Difference between revisions of "Forum:UnNethack5.1.0 hard time in Black market"

From NetHackWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
The best way (and funniest way) would be to revise the source so that kicking a worthless piece of glass at him while wearing fumble boots would get it lodged in his throat so that he suffocates on his own bleeding esophagus, and his pets would gather around mourning and screaming to the heavens "How could this be?!" [[Special:Contributions/98.172.189.77|98.172.189.77]] 17:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 
The best way (and funniest way) would be to revise the source so that kicking a worthless piece of glass at him while wearing fumble boots would get it lodged in his throat so that he suffocates on his own bleeding esophagus, and his pets would gather around mourning and screaming to the heavens "How could this be?!" [[Special:Contributions/98.172.189.77|98.172.189.77]] 17:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Is that really works? --[[User:Zgyt4033|Zgyt4033]] ([[User talk:Zgyt4033|talk]]) 01:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:20, 11 April 2014


It's easy to steal with create familiar spell, even to take out some black marketeers. But One-eyed Sam is hard. With highly enchented armor her AC reached -29, my lv.30 mastodon and lv.24 titan with +4 long sword cannot even hit her. Any idea about deal with her without angering her? --Zgyt4033 (talk) 07:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Judging from the revision history, this guy is becoming an arms race between a developer who's so enamored of his character that he can't bear the thought of someone he never met playing a single player game getting the better of him and players who find a way to do it. If you kill Lord British, they'll build a better British.

The best way (and funniest way) would be to revise the source so that kicking a worthless piece of glass at him while wearing fumble boots would get it lodged in his throat so that he suffocates on his own bleeding esophagus, and his pets would gather around mourning and screaming to the heavens "How could this be?!" 98.172.189.77 17:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Is that really works? --Zgyt4033 (talk) 01:20, 11 April 2014 (UTC)