps the game creates both animal and human werecreatures, pushing the limit to 240? Vanilla creates only the human form of werecreatuers. Weretigers are specific to SLASH'EM and were perhaps not added correctly to monst.c. --[[User:Tjr|Tjr]] 23:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:34, 18 December 2010
I have killed 120 weretigers but create monster still makes them. I have killed over 120 of a couple of the devas and angels and they have not come back. However, weretigers are still being created when I cast create monster. What is going on? I have never tried to run a extinction game before but from the wiki it sounds like they should not be generatedNdwolfwood 23:16, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps the game creates both animal and human werecreatures, pushing the limit to 240? Vanilla creates only the human form of werecreatuers. Weretigers are specific to SLASH'EM and were perhaps not added correctly to monst.c. --Tjr 23:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
